Advertisement

Moscow University Geology Bulletin

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 185–196 | Cite as

The Maastrichtian–Danian Boundary Deposits of Central Crimea: New Data on Calcareous Nanoplankton

  • E. A. LyginaEmail author
  • M. A. UstinovaEmail author
  • R. R. GabdullinEmail author
  • A. V. ReentovichEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This article discusses the structural peculiarities and new data on the distribution of calcareous nanoplankton from Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary deposits of the central area of Piedmont (Predgornyi) Crimea. Both Maastrichtian and Danian rocks contain abundant Cretaceous nanoplankton assemblages. Danian nanoplankton is scarce, characterized by a poor degree of preservation, or even absent. Upper Maastrichtian rocks contain the species Tranolithus orionatus (=Tranolithus phacelosus Stover), which is typical of the Lower Maastrichtian and unknown in the Upper Maastrichtian of the European section; the only reported section of this age containing this species is in southwestern Tunisia. The NP2–NP4 zones are distinguished in the Danian deposits. The paleogeographic problem is also addressed.

Keywords:

Maastrichtian Danian calcareous nanoplankton Central Crimea 

Notes

FUNDING

This work was carried out in the framework of State Contract no. 0135-2019-0057 and supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects nos. 18-05-00495 and 18-05-00503) and International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme (IGGP, project no. 609).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Andreeva-Grigorovich, A.S., Nannoplankton zonation of the Paleogene deposits in the Bakhisaray area, in Tr. NII Geol. Dnepropetrovsk. Univ. “Stratigrafiya kainozoya Severnogo Prichernomor’ya i Kryma” (Proc. Sci. Inst. Geol. Dnepropetrovsk State Univ. “The Cenozoic Stratigraphy of the North Black Sea and Crimean Regions”), 1980, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astakhova, T.V., Gorak, S.V., Kraeva, E.Ya., et al., Geologiya shel’fa USSR. Stratigrafiya (shel’f i poberezh’ya Chernogo morya) (Geology of Shelf of Ukrainian SSR. Stratigraphy (Shelf and Coasts of the Black Sea)), Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berggren, W.A. and Pearson, P.N., A revised tropical to subtropical Paleogene planktonic foraminiferal zonation, J. Foraminifer. Res., 2005, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Swisher, C.C., et al., A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy, Soc. Econ. Pal. Miner. Spec. Publ., 1995, pp. 129–212.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bugrova, E.M., Problems of distinguishing the boundaries of the ISS subdivisions at the improvement of the Paleogene regional stratigraphic schemes of Russia and CIS countries, in Sb. statei Vseross. konf. “Obshchaya stratigraficheskaya shkala Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy obustroistva” (Proc. All-Russ. Conf. “General Stratigraphic Scale of Russia: Current State and Ways of Perfection”), Fedonkin, M.A., Ed., Moscow, 2013, pp. 329–331.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bugrova, E.M., Zakrevskaya, E.Yu., and Tabachnikova, I.P., New data on Paleogene biostratigraphy of Eastern Crimea, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2002, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83–93.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bugrova, I.Yu. and Bugrova, E.M., Paleocene and Lower Eocene sections in the southern part of the Crimean Peninsula, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2015, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 607–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burnett, J.A., Upper Cretaceous in Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy, Bown, P.R., Ed., London: Chapman and Hall, 1998, pp 132–199.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dmitrenko, O.B., Paleoecological groups of nanoplankton in the Paleogene deposits of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Okeanologiya, 1997, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 578–587.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Favorskaya, T.A., The characteristic bryozoans of the order Cheilostomata from Danian deposits of Mt. Ailyanmakaya (Central Crimea), Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. Geol., 1969, no. 18, pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabdullin, R.R., Shalimov, I.V., Badulina, N.V., et al., A stratigraphic scheme for the division of the Prequaternary deposits of central Crimea, Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2017, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gorbach, L.P., Stratigrafiya i fauna mollyuskov rannego paleotsena Kryma (Early Palaeocene Stratigraphy and Mollusk Fauna of the Crimea), Moscow: Nedra, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorbach, L.P., Favorskaya, T.A., and Shmidt, O.I., The spines of Tylocidaris from Danian deposits of Crimea, Paleontol. Sb., 1974, no. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 50–53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadavi, F., Moghaddam, M.N., and Khodadadi, L., Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Cretaceous rocks based on calcareous nannofossil in Sarayan section, East Iran, Iran. J. Earth Sci., 2016, no. 8, pp. 52–68.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haq, B.U., Paleogene calcareous nannoflora. P. I–IV, Stocholm Contrib.Geol., 1971, vol. 25, pp. 1–158.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Heck, S.E. and Prins, B., A refined nannoplankton zonation for the Danian of the Central North Sea, Abh. Geol. Bundesanst., 1987, vol. 39, pp. 285–303.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kopaevich, L.F., Lygina, E.A., Yakovishin, E.V., and Shalimov, I.V., Danian deposits of the Crimea: Facies peculiarities and conditions of sediment accumulation, Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2010, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuz’micheva, E.I., Melovye i paleogenovye korally SSSR (Cretaceous and Paleogene Corals of the USSR), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linnert, C., Introduction, in Case Studies of Late Cretaceous Calcareous Nannofossils – Implications for the Cenomanian–Maastrichtian Palaeoceanography of the Proto-North Atlantic: Dissert. zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doctors der Naturwissenschaften der Facultat fur Geowissenschaften der Ruhr-Universitat Bohum, 2010, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linnert, C., Mutterlose, J., and Herrle, J., Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Maastrichtian) calcareous nannofossils from Goban Spur (DSDP holes 549; 551): implications for the palaeoceanography of the proto-North Atlantic, in Case Studies of Late Cretaceous Calcareous Nannofossils – Implications for the Cenomanian–Maastrichtian Palaeoceanography of the Proto-North Atlantic: Dissert. zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doctors der Naturwissenschaften der Facultat fur Geowissenschaften der Ruhr-Universitat Bohum, 2010, pp. 88–117.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lygina, E.A., Lithological characteristic and conditions of formation of Danian deposits in the Burunduk-Kaya area (Central Crimea), Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2009, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lygina, E.A., The Danian and Eocene carbonate platforms of Crimea: structure and sedimentation conditions, Cand. (Geol.-Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mahanipour, A. and Najafpour, A., Calcareous nannofossil assemblages of the Late Campanian–Early Maastrichtian from Gupri Formation (Dezful embayment, SW Iran): Evidence of a climate cooling event, Geopersia, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 129–148.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martini, E., Standard tertiary and quaternary calcareous nannoplankton zonation, in Proc. Second Planktonic Conf., Roma 2. Farinacci, A., Ed., Rome: Edizioni Technoscienza, pp. 739–785.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maslakova, N.I., The Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy of Northern Caucasus and Crimea. Crimea, in Atlas verkhnemelovoi fauny Severnogo Kavkaza i Kryma (Atlas of Upper Cretaceous Fauna of Northern Caucasus and Crimea), Moscow: Gostoptekhizdat, 1959, pp. 60–84.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maslakova, N.I. and Voloshina, A.M., Cretaceous System, in Geologiya SSSR. T. 8. Krym. Ch. 1. Geologicheskoe opisanie (Geology of the USSR. Vol. 8. Crimea. Pt. 1. Geological Description), Moscow: Nedra, 1969, pp. 198–200.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morozova, V.G., Stratigraphy of Danian and Monsian deposits of Crimea based on foraminifers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1959, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 1113–1118.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morozova, V.G., Zonal stratigraphy of Danian–Monsian deposits of the USSR and the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, in Dokl. sov. geologov na XXI Sess. Mezhdunar. Geol. Kongr. Probl. 5. “Granitsa melovykh i tretichnykh otlozhenii” (Proc. Int. Geol. Congr., XXI Sess. Dokl. Sov. Geol., Probl. 5 “Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary Deposits”), Moscow, 1960, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mortimer, Ch.P., Upper Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Southern Norwegian and Danish North Sea area, Abh. Geol. Bundesanst., 1987, vol. 39, pp. 143–175.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moskvin, M.M. and Naidin, D.P., The Danian and boundary deposits in the Crimea, Caucasus, Trans-Caspian Region and the southeastern part of the Russian Platform, in Dokl. sov. geologov na XXI Sess. Mezhdunar. Geol. Kongr. Probl. 5. “Granitsa melovykh i tretichnykh otlozhenii” (Proc. Int. Geol. Congr., XXI Sess. Dokl. Sov. Geol., Probl. 5 “Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary Deposits”), Moscow: Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muzylev, N.G., Paleogene nannoplankton stratigraphy of the South USSR (Northern Caucasus and Crimea), in Tr. GIN Akad. Nauk SSSR. Vyp. 348 (Trans. Geol. Inst. USSR Acad. Sci. Vol. 348), 1980, no. 348.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Naidin, D.P., Danian and Monsian deposits of Crimea, in Sb. v chest’ akad. I.S. Iovcheva (Coll. Sci. Works in Honor of Acad. I. S. Yovichev), Sofia, 1964, pp. 167–183.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Naidin, D.P. and Beniamovsky, V.N., On the upper boundary of the Danian Stage. Pt. 2. Danian, Monsian and Selandian beyond the stratotype areas, Izv. VUZov. Geol. Razv., 1989, no. 1, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Naidin, D.P. and Beniamovsky, V.N., Stratification of Palaeogene, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2000, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ovechkina, M.N., Izvestkovyi nanoplankton verkhnego mela (kampan i maastrikht) yuga i vostoka Russkoi plity (Calcareous Nannoplankton of the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) from the South and East of the Russian Platform), Moscow: Nauka, 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poslavskaya, N.A. and Moskvin, M.M., Echinoids of the order Spatangoida in the Danian and adjacent beds of the Crimea, Caucasus, and Trans-Caspian Region, in Dokl. sov. geologov na XXI Sess. Mezhdunar. Geol. Kongr. Probl. 