Abstract
The effect of nonideality of the digital-to-analog conversion on properties of the up-anddown method is investigated. Two models for implementation of the up-and-down method, with their own reasons for inaccuracy, are considered and the consequences compared.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hermanis, E.H. and Karklin’sh, V.G., Discrete Stroboscopic Converters, Riga: Zinatne, 1977.
Askerzade, I.N., Josephson-effect samplers: A review, Tech. Phys., 2006, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 393–400.
Kruminsh, K. and Plotsinsh, V., Speed of operation of equivalent time methods for conversion of noisy signals: A review, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2013, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 318–325.
Krumins, K. and Karklins, V., The method “up-and-down” modifications at the mode of detection low signals for superwideband radars, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2005, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 70–77.
Kruminsh, K., Lorencs, A., and Plocinsh, V., Mathematical abstractions and practical realization of the “upand-down” method, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2010, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 191–198.
Lorencs, A., Digital signal processing UD method and its statistical characteristics, Electron. Electr. Eng., 2008, no. 6, pp. 33–36.
Lorencs, A. and Plocins, V., Efficient determination of a finite set of states for an up-and-down process possessing a practical closure, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2017, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 224–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
About this article
Cite this article
Plocins, V. The Effect of Inaccuracy of Digital-to-Analog Conversion on Properties of the Up-and-Down Method for Digital Signal Processing. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 52, 317–321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411618040090
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411618040090