Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 525–529 | Cite as

Investigation into the solubility of nanopowders of the ZrO2–Y2O3–CeO2–Al2O3 system in the aqueous medium at various pH

Production Processes and Properties of Powders


Nanopowders of ZrO2–Y2O3–CeO2 and ZrO2–Y2O3–CeO2–Al2O3 systems are investigated with the purpose of studying the influence of pH of the dispersed medium on the solubility of nanopowder particles of a complex composition in an aqueous medium after membrane filtration and centrifugation to further prepare the stable dispersions necessary for toxicological investigations of nanoparticles. Concentrations of elements remaining in a supernatant after the sample preparation, which includes membrane filtration and centrifugation, are measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. It is established that that the largest aggregative stability of the nanopowder dispersion without the Al2O3 additive corresponds to the optimal range of pH 5.5–9.5, while with the Al2O3 additive, it is region pH 7.0. The results evidence that, when dispersing these powders, the hydrosol of yttrium oxyhydroxide, which is dissolved at pH < 6.0, is formed. When dissolving in water of the powder with the Al2O3 additive in the neutral medium, aluminum hydroxide is formed; in the acidic medium (pH < 6), it is replaced by main soluble aluminum salts; and in the alkali medium (pH > 7), amphoteric aluminum hydroxide is dissolved because of the formation of aluminates.


nanoparticles size agglomeration degree ZrO2–Y2O3–CeO2–Al2O3 system bioinert ceramics dissolution aqueous dispersions yttrium oxyhydroxide hydrosol aggregative stability inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy toxicity nanotoxicology differential centrifugal sedimentation practical recommendations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chevalier, J. and Gremillard, L., What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?, Biomaterials, 2006, vol. 27, pp. 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chevalier, J., Ceramics for medical applications: a picture for the next 20 years, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2009, vol. 29, pp. 1245–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palmero, P., Structural ceramic nanocomposites; a review of properties and powders’ synthesis methods, Nanomaterials, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 656–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antsiferova, I.V., The potential risks of exposure of nanodispersed metal and non-metallic powders on the environment and people, World Appl. Sci. J, 2013, vol. 22, pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antsiferova, I.V., Nanomaterials and potential environmental risks, Russ. J. Non-Ferrous Met., 2011, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elsaesser, A. and Howard, C.V., Toxicology of nanoparticles, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2012, vol. 64, pp. 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uliana de Simone, Elisa Roda, Cinzia Signorini, and Teresa Coccini, An integrated in vitro and in vivo testing approach to assess pulmonary toxicity of engineered cadmium- doped silica nanoparticles, Am. J. Nanomater., 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 40–56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shvedova, A.A., Kisin, E.R., Mercer, R., Murray, A.R., Johnson, V.J., and Potapovich, A.I., Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice, Am. J. Phisiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol., 2005, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. 698–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warheit, D.B., Laurence, B.R., Reed, K.L., Roach, D.H., Reynolds, A.M., and Webb, T.R., Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats, Toxicol. Sci., 2004, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porozova, S.E., Makarova, E.N., and Kul’met’eva, V.B., Influence of small Al2O3 additives on the properties of ZrO2–Y2O3–CeO2 ceramics, Izv. Samara Nauch. Tsentr. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015, vol. 17, no. 2 (4), pp. 874–880.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makarova, E., Antsiferova, I., Antsiferov, V., Suzdaleva, G., Nagibina, N., and Esaulova, I., Study of agglomeration process of nanocrystalline powder ZrO2–2Y2O3–4CeO2 in aqueous media by means of dynamic light scattering technique, Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci., 2016, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1553–1562.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Makarova, E.N. and Antsiferova, I.V., Factors influencing the stability of aqueous dispersions of nanocrystalline systems ZrO2–2Y2O3–4CeO2 optionally modified with Al2O3. Preparing for the future in-vivo studies, Res. J. Pharm., Biol. Chem. Sci., 2016, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1086–1098.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belova, I.A., Sarkisyan, I.S., Popova, I.V., and Kienskaya, K.I., Influence of sodium nitrite on the aggregation of particles in hydrosols oxyhydroxide yttrium, Usp. Khim. Khim. Technol., 2008, vol. 22, no. 3 (83), pp. 68–72.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shkol’nikov, E.V., Dissolution and amphoteric properties of Group IIIb oxides and hydroxides in aqueous media, Izv. St. Petersburg Gos. Lesotekh. Akad., 2015, vol. 210, pp. 156–164.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ekonyan, E.Z., Belova, I.A., and Zhilina, O.V., Synthesis and certain colloidal and chemical properties of hydrosols obtained from yttrium nitrate, Usp. Khim. Khim. Technol., 2014, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 131–133.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belova, I.A., Kienskaya, K.I., and Nazarov, V.V., Formation of the yttrium oxyhydroxide hydrosol and investigation into its colloidal properties, Usp. Khim. Khim. Technol., 2007, vol. 21, no. 3 (71), pp. 36–40.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rostokina, E.E., Fabrication of High-Purity Ultrafine Powders of Yttrium Aluminum Garnet by the Sol-Gel Method, Extended Abstract Cand. Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation, Nizhnii Novgorod: Nizhegor. Gos. Univ., 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perm National Research Polytechnic UniversityPermRussia

Personalised recommendations