Advertisement

Optical Memory and Neural Networks

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 170–182 | Cite as

A New Neural Network Classifier Based on Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory

  • Davar Giveki
  • Homayoun Rastegar
  • Maryam Karami
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a new framework for training radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN). Determination of the centers of the Gaussian functions in the hidden layer of RBF neural network highly affects the performance of the network. This paper presents a novel radial basis function using fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm based on Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy set (A-IFS) theory. The A-IFS theory takes into account another uncertainty parameter which is the hesitation degree that arises while defining the membership function and therefore, the cluster centers converge to more desirable locations than the cluster centers obtained using traditional fuzzy C-means algorithm. Furthermore, we make use of a new objective function obtained by Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. This objective function is incorporated in the traditional fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm to maximize the good points in the class. The proposed method is used to improve the functionality of the Optimum Steepest Descent (OSD) learning algorithm. Adjusting RBF units in the network with great accuracy will result in better performance in fewer train iterations, which is essential when fast retraining of the network is needed, especially in the real-time systems. We compare the proposed Atanassov’s intuitionistic radial basis function neural network (A-IRBFNN) with fuzzy C-mean radial basis function neural network (FCMRBFNN) while both methods use OSD learning algorithm. Furthermore, the proposed A-IRBFNN is compared with other powerful fuzzy-based radial basis function neural network. Experimental results on Proben1 dataset and demonstrate the superiority of the proposed A-IRBFNN.

Keywords:

Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy set theory fuzzy C-means radial basis function neural networks optimum steepest descent learning 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for the insightful comments and constructive suggestions. This research was funded by Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Broomhead, D.S. and Lowe, D., Radial basis functions, multi-variable functional interpolation and adaptive networks, Royal Signals and Radar Establishment Malvern (Unites Kingdom), 1988, no. RSRE-MEMO-4148).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powell, M.J., Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: A review, in Algorithms for Approximation, Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 143–167.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dyn, N. and Micchelli, C.A., Interpolation by sums of radial functions, Numerische Mathematik, 1990, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–9.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moody, J. and Darken, C.J., Fast learning in networks of locally-tuned processing units, Neural Comput., 1989, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischler, M.A. and Firschein, O., Parallel guessing: A strategy for high-speed computation, Pattern Recognit., 1987, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haykin, S. and Network, N., A comprehensive foundation, Neural Networks, 2004, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fathi, V. and Montazer, G.A., An improvement in RBF learning algorithm based on PSO for real time applications, Neurocomputing, 2013, vol. 111, pp. 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montazer, G.A., Khoshniat, H., and Fathi, V., Improvement of RBF neural networks using Fuzzy-OSD algorithm in an online radar pulse classification system, Appl. Soft Comput., 2013, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 3831–3838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montazer, G.A. and Giveki, D., An improved radial basis function neural network for object image retrieval, Neurocomputing, 2015, vol. 168, pp. 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atanassov, K.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1986, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bezdek, J.C., Ehrlich, R., and Full, W., FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm, Comput. Geosci., 1984, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaira, T., A novel intuitionistic fuzzy C means clustering algorithm and its application to medical images, Appl. Soft Comput., 2011, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1711–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montazer, G.A., Sabzevari, R., and Ghorbani, F., Three-phase strategy for the OSD learning method in RBF neural networks, Neurocomputing, 2009, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1797–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preehcit, L. and Proben, I., A set of neural networks benchmark problems and benchmarking rules, Univ. Karlsruher, Gerrnany, Teeh. Rep., 2004, vol. 21, p. 94.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asuncion, A. and Newman, D.J., UCI Machine Learning Repository, Univ. California, Irvine, 2007 [Online]. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Box, G., Box and Jenkins: Time series analysis, forecasting and control, A Very British Affair: Six Britons and the Development of Time Series Analysis during the 20th Century, Springer, 2012, p. 161.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman, J.H., Multivariate adaptive regression splines, Ann. Statist., 1991, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–67.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patrinos, P., Alexandridis, A., Ninos, K., and Sarimveis, H., Variable selection in nonlinear modeling based on RBF networks and evolutionary computation, Int. J. Neural Systems, 2010, vol. 20, no. 05, pp. 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loo, C.K., Rajeswari, M., and Rao, M.V.C., Novel direct and self-regulating approaches to determine optimum growing multi-experts network structure, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 2004, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1378–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alexandridis, A., Chondrodima, E., and Sarimveis, H., Radial basis function network training using a nonsymmetric partition of the input space and particle swarm optimization, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2013, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montzer, Gh.A., Soltanshahi, M.A., and Giveki, D., Farsi/Arabic handwritten digit recognition using quantum neural networks and bag of visual words method, Opt. Mem. Neural Networks, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montzer, Gh.A. and Giveki, D., Scene classification using multi-resolution WAHOLB features and neural network classifier, Neural Process. Lett., 2017, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giveki, D., Soltanshahi, M.A., and Montzer, Gh.A., A new image feature descriptor for content based image retrieval using scale invariant feature transform and local derivative pattern, Optik (Munich, Ger.), 2017, vol. 131, pp. 242–254.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montzer, Gh.A., Giveki, D., and Soltanshahi, M.A., Extended bag of visual words for face detection, International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2015, pp. 503–510.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Montzer, Gh.A., Soltanshahi, M.A., and Giveki, D., Scene classification based on local binary pattern and improved bag of visual words, International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 2015, pp. 241–251.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giveki, D., Montzer, Gh.A., and Soltanshahi, M.A., Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy histon for robust moving object detection, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 2017, vol. 91, pp. 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Engineering, Malayer UniversityMalayerIran
  2. 2.Department of Computer Engineering, Afarinesh Institute of Higher EducationBoroujerdIran

Personalised recommendations