Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 492–497 | Cite as

Textural Properties of Dough and Sensory Characteristics of Bread Enriched with Crushed Safflower Seeds

  • K. S. KutsenkovaEmail author
  • N. V. Nepovinnykh
  • L. V. Andreeva
  • Qingbin Guo
STORAGE AND PROCESSING OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract—The paper notes the interest of the population in bakery products with various functional additives instead of traditional wheat bread. It presents a method for preparing bread fortified with crushed safflower seeds, which was developed according to the following recipe: wheat flour (564 g), safflower seeds (60 g), salt (10 g), pressed yeast (54 g), vegetable oil (13 g), sugar (35 g), and drinking water (284 g). Whole-ground safflower seeds are a nontraditional vegetable additive—a source of high-grade vegetable protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids (including linoleic and linolenic acids), dietary fiber, vitamins, and minerals. The effect of the whole-ground safflower seed additive to texture properties was studied. The water absorption capacity of the experimental sample was found to be 7% lower than that of the control (without safflower), which is explained by the hydrophobicity of the whole-ground safflower seed additive due to the high fat content. A change in the rheological parameters of the experimental sample due to the chemical composition of the introduced additive was revealed. During the experiment, the organoleptic and physicochemical parameters of bread were studied. The experimental samples had a smooth, crack-free surface, uniform porosity and light-yellow color in the fracture, and taste and smell peculiar to this type of product, which had a pleasant, delicate flavor and aroma of the additive. A slight increase in the indicators of porosity, acidity, shape stability and humidity compared with the control sample was noted. The technological scheme of production and the recipe of bread with the addition of whole-ground safflower seeds were worked out; the optimal technological parameters of production were determined.

Keywords: bread nontraditional vegetable additive safflower seeds textural properties of dough sensory characteristics of bread 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out by the scientific groups of young scientists from Russia and China within the framework of a joint research agreement on the theme “Application of Nontraditional Sources of Plant Raw Materials in Bread Making for Health Benefits and Nutritional Value.”

FUNDING

The research was supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young Russian scientists MD-2464.2018.8 on the topic “Designing the Composition and Technology of Balanced Food Products Aimed at Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases and Their Complications.”

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Lygina, N.I., Rudakov, O.V., and Soboleva, Yu.P., Economic factors of the functional food market development, Sots.-Ekon. Yavleniya Protsessy, 2014, no. 9, pp. 115–121.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, G., Guo, Q., Wang, C., Ding, H.H., and Cui, S.W., Fenugreek fibre in bread: Effects on dough development and bread quality, LWT Food Sci. Technol., 2016, no. 71, pp. 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almeida, E.L., Chang, Y.K., and Steel, C.J., Dietary fibre sources in bread: Influence on technological quality, LWT Food Sci. Technol., 2013, no. 2, pp. 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matveeva, I.V., Bakery improvers, Sbornik tezisov seminara “Primenenie pishchevykh dobavok v proizvodstve produktov pitaniya” (Abstracts of the Seminar “Application of Food Additives in Food Production), St. Petersburg, 2005, pp. 23–25.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spirichev, V.B., Shatnyuk, L.N., and Poznyakovskii, V.M., Obogashchenie pishchevykh produktov vitaminami i mineral’nymi veshchestvami (Enrichment of Foods with Vitamins and Minerals), Novosibirsk: Sib. Univ. Izd., 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poznyakovskii, V.M., Avstrievskikh, A.N., and Vekovtsev, A.A., Pishchevye i biologicheski aktivnye dobavki (Nutritional and Dietary Supplements), Kemerovo: Izd. Ob”edin. Ross. Univ., 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dragomiretskii, Yu.A., Tselebnye svoistva zhirov i masel (Healing Properties of Fats and Oils), Donetsk: Stalker, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norov, M.S., Safflower as a promising forage crop under conditions of Tajikistan’s dryland farming, Kormoproizvodstvo, 2005, no. 11, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polushkin, P.V., The influence of the water regime and density of the state on the productivity of dyeing safflower on light chestnut soils of the Saratov Trans-Volga region, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Agric.) Dissertation, Saratov, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shikov, A.N., Makarov, V.G., and Ryzhenkov, V.E., Rastitel’nye masla i maslyanye ekstrakty: Tekhnologiya, standartizatsiya, svoistva (Vegetable Oils and Oil Extracts: Technology, Standardization, and Properties), Moscow: Izd. Dom Russ. Vrach, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dyuba, A., The modern technique for controlling the quality of grain and flour by rheological properties of the dough, determined using Mixolab profiler, Sbornik Materialov I nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Upravlenie reologicheskimi svoistvami pishchevykh produktov” (Proc. 1st Sci.-Pract. Conf. with International Participation Control of Rheological Properties of Food Products), Moscow, 2008, pp. 86–95.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulevatova, T.B., Andreeva, L.V., Piskunova, G.V., and Matveeva, V.A., The effect of winter wheat grain lesion by sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) on rheological properties of the dough, Agro XXI, 2013, nos. 4–6, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Losso, J.N., Holliday, D.L., Finley, J.W., et al., Fenugreek bread: A treatment for diabetes mellitus, J. Med. Food, 2009, no. 12, pp. 1046–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brennan, C.S., Blake, D.E., Ellis, P.R., and Schofield, J.D., Effects of guar galactomannan on wheat bread microstructure and on the in vitro and in vivo digestibility of starch in bread, J. Cereal Sci., 1996, no. 24, pp. 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts, K.T., Cui, S.W., Chang, Y.H., Ng, P.K.W., and Graham, T., The influence of fenugreek gum and extrusion modified fenugreek gum on bread, Food Hydrocolloids, 2012, no. 26, pp. 350–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ptichkina, N.M. and Kutsenkova, V.S., RF Patent 2 629 291, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. S. Kutsenkova
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. V. Nepovinnykh
    • 1
  • L. V. Andreeva
    • 2
  • Qingbin Guo
    • 3
  1. 1.Vavilov Saratov State Agrarian UniversitySaratovRussia
  2. 2.Agricultural Research Institute of the Southeast RegionSaratovRussia
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Ministry of EducationTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations