Skip to main content
Log in

Support Vector Machine and Nonlinear Regression Methods for Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are widely used for hydrological calculations based on the known basic properties of soils and sediments. The choice of predictors and the mathematical calculus are of particular importance for the accuracy of calculations. The aim of this study is to compare PTFs with the use of the nonlinear regression (NLR) and support vector machine (SVM) methods, as well as to choose predictor properties for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks). Ks was determined in direct laboratory experiments on monoliths of agrosoddy-podzolic soil (Umbric Albeluvisol Abruptic, WRB, 2006) and calculated using PTFs based on the NLR and SVM methods. Six classes of predictor properties were tested for the calculated prognosis: Ks-1 (predictors: the sand, silt, and clay contents); Ks-2 (sand, silt, clay, and soil density); Ks-3 (sand, silt, clay, soil organic matter); Ks-4 (sand, silt, clay, soil density, organic matter); Ks-5 (clay, soil density, organic matter); and Ks-6 (sand, clay, soil density, organic matter). The efficiency of PTFs was determined by comparison with experimental values using the root mean square error (RMSE) and determination coefficient (R2). The results showed that the RMSE for SVM is smaller than the RMSE for NLR in predicting Ks for all classes of PTFs. The SVM method has advantages over the NLR method in terms of simplicity and range of application for predicting Ks using PTFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouma, J., Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation, Adv. Soil Sci., 1989, vol. 9, pp. 177–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kecman, V., Learning and Soft Computing, Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models, Cambridge, MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klute, A. and Dirksen, C., Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils, in Methods of Soil Analysis, Klute, A., Ed., Madison, WI, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lamorski, K., Pachepsky, Y., Slawinski, C., and Walczak, R.T., Using support vector machines to develop pedotransfer functions for water retention of soils in Poland, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2008, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1443–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamorski, K., Slawinski, C., Moreno, F., et al., Modelling soil water retention using support vector machines with genetic algorithm optimisation, Sci. World J., 2014, id 740521. doi 10.1155/2014/740521

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mady, A.Y. and Shein, E.V., Modeling soil thermal diffusivity as a function of soil moisture, Bull. Orenburg State Univ., 2016, vol. 12, no. 200, pp. 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parsaie, A. and Haghiabi, A.H., Improving modelling of discharge coefficient of triangular labyrinth lateral weilrs using SVM, GMDH and MARS techniques, Irrig. Drain, 2017 vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 636–654. doi 10.1002/ird.2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J., and van Genuchten, M.T., ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions, J. Hydrol., 2001, vol. 251, no. 3–4, pp. 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shein, E.V., Mady, A.Y., and Mohamed El Hassna A., Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity assessment by direct and pedotransfer functions methods, Biogeosyst. Techn. J., 2015, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 396–400.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Twarakavi, N.K.C., Šimunek, J., and Schaap, M.G., Development of pedotransfer functions for estimation of soil hydraulic parameters using support vector machines, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2009, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1443–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walczak, R.T., Moreno, F., Salwinski, C., et al., Modeling of soil water retention curve using soil solid phase parameters, J. Hydrol., 2006, vol. 329, nos. 3–4, pp. 527–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wohlberg, B., Tartakovsky, D.M., and Guadagnini, A., Subsurface characterization with support vector machines, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 2006, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wösten, J.H.M., Finke, P.A., and Jansen, M.J.W., Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics, Geoderma, 1995, vol. 66, nos. 3–4, pp. 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wösten, J.H., Lilly, A., Neme, A., et al., Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils, Geoderma, 1999, vol. 90, nos. 3–4, pp. 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Y. Mady.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.Y. Mady, E.V. Shein, 2018, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 17: Pochvovedenie, 2018, No. 3, pp. 42–47.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mady, A.Y., Shein, E.V. Support Vector Machine and Nonlinear Regression Methods for Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 73, 129–133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687418030079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687418030079

Keywords

Navigation