Advertisement

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 465–475 | Cite as

Integrating Laplacian Eigenmaps Feature Space Conversion into Deep Neural Network for Equipment Condition Assessment

  • Sheng GuoEmail author
  • Yafei Sun
  • Fengzhi Wu
  • Yuhong Li
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Reliable equipment condition assessment technique is playing an increasingly important role in modern industry. This paper presents a novel method by integrating Laplacian Eigenmaps (LE) that transforms data features from original high-dimensional space to projected low-dimensional space to extract the more representative features into deep neural network (DNN) for equipment health assessment, in which the bearing run-to-failure data were investigated for validation studies. Through a series of comparison experiments with the original features, two other popular space transformation methods principal component analysis (PCA) and Isometric map (Isomap), and two other artificial intelligence algorithms hidden Markov model (HMM) and back-propagation neural network (BPNN), the proposed method in this paper was proved more effective for equipment condition evaluation.

Keywords:

signal processing laplacian eigenmaps feature space conversion deep neural network state assessment 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Yin, A., Lu, J., Dai, Z., Li, J., and Ouyang, Q., Isomap and deep belief network-based equipment health combined assessment model, Strojniški Vestn., 2016, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 740–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loutridis, S., Instantaneous energy density as a feature for gear fault detection, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2006, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1239–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Öztürk, H., Sabuncu, M., and Yesilyurt, I., Early detection of pitting damage in gears using mean frequency of scalogram, J. Vib. Control, 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 469–484.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loutridis, S., Self-similarity in vibration time series: Application to gear fault diagnostics, J. Vib. Acoust., 2008, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu, D., Yang, Y., and Cheng, J., Application of time-frequency entropy method based on Hilbert–Huang transform to gear fault diagnosis, Measurement, 2007, vol. 40, nos. 9–10, pp. 823–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cui, J. and Wang, Y.R., A novel approach of analog circuit fault diagnosis using support vector machines classifier, Measurement, 2011, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu, J., Ge, Z., and Song, Z., HMM-driven robust probabilistic principal component analyzer for dynamic process fault classification, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2015, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3814–3821.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan, J. and Guo, C., A dynamic multi-scale Markov model based methodology for remaining life prediction, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2011, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1364–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P., Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE, 1998, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tran, V.T., Yang, B.-S., Oh, M.-S., and Tan, A.C.C., Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference, Expert Syst. Appl., 2009, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1840–1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hinton, G.E. and Salakhutdinov, R.R., Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 2006, vol. 313, no. 5786, pp. 504–507.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meng Gan, Cong Wang, and Chang’an Zhu, Construction of hierarchical diagnosis network based on deep learning and its application in the fault pattern recognition of rolling element bearings, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2016, vols. 72–73, no. 2, pp. 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng, Z., Zuo, M.J., and Chu, F., Application of regularization dimension to gear damage assessment, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2010, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1081–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, R., Ingman, D., and Braun, S., Non-stationary signals: Phase-energy approach theory and simulations, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2001, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1061–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baydar, N. and Ball, A., A comparative study of acoustic and vibration signals in detection of gear failures using Wigner–Ville distribution, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2001, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1091–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He, Q.B., Vibration signal classification by wavelet packet energy flow manifold learning, J. Sound Vib., 2013, vol. 332, no. 7, pp. 1881–1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gharavian, M.H., Almas Ganj, F., Ohadi, A.R., et al., Comparison of FDA-Based and PCA-based features in fault diagnosis of automobile gearboxes, Neurocomputing, 2013, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, Z.B. and Song, Z.H., A novel fault diagnosis system using pattern classification on kernel FDA subspace, Expert Syst. Appl., 2011, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 6895–6905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tenenbaum, J.B., Silva, V.D., and Langford, J.C., A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science, 2000, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2319–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Belkin, M. and Niyogi, P., Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation, Neural Comput., 2003, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1373–1396.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roweis, S.T. and Saul, L.K., Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science, 2000, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2323–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hemmatia, F., Orfalib, W., and Gadalaa, M.S., Roller bearing acoustic signature extraction by wavelet packet transform, applications in fault detection and size estimation, Appl. Acoust., 2016, vol. 104, pp. 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hauberg, S., Principal curves on Riemannian manifolds, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Equip. Intell., 2015, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1915–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belkin, M. and Niyogi, P., Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation, Neural Comput., 2003, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1373–1396.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ayyoob, J. and Farshad, A., Using Laplacian eigenmaps latent variable model and manifold learning to improve speech recognition accuracy, Speech Commun., 2010, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 725–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., and Teh, Y.W., A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Comput., 2006, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1527–1554.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tran, V.T., AlThobiani, F., and Ball, A., An approach to fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor valves using Teager-Kaiser energy operator and deep belief networks, Expert Syst. Appl., 2014, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 4113–4122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, J., Qiu, H., Yu, G., and Lin, J., Rexnord Technical Services: Bearing Data Set, Moffett Field, CA: IMS, Univ. Cincinnati. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames, 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering, Cangzhou Technical CollegeCangzhouChina
  2. 2.Natural Energy Course, Faculty of Engineering, Ashikaga Institute of TechnologyTochigikenJapan

Personalised recommendations