Advertisement

Russian Agricultural Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 528–532 | Cite as

Novel Native Insectoacaricides Based on Avermectins

  • T. V. DolzhenkoEmail author
  • S. D. Karakotov
  • V. I. Dolzhenko
Plant Protection
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Data on assessment of biological efficiency of insectoacaricides based on Abamectin and Emamectin benzoate, metabolites of soil actinomyces, for farm crop protection systems against pests are presented. Efficiency of new products not yet included in the Federal Catalogue of Pesticides was studied. These were Mekar (ME, 18 g/L of abamectin) against the apple sucker (Psylla mali Schmid.) in Orel and Tambov oblasts and Krasnodar krai, against mites in apple trees in Rostov, Tambov, and Orel oblasts, and Yunona (ME, 50 g/L of emamectin benzoate) against codling moth in Rostov oblast and Krasnodar krai. The trials conducted on assessment of effects of new local products created on the basis of actinomyces metabolites confirmed a high biological efficiency in the regulation of the pest of apple trees. Mekar (ME, 18 g/L) and Yunona (ME, 50 g/L) may be recommended for the control of pest apple trees in biologized and adaptively integrated plant protection systems after their registration in Russia.

Keywords

biological efficiency avermectins abamectin emamectin benzoate phytophages 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boikova, I.V., Secondary metabolites of actinomycetes— the basis for the creation of new insecticidal preparations, Vestn. Zashch. Rast., 2016, no. 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dolzhenko, V.I., Burkova, L.A., Ivanova, G.P., and Belykh, E.B., Actinomycetic preparations for the protection of greenhouse crops from pests, in Biologicheskaya zashchita rastenii—osnova stabilizatsii agroekosistem. Vyp. 4. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii (Biological Protection of Plants—the Basis for the Stabilization of Agroecosystems. Issue 4. Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.), Krasnodar, 2006, pp. 303–305.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manal, S.M.I. and Maha, F.M.S., Acaricidal activity of spinosad and abamectin against two-spotted spider mites, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 2007, vol. 43, pp. 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iutinskaya, G.A. and Belyavskaya, L.A., Ecologically safe polyfunctional biopreparations of the new generation based on metabolites of soil streptomycetes for plant growing, in Mikrobnye biotekhnologii: Fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty (Microbial Biotechnologies: Fundamental and Applied Aspects), Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka, 2017, pp. 142–144.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erban, T., Rybansky, J., and Hubert, J., The efficacy of four avermectins on the synanthropic mite lepidoglyphus destructor under laboratory conditions, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 2012, vol. 58, pp. 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolzhenko, T.V., Metabolites of actinomycetes to protect the garden from pests, Vestn. Orel Gos. Agrarn. Univ., 2012, no. 3, pp. 91–93.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saber, M., Ahmadi, Z., and Mahdavinia, G., Sublethal effects of spirodiclofen, abamectin and pyridaben on life-history traits and life-table parameters of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), Exp. Appl. Acarol., 2018, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolzhenko, T.V., Birationally effective agent—emamectin benzoate for regulating the number of apple codling moths, Plodovod. Yagodovod. Ross., 2013, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 143–147.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Pesticide Manual, BCPC, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dolzhenko, T.V., Abamectin-based insecticoacaricides, Agrokhimiya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katz, L. and Baltz, R.H., Natural product discovery: Past, present, and future, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2016, vol. 43, pp. 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Illarionov, A.I., Ekotoksikologiya pestitsidov (Ecotoxicology of Pesticides), Voronezh: Voronezh. Gos. Agrarn. Univ., 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryabchinskaya, T.A. and Kharchenko, G.L., Ekologizatsiya zashchity yabloni ot vrednykh organizmov (Ecologization of Protection of Apple from Pests), Moscow: Rosinformagrotekh, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryabchinskaya, T.A., Kharchenko, G.L., Sterlina, T.S., Kruglyak, E.B., Drinyaev, V.A., and Yurkiv, V.A., Phytoverm (streptovermin)—a promising preparation in the fight against garden pests, Agrokhimiya, 1995, no. 1, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andreeva, I.V. and Shternshis, M.V., Efficiency of phytoverm against sucking pests of closed ground, Sib. Vestn. S-kh. Nauki, 2006, no. 1, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berezina, N.V., Chizhov, V.N., Drinyaev, V.A., and Yurkiv, V.A., Prospects for the use of avermectin-containing drugs in protecting plants from pests, Gavrish, 1997, no. 2, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chizhov, V.N., Skukina, E.V., and Yurkiv, V.A., Action of avermectin-containing preparations on arthropods, Zashch. Karantin Rast., 2000, no. 8, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shternshis, M.V., Shpatova, T.V., Kuznetsova, I.A., Tomilova, O.G., and Andreeva, I.V., Influence of phytoverm on pests of vegetable and berry crops, Agrokhimiya, 2006, no. 3, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dolzhenko, T.V. and Dolzhenko, V.I., Insectoacaricides based on aversectin C and emamectin benzoate, Agrokhimiya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 41–47.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Manual of Biocontrol Agents, BCPC, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shternshis, M.V., Andreeva, I.V., and Tsvetkova, V.P., Trends in the use of biological products to protect plants from phytophages in Western Siberia, in Integrirovannaya zashchita rastenii: Strategiya i taktika (Integrated Plant Protection: Strategy and Tactics), Minsk: Nesvizh, 2011, pp. 374–377.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gosudarstvennyi katalog pestitsidov i agrokhimikatov razreshennykh dlya primeneniya na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (State Catalog of Pesticides and Agrochemicals Permitted for Use in the Territory of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 2017.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Metodicheskie ukazaniya po registratsionnym ispytaniyam insektitsidov, akaritsidov, mollyuskotsidov i rodentitsidov v sel’skom khozyaistve (Guidelines for Registration Testing of Insecticides, Acaricides, Molluscicides, and Rodenticides in Agriculture), St. Petersburg, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sokolov, M.S., Sanin, S.S., Dolzhenko, V.I., Spiridonov, Yu.Ya., Glinushkin, A.P., Karakotov, S.D., and Nadykta, V.D., The concept of fundamental and applied research of plant and harvest protection, Agrokhimiya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dolzhenko, V.I., Biological substantiation for the formation of a modern range of plant protection products, Fitosanitarnoe ozdorovlenie ekosistem. Materialy vtorogo Vserossiiskogo s"ezda po zashchite rastenii (Phytosanitary Rehabilitation of Ecosystems. Proc. Second All-Russian Congress on Plant Protection), St. Petersburg, 2005, vol. 2, p. 225.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. V. Dolzhenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. D. Karakotov
    • 2
  • V. I. Dolzhenko
    • 3
  1. 1.St. Petersburg State Agrarian UniversityPushkin–St. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Shchelkovo AgrokhimShchelkovoRussia
  3. 3.All-Russia Scientific Research Institute for Plant ProtectionPushkin–St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations