Advertisement

Effect of Photo-response Nonlinearity on the Diffraction Efficiency of Holograms

  • S. A. ShoydinEmail author
Optical Information Technologies
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of the photo-response nonlinearity of a holographic material on the achievable diffraction efficiency of holograms has been studied. It has been shown that the interaction between the hologram form factor and the photo-response nonlinearity leads to an increase in diffraction efficiency compared to a linear photo-response. Numerical calculations for the photo-response nonlinearity corresponding to Reoxan phase holographic material are presented.

Keywords

holography diffraction efficiency form factor visibility degree of coherence Gaussian beam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. I. Sukhanov, A. V. Veniaminov, A. I. Ryskin, and N. V. Nikonorov, “Developments of State Optical Institute in the Area of Volume Recording Media for Holography, ” in Proceedings of the All-Russia Seminar “Yurii Nikolaevich Denisyuk — the Founder of Domestic Holography” (SPbGU ITMO, St. Petersburg, 2007), pp. 262–276 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. V. Shelkovnikov, V. V. Russkikh, E. V. Vasil’ev, et al., “Photopolymeric Material Based on an Organic-Inorganic Sol-Gel Matrix for Holography,” Opt. Zh. 73 (7), 65–69 (2006).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. S. Gibin and P. E. Tverdokhleb, “Influence of the Nonlinear Response of Photo Material in Holographic Recording of the Fourier Image of a Slit,” Radiotekhnika i Elektronika 16 (1), 71–76 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. S. Gibin, E. F. Pen, and A. V. Trubetskoi, “Method of Selecting the Conditions for Recording Holograms,” Avtometriya, No. 3, 26–31 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Shoydin, “Diffraction Efficiency of Holograms Recorded with Gaussian Beams,” in Proceedings of the XI Intern. Sci. Congr. Interexpo Geo-Sibir’-2015 (SGUGiT, Novosibirsk, 2015), Vol. 1, pp. 71–76 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. A. Shoydin, “Requirements to Lasers and Form Factor of Holograms,” Opt. Mem. & Neural Networks (Inform. Opt.) 23 (4), 287–294 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. A. Shoydin, “Requirements to Lasers and Form Factor of Holograms,” Opt. Zh. 83 (5), 65–75 (2016).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. A. Shoydin, “A Method of Achieving the Maximum Diffraction Efficiency of Holograms Based on Optimizing the Form Factor,” Komp. Optika 40 (4), 501–507 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. J. Collier, C. B. Burkhardt, and L. H. Lin, Optical Holography (Academic, New York, 1971; Mir, Moscow, 1973).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. A. Shoydin and E. A. Sander, “Recording Holograms in Dynamic Media without Relaxation,” Opt. Spektr. 58 (1), 200–202 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. V. Andreeva, B. G. Manukhin, and N. V. Andreeva, “Reversible and Irreversible Changes in the Optical Parameters of Diffen Polymer Material due to Exposure to Radiation, ” in Abstracts of the XIVth Intern. Conf. “Holography: Science and Practice” (HOLOEXPO 2017) (Bauman MSTU, Moscow, 2017), pp. 195–197.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Siberian State University of Geosystems and TechnologiesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations