Advertisement

Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 16–18 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Effect of Moisture Content in the Wood Sample Structure on the Quality of Tomographic X-Ray Studies of Tree Rings of Stem Wood

  • A. V. Batranin
  • S. L. Bondarenko
  • M. A. KazaryanEmail author
  • A. A. Krasnykh
  • I. A. Miloichikova
  • S. V. Smirnov
  • S. G. Stuchebrov
  • Yu. M. Cherepennikov
Article

Abstract

For the first time, the effect of moisture content in the structure of wood samples on the quality of the results of the study of their internal structure using high-resolution X-ray computer tomography is considered. The tomographic method for determining the internal distribution of the structure and density of tree rings of stem wood can be used to solve problems in the field of dendroclimatology and biometeorology.

Keywords

X-ray computer tomography X-ray radiation X-ray tube dendrology tree rings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Lazo, E. Steinnes, F. Qarri, et al., Chemosphere 190, 337 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. De Nicola, E. C. Graña, J. R. Aboal, et al., Talanta 153, 130 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Rogova, N. Ryzhakova, A. Borisenko, and N. Sergeeva, in International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM: Surveying Geology & Mining Ecology Management, Sofia, 2016 (SGEM, Sofia, 2016), Vol. 2, p. 163.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. E. Douglass, National Geographic Magazine 56, 736 (1929).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. C. Fritts, Quaternary Research 1, 419 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. A. Vaganov, M. K. Hughes, and A. V. Shashkin, Growth Dynamics of Conifer Tree Rings: Images of Past and Future Environments (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Polge, Tree-Ring Bulletin 30, 1 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. H. Schweingruber, H. C. Fritts, O. U. Bräker, et al., Tree-Ring Bulletin 38, 61 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. M. Cherepennikov, D. Hampai, C. Azzutti, et al., J. Instrum. 13, C07003 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. T. D. Severo, I. Tomaselli, F. W. Calonego, et al., Cerne 19, 637 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. M. Cormack, Med. Phys. 7, 277 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. N. Hounsfield, Med. Phys. 7, 283 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Batranin
    • 1
  • S. L. Bondarenko
    • 2
  • M. A. Kazaryan
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. A. Krasnykh
    • 1
  • I. A. Miloichikova
    • 1
  • S. V. Smirnov
    • 2
  • S. G. Stuchebrov
    • 1
  • Yu. M. Cherepennikov
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological SystemsSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia
  3. 3.Lebedev Physical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations