Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Creating a Model for Scientific Research Monitoring

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

A model developed by the staff of the Library for Natural Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences for evaluating the activities of scientific institutions based on the analysis of bibliometric data is described. An original integrated methodology is proposed that covers the entire range of operation of scientific organizations, including publishing, innovative and educational activities, international relations, and contributions from scientific schools and diasporas. The analysis criteria are universal and applicable for determining the scientific level of both individual scientists or laboratories and entire scientific centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gumpenberger, C., Wieland, M., and Gorraiz, J., Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna, Libr. Manage., 2012, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panat, R., On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China, Scientometrics, 2014, no. 2, pp. 471–481.

  3. Chernyi, A.I., The ISI Web of Knowledge, a modern system for the information support of scientific research: A review, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2009, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson, J., Nolan-Brown, T., Pat, L., et al., Library research support in Queensland: A survey, Aust. Acad. Res. Libr., 2012, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2012.10722287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellegaard, O. and Wallin, J.A., The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?, Scientometrics, 2015, no. 105, pp. 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

  6. Archakov, A.I., Karpova, E.A., and Ponomarenko, E.A., International criteria for the effectiveness of research activities of scientific groups and individual scientists in the field of biology and medicine, Vestn. Ross. Akad. Med. Nauk, 2013, no. 5, pp. 4–9.

  7. Berezkina, N.Yu. and Khrenova, G.S., Using the database “Web of Science” to assess the results of scientific activities in the Republic of Belarus, Obraz. Tekhnol. O-vo., 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilyarevskii, R.S. and Syuntyurenko, O.V., Using the methods of scientometrics and comparative analysis of data for managing research for thematic areas, Nauchno-Tekh. Inf., Ser. 2, 2016, no. 12, pp. 3–10.

  9. Beskaravainaya, E.V. and Kharybina, T.N., Correction of information service in the library based on the analysis of information needs of its users, Rumyantsevskie chteniya-2017. 500-letie izdaniya pervoi slavyanskoi Biblii Frantsiska Skoriny: stanovlenie i razvitie kul’tury knigopechataniya. Materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konferentsii (18–19 aprelya 2017, Moskva) (Rumyantsev Readings-2017. The 500th Anniversary of the Publication of the First Slavic Bible by Francysk Skaryna: The Formation and Development of a Typography Culture. Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. (April 18–19, 2017, Moscow)), Moscow, pp. 74–79.

  10. Mitroshin, I.A., Beskaravainaya, E.V., and Kharybina, T.N., Investigation of patent activity in the Pushchino Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in Informatsionnoe obespechenie nauki: novye tekhnologii (Informational Support of Science: New Technologies), Kalenov, N.E. and Tsvetkov, V.A., Eds., Moscow: Bibl. Estesv. Nauk Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 142–149.

  11. Mokhnacheva, Yu.V. and Kharybina, T.N., Research performance of RAS institutions and Russian universities: A comparative bibliometric analysis, Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2011, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 569–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beskaravainaya, E.V. and Kharybina, T.N., Results of comparative analysis of the publication activity of scientists of the Pushchino Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2018, No. 6, pp. 63–77.

  13. Beskaravainaya, E.V. and Kharybina, T.N., A comparison of the bibliometric indicators of several laboratories of a scientific institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2018, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Library for Natural Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    E. V. Beskaravainaya & T. N. Kharybina

Authors
  1. E. V. Beskaravainaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. N. Kharybina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. V. Beskaravainaya or T. N. Kharybina.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by K. Lazarev

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beskaravainaya, E.V., Kharybina, T.N. Creating a Model for Scientific Research Monitoring. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 46, 100–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219020084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219020084

Keywords:

Search

Navigation