Advertisement

Russian Meteorology and Hydrology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 338–344 | Cite as

AERMOD Application for Assessment of Formaldehyde Emission Dispersion from Chipboard Production

  • S. V. KakarekaEmail author
  • S. V. Salivonchyk
  • Yu. G. Kokosh
Article

Abstract

The results of modeling the formaldehyde dispersion from the chipboard production at the plant in Ivatsevichi (the Brest region, the Republic of Belarus) are presented. The AERMOD Gaussian model developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is applied. Maximum hourly concentrations of formaldehyde at the distance to 3 km from emission sources are calculated. The simulation results are verified by under-plume measurements of formaldehyde concentration in air at the distance to 650 m from the sources as well as near the sources of formaldehyde releases. The correlation between the measured and simulated concentrations is demonstrated. The sources of uncertainty of the results associated with the shortage of available meteorological information with a required temporal resolution are described.

Keywords

Emissions stationary sources dispersion Gaussian dispersion model AERMOD formaldehyde woodworking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. E. Berlyand, Modern Problems of Atmospheric Diffusion and Air Pollution (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1975) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. S. Bespalov, “Simulation of Pollutant Transport in the Atmosphere as a Tool of Air Protection Activities,” Problemy Ekologicheskogo Monitoringa i Modelirovaniya Ekosistem, No. 1, 27 (2016) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yearbooks of Air Conditions for 2010–2015 (Republic Center for Hydrometeorology, Radioactive Pollution Control, and Environmental Monitoring of the Ministry of Nature of the Republic of Belarus), http://rad.org.by/articles/vozduh [in Russian].
  4. 4.
    S. V. Kakareka and Yu. G. Kokosh, “Impact Assessment of Wood-processing Facilities on Formaldehyde Concentrations in Air,” Doklady Natsional’noi Akademii Nauk Belarusi, No. 2, 60 (2016) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OND-86. A Method to Calculate Atmospheric Concentrations of Pollutants Released from Enterprises (Approved by the USSR State Committee for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Control, August 4, 1986, No. 192) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Decree of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Belarus No. 113, November 8, 2016, http://pravo.by/upload/docs/op/W21631467p_1485896400.pdf [in Russian].
  7. 7.
    AERSURFACE User’s Guide. EPA-454/B-08–001 (US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 2008).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Afzali, M. Rashid, M. Afzali, and V. Younesi, “Prediciton of Air Pollutants Concentrations from Multiple Sources Using AERMOD Coupled with WRF Prognostic Model,” J. Cleaner Production, 166 (2017).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federal Climate Complex Data Documentation for Integrated Surface Data (National Climatic Data Center Air Force Combat Climatology Center Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Detachment, USA, 2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “Federal Register: Final Rule,” in FR Doc No: 05–22207, Nov. 9, No. 216, Vol. 70 (2005).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Generate Soundings from Rapid Refresh (RAP), FIM, GFS, NAM, and Other Model Analyses and Forecasts, RAOBS, Profilers, Radiometers, or Aircraft (Restricted), https://rucsoundings.noaa.gov.
  12. 12.
    Integrated Surface Hourly Database, ISHD, ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa.
  13. 13.
    A. Noorpoor and H. R. Rahman, “Application of AERMOD to Local Scale Diffusion and Dispersion Modeling of Air Pollutants from Cement Factory Stacks (Case Study: Abyek Cement Factory),” Pollution, No. 1, 4 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. L. Schulman, D. G. Strimaitis, and J. S. Scire, Addendum to ISC3 Users Guide: The PRIME Plume Rise and Building Downwash Model (Electric Power Res. Inst., 1997).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SRTM 90 m Digital Elevation Data, http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org.
  16. 16.
    E. Tomasi, G. Antonacci, L. Giovannini, D. Zardi, and M. Ragazzi, “Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling with AERMOD for Comparative Impact Assessment of Different Pollutant Emission Sources in an Alpine Valley,” WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 198 (2015).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    User’s Guide for the AERMOD Meteorological Preprocessor (AERMET). EPA-454/B-03–002 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    User’s Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model—AERMOD. EPA-454/B-03–001 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 2004).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. A. Westbrook and P. S. Sullivan, Fugitive Dust Modeling with AERMOD for PM 10 Emissions from a Municipal Waste Landfill (2006), http://www.scsengineers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Sullivan_Fugitive_Dust_Modeling.pdf.

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Kakareka
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. V. Salivonchyk
    • 1
  • Yu. G. Kokosh
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Nature ManagementNational Academy of Sciences of BelarusMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations