Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 524–527 | Cite as

Analysis of Ecological Functions of Birch and Oak Stands in the Conditions of an Urbanized Environment Based on the Materials of Long-Term Observations

  • N. N. Dubenok
  • V. V. Kuzmichev
  • A. V. LebedevEmail author
Forestry
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the productivity and ecological functions of birch and oak stands growing under various anthropogenic influences. The objects of the study are birch and oak stands in permanent test plots of the Forest Experimental District of the Russian State Agrarian University—Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. It is revealed that oak stands are more productive than birch stands in the conditions of the city of Moscow. The contribution of both tree species to the formation of a positive oxygen balance of cities is approximately the same. Analysis of leaf surface index values shows that crowns of birch stands are capable of retaining more solids suspended in the air than oak stands. To maintain the ecological, aesthetic, sanitary-hygienic, and oxygen-producing functions of stands in the conditions of the city of Moscow, it is necessary to carry out economic measures aimed at the formation of mixed, uneven-aged coniferous- deciduous forests.

Keywords

birch and oak stands urban environment ecological functions productivity of stands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Korotkov, V.N., Taxation characteristics of forest plantations as a reflection of the history of nature management, Monitoring sostoyaniya prirodno-kul’turnykh kompleksov Podmoskov’ya. Yubileynyi sbornik dokladov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 8–9 sentyabrya 1999 goda (Monitoring of the State of Natural-Cultural Complexes of the Moscow Region. Anniversary Proc. Sci.-Pract. Conf. September 8–9, 1999), Moscow, 2000, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuz'michev, V.V., Zakonomernosti dinamiki drevostoev: Printsipy i modeli (Patterns in the Dynamics of Forest Stands: Principles and Models), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiviste, A.K., Funktsii rosta lesa (Forest Growth Functions), Tartu: Est. S-kh. Akad., 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liepa, I.Ya., Dinamika drevesnykh zapasov: Prognozirovanie i ekologiya (Dynamics of Wood Stocks: Forecasting and Ecology), Riga: Zinatne, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shvidenko, A.Z., Shchepashchenko, D.G., Nil’son, S., and Bului, Yu.I., Tablitsy i modeli khoda rosta i produktivnosti nasazhdenii osnovnykh lesoobrazuyushchikh porod Severnoi Evrazii. Normativno-spravochnye materialy (Tables and Models of the Course of Growth and Productivity of Plantations of Principal Forest-Forming Species of Northern Eurasia. Regulatory Reference Materials), Moscow: Fed. agentstvo lesn. khoz., 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Usol'tsev, V.A., Fitomassa i pervichnaya produktsiya lesov Evrazii (Phytomass and Primary Production of Forests of Eurasia), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Utkin, A.I., Ermolova, L.S., and Utkina, I.A., Ploshchad’ poverkhnosti lesnykh rastenii: Sushchnost’, parametry, ispol’zovanie (Surface Area of Forest Plants: Essence, Parameters, and Application), Vomperskii, S.E., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. N. Dubenok
    • 1
  • V. V. Kuzmichev
    • 1
  • A. V. Lebedev
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Russian State Agrarian University–Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural AcademyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations