Advertisement

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 461–470 | Cite as

MAD-based Estimation of the Noise Level in the Contourlet Domain

  • Abdelhak BouhaliEmail author
  • Daoud BerkaniEmail author
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Noise-level estimation remains one of the most critical issues related to the contourlet-based approaches. In this paper, an investigation of an effective solution is directed from any redundant contourlet expansion. This is going to be addressed for the first time in that domain. In this proposition, the noise level is estimated as the median absolute value (MAD) of the finest multi-scale coefficients, calibrated by three correction parameters. This is done according to some visual classification of the natural images. The present estimator provides a better compromise between the image and the contourlet expansion nature, which makes the estimation results more accurate for a wide range of natural images, when compared to the best state-of-the-art methods. Therefore, it is extensively recommended for most of the contourlet-based image applications (Thresholding, filtering, etc.) thanks to its accuracy, simplicity, and rapidity.

Keywords:

contourlet directional filter bank MAD noise-level estimation thresholding wavelet 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr. Victoriya V. Abramova for providing the basis and the elements of the image classification adopted in this paper.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Yoon, B.J. and Vaidyanathan, P.P., Wavelet based denoising by customized thresholding, ICASSP, 2004, pp. II-925–II-928.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fathi, A. and Nilchi, A.R.N., Efficient image denoising method based on a new adaptive wavelet packet thresholding function, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2012, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3981–3990.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arivazhagan, S., et al., A new hybrid image restoration method based on fusion of spatial and transform domain methods, Int. Conf. on Recent Adv. Comput. and Software, 2012, pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donoho, D.L. and Johnstone, I.M., Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1995, vol. 90, no. 432, pp. 1200–1224.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Stefano, A., White, P., and Collis, W.B., Training methods for image noise level estimation on wavelet components, EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., 2004, vol. 16, pp. 2400–2407.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, C., et al., Noise estimation from a single image, Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006, pp. 901–908.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, C., et al., Automatic estimation and removal of noise from a single image, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2008, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, X., et al., Noise level estimation using weak textured patches of a single noisy image, 19th IEEE Intern. Conf. Image Process, 2012, pp. 665–668.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, X., et al., Single-image noise level estimation for blind denoising, IEEE T Image Process., 2013, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 5226–5237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pyatikh, S., et al., Image noise level estimation by principal component analysis, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2013, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 687–699.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, L. and Lin, W., Adaptive White Gaussian noise level estimation in SVD domain for images, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2013, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 872–883.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, G., et al., An efficient statistical method for image noise level estimation, Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. Computer Vision, 2015, pp. 477–485.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Das, A.K. and Chandle, J.O., Accurate noise level estimation through singular values and linear regression, 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. on Eng. & Tech. (ICETECH), 2016, pp. 1132–1135.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khmag, A., et al., Natural image noise level estimation based on local statistics for blind noise reduction, Visual Comput., 2018, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 575–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kingsbury, N.G., The dual-tree complex wavelet transform: A new technique for shift invariance and directional filters, IEEE Digit. Sig. Proc. Workshop, Bryce Canyon, 1998, pp. 120–131.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Candes, E.J. and Donoho, D.L., Curvelets, multi-resolution representation, and scaling laws, International Symposium on Optical Science and Technology, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2000, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Do, M.N. and Vetterli, M., The contourlet transform an efficient directional multi resolution image representation, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2005, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2091–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Do, M.N., Directional multi-resolution image representation, Ph.D. Dissertation, Lausanne: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu, Y. and Do, M.N., CRISP-contourlet: A critically sampled directional multi-resolution image representation, SPIE Conf. Wavelet Apps. Signal Image Process, San Diego, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu, Y. and Do, M.N., A new contourlet transform with sharp frequency localization, Proc. of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '06), Atlanta, 2006, pp. 1629–1632.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Da Cunha, A.L., et al., The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: Theory, design, and applications, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2006, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 3089–3101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chui, M., et al., Image denoising method with adaptive Bayes threshold in nonsubsampled contourlet domain, AASRI Procedia, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 512–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li, X.F., et al., Intensity image denoising for laser active imaging system using non-subsampled contourlet transform and SURE approach, Optik, 2012, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 808–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, C.J., et al., Image denoising algorithm based on non-subsampled contourlet transform and bilateral filtering, International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Applications, 2015, pp. 666–669.  https://doi.org/10.2991/cisia-15.2015.182.
  25. 25.
    Wang, J. and Zhou, Y., Image denoising based on the symmetric normal inverse Gaussian model and non-subsampled contourlet transform, IET Image Proc., 2012, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1136–1147.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu, J., et al., NSCT remote sensing image denoising based on threshold of free distributed FDR, Procedia Eng., 2011, pp. 616–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao, Q., et al., Mixed image denoising method of non-local means and adaptive Bayesian threshold estimation in NSCT domain, 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. on Comp. Sci. & Inf. Tech, 2010, pp. 636–639.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou, Z., et al., Contourlet-based image denoising algorithm using adaptive windows, 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Ind. Elec. & Apps, 2009, pp. 3654–3657.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bouhali, A. and Berkani, B., Combination of spatial filtering and adaptative wavelet thresholding for image denoising, Int. J. Image Graphics Signal Process, 2017, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 9–19.  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2017.05.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qinli, Z., et al., A novel method of medical image enhancement based on wavelet decomposition, Autom. Cont. Comp. Sci., 2017, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burt, P.J. and Adelson, E.H., The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code, IEEE Trans. Commun., 1983, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bamberger, R.H. and Smith, M.J., T, A filter bank for the directional decomposition of images: Theory and design, IEEE Signal Process., 1992, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 882–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vaidyanathan, P.P., Multirate Systems and Filter Banks, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shensa, M.J., The discrete wavelet transform: Wedding the à trous and Mallat algorithms, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1992, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2464–2482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    A Matlab Contourlet Toolbox. https://www.ifp.uiuc.edu/~minhdo/software.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Donoho, D.L. and Johnstone, I.M., Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika, 1994, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 425–455.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnstone, I.M. and Silverman, B.W., Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 1997, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 319–351.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mallat, S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, 2008, 3rd ed.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rousseau, P.J. and Croux, C., Alternatives to the median absolute deviation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1993, vol. 88, no. 424, pp. 1273–1283.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Signal and Communications Lab., Ecole Nationale PolytechniqueEl HarrachAlgeria

Personalised recommendations