Advertisement

Russian Engineering Research

, Volume 38, Issue 12, pp 1015–1017 | Cite as

Ball End Mill with Curved Cutting Edge and Constant Cutting Geometry

  • E. A. RyabovEmail author
  • R. M. Khisamutdinov
  • V. A. GrechishnikovEmail author
  • S. Yu. YurasovEmail author
  • O. I. YurasovaEmail author
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

A design method is proposed for a ball end mill with constant inclination of the cutting edge to the spherical section. The tooth profile specified in the normal cross section is the generatrix, while the curved cutting edge at the sphere in the form of a loxodrome is the directrix.

Keywords:

ball end mill cutting edge helical channels 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Sungatov, I.Z., Improving the performance of spherical mills with helical flutes, Cand. Sci. (Eng.) Dissertation, Ulyanovsk, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Semenchenko, I.I., Matyushkin, V.M., and Sakharov, G.N., Proektirovanie metallorezhushchikh instrumentov: uchebnoe posobie (Engineering of Metal Cutting Tools: Manual), Moscow: Mashgiz, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ushakov, M.V., Ivanov, V.V., and Pavlova, E.V., The direction of chip flow along the frontal surface of the tool, Izv. Tul’sk. Gos. Univ., Tekhn. Nauki, 2014, no. 5, pp. 118–123.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faskhutdinov, A.I., Profiling of screw grooves and machining spherical end mills, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Eng.) Dissertation, Izhevsk, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lunev, A.N., Moiseeva, L.T., and Yadgarov, I.T., Pareto-optimal solution of a two-objective problem in choosing conditions of monoimpeller milling, Russ. Aeronaut., 2010, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Safarov, D.T., Kondrashov, A.G., Safarova, L.R., and Glinina, G.F., Energy planning in production shops with numerically controlled machine tools, Russ. Eng. Res., 2017, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 827–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korovin, E.M., Lunyov, A.N., and Khasanov, R.Sh., Optimization of cutting parameters for automatic machines, Russ. Aeronaut., 2006, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 100–105.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turanov, A.V., Lunev, A.N., Moiseev, V.S., and Moiseeva, L.T., Optimization of trajectory choice for machining GTE blade surfaces, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Aviats. Tekh., 2004, no. 2, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safarov, D.T., Kondrashov, A.G., Safarova, L.R., and Glinina, G.F., Energy planning in production shops with numerically controlled machine tools, Russ. Eng. Res., 2017, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 827–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Petukhov, Yu.E., Kosarev, V.A., et al., Instrumental’naya tekhnika, tekhnologiya izgotovleniya v SAPR RI: uchebnoe posobie (Instrumental Technique and Production Technology in CAD RI: Manual), Grechishnikov, V.A., Ed., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., Stankin, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Domnin, P.V., Isaev, A.V., et al., Formoobrazovanie i kontrol’ rezhushchikh instrumentov: uchebnoe posobie (Shaping and Control of Cutting Tools: Manual), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., Stankin, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naberezhnye Chelny Institute, Kazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia
  2. 2.Stankin Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations