Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 625–631 | Cite as

Effect of Composition and Distribution of Phases after Aging on Stamp Ability for Aluminum Alloy D16 (AA2014) Sheets

  • F. V. Grechnikov
  • E. A. Nosova


The relevance of this research is connected to the increasing requirements for accuracy in stamped parts produced from aged aluminum alloys, and can also be applied for making layered composites. Indexed requirements can be provided by controlling the structure of sheet blanks, particularly by the phase composition and distribution behavior. Results of experimental research into the effect of aging modes on composition, dispersion behavior, and stamping number of sheet samples of the D16 aluminum alloy (AA2014) are presented. Heat treatment includes quenching from a temperature of 500°С into water of room temperature and further aging: natural aging for 7 days and artificial aging at temperatures of 50, 100, 150, and 200°С with a duration at each temperature of 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min. A method of estimating the quantity of the characteristics of dispersion phases is proposed for the microstructural picture. Stamp ability is evaluated using the stamping number, which is the ration between yield stress and tensile strength. It is found that increasing aging temperature and durance leads to the growth of the stamping number, which shows a low ability for sheet-stamping operations of alloy. Aging at 50°С did not lead to the sedimentation of dispersion phases for either optical metallography or scan electron microscopy. The inhomogeneity of phase dispersion inside the grain grows at the initial stages of aging, when durance is less than 1 h and temperature is 100, 150 and 200°С. Further increasing durance to 4 h leads to inhomogeneity decreasing. There is no correlation between the uniformity of phase dispersion and the stamping number. The chemical composition of phases plays the main role in stamping number, outside of phase-dispersion uniformity. The phase-composition changes depend on the mode of heat treatment: at an annealed and naturally aged state, the θ and S phase is sediment. After aging at a temperature lower 150°С after a short durance of less than 1 h, the θ, S and T phases are revealed; the θ phase appears after aging at temperatures higher than 150°C and long durance reaching 4 h.


aluminum alloy structure stamping number aging phase composition phase dispersion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kablov, E.N., Antipov, V.V., and Senatorova, O.G., Layer aluminum glass plastics SIAL-1441 and collaboration with AIRBUS and TU DELFT, Tsvetnye metally, 2013, no. 9 (859), pp. 50–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kotik, H.G. and Perez Ipiña, J.E., Short-beam shear fatigue behavior of fiber metal laminate (Glare), Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, vol. 95, pp. 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grechnikov, F.V., Antipov, V.V., Erisov, Ya.A., and Grechnikova, A.F., A Manufacturability Improvement of Glass-Fiber Reinforced Aluminum Laminate by Forming an Effective Crystallographic Texture in V95 Alloy Sheets, Russ. J. Non-Ferrous Met., 2015, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Postnov, A.V., Postnov, V.I., and Kazakov, I.A., Osobennosti tekhnologii formovaniya profil’nykh konstruktsii iz metallopolimernykh kompozitsionnykh materialov (Formation features of profile constructions from metal–polymer composite materials), Izv. Samar. Nauch. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2009, vol. 11, no. 3 (2), pp. 499–508.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bikakis, G.S.E. and Savaidis, A., FEM simulation of simply supported GLARE plates under lateral indentation loading and unloading, Theor. Appl. Fracture Mech., 2016, vol. 83, pp. 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biswas, A., Siegel, D.J., and Seidman, D.N., Compositional evolution of Q-phase precipitates in an aluminum alloy, Acta Mater., 2014, no. 75, pp. 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng, S., Zhao, Y.H., Zhu, Y.T., and Ma, E., Optimizing the strength and ductility of fine structured 2024 Al alloy by nano-precipitation, Acta Mater., 2007, no. 55, pp. 5822–5832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhong, H., Rometsch, P.A., Cao, L., and Estrin, Yu., The influence of Mg/Si ratio and Cu content on the stretch formability of 6xxx aluminium alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, no. 651, pp. 688–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, X., Zhao, Yu., Ma, B., Zhang, J., and Zhang, M., Rapid grain refinement of 2024 Al alloy through recrystallization induced by electropulsing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, no. 612, pp. 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rudskoi, A.I., Kolbasnikov, N.G., and Ringinen, D.A., Formation of submicron and nanocrystalline structure by hot and warm deformation methods, Nauch.-Tekh. Ved. St.Petersburg Gos. Politekh. Univ., 2011, no. 123, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolbasnikov, N.G. and Kondrat’ev, S.Yu., Struktura. Entropiya. Fazovye prevrashcheniya i svoistva metallov (Structure. Entropy. Phase Transformations and Properties of Metals), St.Petersburg: St.Petersburg Gos. Politekh. Univ., 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yi, G., Littrell, K.C., Poplawsky, J.D., Cullen, D.A., Sundberg, E., and Free, M.L., Characterization of the effects of different tempers and aging temperatures on the precipitation behavior of Al–Mg (5.25 at %)–Mn alloys, Mater. Design, 2017, vol. 118, pp. 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mal’tsev, M.V., Metallografiya promyshlennykh tsvetnykh metallov i splavov (Metallography of Nonferrous Metals and Alloys), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolachev, B.A., Livanov, V.A., and Elagin, V.I., Metallovedenie i termicheskaya obrabotka tsvethykh metallov i splavov (Physical Metallurgy and Heat Treatment of Nonferrous Metals and Alloys), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cochard, A., Zhu, K., Joulié, S., Douin, J., Huez, J., Robbiola, L., Sciau, P., and Brunet, M., Natural aging on Al–Cu–Mg structural hardening alloys–investigation of two historical duralumins for aeronautics, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 690, pp. 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abúndez, A., Pereyra, I., Campillo, B., Serna, S., Alcudia, E., Molina, A., Blanco, A., and Mayén, J., Improvement of ultimate tensile strength by artificial ageing and retrogression treatment of aluminium alloy 6061, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 668, pp. 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lia, X.M. and Starink, M.J., Identification and analysis of intermetallic phases in overaged Zr-containing and Cr-containing Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 2011, vol. 509, no. 2, pp. 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu, Ya., Wang, J., Li, X., Chen, Y., Zhou, D., Zhou, G., and Xu, W., Effect of pre-deformation on the microstructures and properties of 2219 aluminum alloy during aging treatment, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, vol. 699, pp. 1140–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strobel, K., Lay, M.D.H., Easton, M.A., Sweet, L., Zhu, S., Parson, N.C., and Hill, A.J., Effects of quench rate and natural ageing on the age hardening behaviour of aluminium alloy AA6060, Mater. Charact., 2016, vol. 111, pp. 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hannard, F., Pardoen, T., Maire, E., Bourlot, C. Le, Mokso, R., and Simar, A., Characterization and micromechanical modelling of microstructural heterogeneity effects on ductile fracture of 6xxx aluminium alloys, Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 103, pp. 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song, Y.F., Ding, X.F., Xiao, L.R., Zhao, X.J., Cai, Z.Y., Guo, L., Li, Y.W., and Zheng, Z.Z., Effects of two-stage aging on the dimensional stability of Al–Cu–Mg alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, vol. 701, pp. 508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara State UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations