Advertisement

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 175–183 | Cite as

Deep Learning and Semantic Concept Spaceare Used in Query Expansion

  • Weijiang Li
  • Sheng Wang
  • Zhengtao Yu
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

In the practice of information retrieval, there are some problems such as the lack of accurate expression of user query requests, the mismatch between document and query and query optimization. Focusing on these problems, we propose the query expansion method based on conceptual semantic space with deep learning, this hybrid query expansion technique include deep learning and pseudocorrelation feedback, use the deep learning and semantic network WordNet to construct query concept tree in the level of concept semantic space, the pseudo-correlation feedback documents are processed by observation window, compute the co-occurrence weight of the words by using the average mutual information and get the final extended words set. The results of experiment show that the expansion algorithm based on conceptual semantic space with deep learning has better performance than the traditional pseudo-correlation feedback algorithm on query expansion.

Keywords

query expansion deep learning semantic space average mutual information observation window expansion algorithm 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wen, K.M., Lu, Z.D., Sun, X.L., and Li, R.X., Research of semantic search: Overview, Comput. Sci., 2008, vol. 5, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maron, M.E. and Kuhns, J.L., On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval, J. ACM, 1960, vol. 3, pp. 216–244.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rocchio, J.J., Document Retrieval Systems-Optimization and Evaluation, Harvard, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ide, E., New experiments in relevance feedback, in The Smart Retrieval System, Saltion, G., Ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: N.J. Prentice Hall Inc., 1971, pp. 337–354.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robertson, S.E. and Jones, K.S., Relevance weighting of search terms, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1976, vol. 3, pp. 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attar, R. and Fraenkel, A.S., Local feedback in full-text retrieval systems, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 1977, vol. 3, pp. 397–417.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, H. and Salton, G., The estimation of term relevance weights using relevance feedback, J. Doc., 1981, vol. 4, pp. 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Croft, W.B., What do people want from information retrieval, D-Lib Mag., 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qiu, Y. and Frei, H.P., Concept Based Query Expansion, 1993, pp. 160–169.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crouch, C.J. and Yang, B., Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction, Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1992, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly, D. and Teevan, J., Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography, ACM SIGIR Forum, 2003, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jung, S., Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search, Inf. Process. Manage., 2007, vol. 3, pp. 791–807.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jing, Y. and Croft, W.B., An Association Thesaurus for Information Retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, X.Y. and Wei, X.X., Query expansion method based on ontology and local co-occurrence, Comput. Sci., 2017, vol. 1, pp. 214–218.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, W.J. and Wang, F., Method of query expansion based on LCA prune semantic tree, Comput. Sci., 2015, vol. 1, pp. 479–483.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, Y.J., Yan, J.F., and Liu, X.S., Social strength learning between users based on spatiotemporal data, Comput. Sci., 2016, vol. 1, pp. 251–254.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan, H.Y., Liu, Q.P., and Xiao, L.J., Survey on relevance feedback for information retrieval, Appl. Res. Comput., 2009, vol. 1, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenfeld, R., A Maximum Entropy Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling, Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering and AutomationKunming University of Science and TechnologyYunnanChina

Personalised recommendations