Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Reducing update data time for exchange via MODBUS TCP protocol by controlling a frame length

  • Alexander Titaev


Despite the fact that the MODBUS protocol has been widely used in industrial automation systems, its capabilities are limited by the published standard. In this article improvement of the exchange between the industrial equipment and HMI-system, supporting the MODBUS implementation for Ethernet networks, are discussed. The experimentally measured values of the average request-response cycle time, jitter and time intervals consumed by each of the exchange participants are presented. The method of reducing the update data time using the procedure for grouping the required slave memory cells into requested via MODBUS blocks of optimal length has been proposed. The experimental results of this MODBUS protocol improvement and some comparisons have been presented and discussed.


MODBUS TCP protocol industrial network request time delay update cycle time 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    MODBUS organization, Modbus application protocol specification V1.1b3. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rezai, A., Keshavarzi, P., and Moravej, Z., Secure SCADA communication by using a modified key management scheme, ISA Trans., 2013, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erez, N. and Wool, A., Control variable classification, modeling and anomaly detection in Modbus/TCP SCADA systems, Int. J. Crit. Infrastr. Prot., 2015, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 517–524.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, P.B. and Chen, F.Y., Embedded control system with SCADA Modbus network for monitoring heat treating furnace, Adv. Mater. Res., 2014, vols. 1006–1007, pp. 909–912.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tellez-Anguiano, A., Rivas-Cruz, F., Astorga-Zaragoza, C.-M., Alcorta-Garcia, E., and Juarez-Romero, D., Process control interface system for a distillation plant, Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 2009, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaitan, V.-G., Gaitan, N.-C., and Ungurean, I., A flexible acquisition cycle for incompletely defined fieldbus protocols, ISA Trans., 2014, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 776–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu, T. and Bertolotti, I.C., Overhead and ACK-induced jitter in Modbus TCP communication, Proc. 1st IEEE International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI 2015, pp. 392–397.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, B., Lee, D., and Choi, T., Performance evaluation for Modbus/TCP using Network Simulator NS3, Proc. IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Botta, A., Dainotti, A., and Pescapè, A., A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios, Comput. Networks, 2012, vol. 56, no. 15, pp. 3531–3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wireshark, Riverbed Technology, Inc. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sreram, B., Bounapane, F., Subathra, B., and Srinivasan, S., Estimating random delays in Modbus over TCP/IP network using experiments and general linear regression neural networks with genetic algorithm smoothing, Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., 2016, vol. 398, pp. 615–625.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ural Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations