Skip to main content
Log in

Features of the Focal Mechanisms of the Strongest Mediterranean Earthquakes

  • PHYSICS OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERE, AND HYDROSPHERE
  • Published:
Moscow University Physics Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The focal mechanisms of earthquakes in the Mediterranean region that do not match the double couple focal model and that describe the complex source rupture are considered. Analysis is performed by decomposition of the observed seismic moment tensor of the strongest earthquakes into isotropic (ISO), double couple (DC), and compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) components. There were 121 earth- quakes with magnitudes over 5.5 in the region according to the observations for 2000–2019. Of these, 57 events do not match the double couple model. The CLVD parameters are obtained for these earthquakes, and the physical interpretation of the results of the seismic moment tensor decomposition are proposed. This is the first time such an analysis is conducted. Conclusions about the features of the observed destruction processes and the structure of the medium in the focal zones are made based on the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. K. Aki and P. Richards, Quantitative Seismology (University Science Books, 2009), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. V. Voronina, Earthquake Focal Mechanics. Special Course (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Lutikov, S. L. Yunga, and M. S. Kuchai, Geofiz. Issled. 11 (3), 11 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Lutikov, E. A. Rogozhin, G. Yu. Dontsova, and M. S. Kuchai, Fiz. Zemli, №2, 45 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Foulger and B. R. Julian, Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering (Springer, Berlin, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Frohlich, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 91, 213 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. R. Julian, A. D. Miller, and G. R. Foulger, Rev. Geophys. 36, 525 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Randall and L. Knopoff, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4957 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Yunga, A. Lutikov, and O. Molchanov, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., Copernicus Publ. Eur. Geosci. Union 5 (1), 11 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. W. Herman, G. P. Hayes, G. M. Smoczyk, R. Turner, B. Turner, J. Jenkins, et al., U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1083-Q (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20101083Q

  11. Pino et al., Sci. Rep. 9, 2005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41453-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/search.

  13. V. Vavryčuk, J. Geophys. Res. 106 (16), 339 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Vavrčyuk, Geophys. Prospect. 55, 381 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Vavryčuk, Tectonophysics 456, 74 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Vavryčuk, J. Seismol. 19 (1), 231 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Stierle, Geowissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Freien Universität (Berlin, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. Vavryiuk, J. Geophys. Res. 116, B12320 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008770

  19. T. Fischer and A. Guest, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L05307 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045447

  20. G. F. Panza and A. Sarat, Geophys. J. Int. 143, 353 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Legendre, S. Meier, W. Lebedev, and L. Friederich, Geophys. J. Int. 191, 282 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Voronina.

Additional information

Translated by O. Pismenov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voronina, E.V. Features of the Focal Mechanisms of the Strongest Mediterranean Earthquakes. Moscow Univ. Phys. 75, 95–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134920010154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134920010154

Keywords:

Navigation