5. “Granitsa melovykh i tretichnykh otlozhenii” (Proc. Int. Geol. Congr., XXI Sess. Dokl. Sov. Geol., Probl. 5 “Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary Deposits”), Moscow, 1960, pp. 47-82.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po mikrofaune. T. 8. Foraminifery kainozoya (Guidebook of Microfauna. Vol. 8. Cenozoic Foraminifers), Bugrova, E.M., Ed., St. Petersburg: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst., 2005.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Preobrazhenskii, M.B. and Bugrova, E.M., Facies characteristic of the zone of carbonate sedimentation of Early Palaeocene basin of the southwestern Crimea (based on the data of microfacies analysis), in Geologiya Kryma. Uch. Zap. kaf. istor. geologii. Vyp. 2 (Geology of Crimea. Bull. Hist. Geol. Chair. Vol. 2), St. Petersburg: NIIZK S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2002, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ryabokon’, T.S., Paleocene–Eocene biostratigraphy of the South Ukraine based on planktonic foraminifers. Pt. 1. Zonal subdivision of the Paleoecene, Geologiya ta rudonosnist’ Ukraïni, 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shimanskii, V.N. and Alekseev, A.S., Rhyncholiths from the Danian Stage deposits of Crimea, in Razvitie i smena organicheskogo mira na rubezhe mezozoya i kainozoya. Novye dannye o razvtie fauny (Development and Change of the Organic World at the Mesozoic–Cenozoic Boundary. New Data on the Evolution of Fauna), Moscow: Nauka, 1975, pp. 87–90.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shumenko, S.I., Calcareous nannoplankton, in Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po mikrofaune SSSR. Tom 1 (Practical Manual on Microfauna of the USSR, Vol. 1), Leningrad: Nedra, 1987.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shumenko, S.I. and Stetsenko, V.P., Zonal distribution of Late Cretaceous deposits of Crimea based on calcareous nannofossils, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1978a, vol. 241, no. 5, pp. 1160–1162.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shumenko, S.I. and Stetsenko, V.P., Calcareous nannofossils in Upper Cretaceous deposits of Crimea, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1978b, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 130–137.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shutskaya, E.K., Lower Paleogene stratigraphy, foraminifers and paleogeography of Crimea, Cis-Caucasus and the West Central Asia, in Tr. VNIGNI (Trans. All-Russ. Res. Geol. Oil Inst.), 1970, no. 70.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suprun, I.S., Paleoecological analysis of nannoplankton from Paleocene basins of some regions of the Tethyan province, Algologiya, 2015, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 406–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Suprun, I.S., Nannoplankton biostratigraphy of Paleogene deposits of Ukraine (history of study, stratification), Geol. J., 2017, no. 4 (361), pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Takahashi-Shimase, K. and Nakashima, S., Dissolution behavior of calcareous nannoplankton and possible alteration of their assemblages, J. Taphonomy, 2006, vol. 4, Iss. I, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    The Geologic Time Scale. Paleogene Period. Ch. 28, Gradstein, F.M., , Eds., Elsevier, 2012, pp. 854–921.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thibault, N., Galbrun, B., Gardin, S., et al., The end-Cretaceous in the southwestern Tethys (Elles, Tunisia): orbital calibration of paleoenvironmental events before the mass extinction, Int. J. Earth Sci., 2015, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Titova, M.V. and Favorskaya, T.A., About Danian craniids of Crimea, Byull. Mosk. O–va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1983, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 101–112.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vaga, D.D., Andreeva-Grigorovich, A.S., and Suprun, I.S., Regional significance and volumes of hiatuses/unconformities in the Paleogene deposits of the Northern Tethyan Realm, in Problemy i Perspektivy Neftegazovoi Promyshlennosti (Problems and Perspectives of the Petroleum Industry), 2017, no. 1, pp. 72–100.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Varol, O., Palaeogene in Calcareous Nannofossil Biostratigraphy, Bown, P.R., Ed., London: Chapman and Hall, 1998, pp. 200–225.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Verbeek, J.W., Calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy of Middle and Upper Cretaceous deposits in Tunisia, Southern Spain and France, Utrecht Micropaleontol. Bull., 1977, vol. 16.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wosabi, K.A.Al., Calcareous nannofossils biostratigraphy and paleoecology of the Late Paleocene–Early Eocene of Wadi Nukhul, Westcentral Sinai, Egypt Earth Sci., 2015, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yakovishina, E.V., Structure and formation conditions of Upper Maastrichtian carbonate deposits of Crimea, Cand. (Geol.–Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2006.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zernetskii, B.F., Lyul’eva, S.A., and Ryabokon, T.S., The analysis of the Bakhchisarai stratotype of the Paleogene of Ukraine from the standpoint of modern zonal biostratigraphy, Geol. J., 2003, no. 3, pp. 98–108.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zernyetskiy, T.S., Ryabokon, S.A., and Lulyeva, S.A., Questions studying of the Paleocene sedimentary complex of the Crimea and Kerch peninsula, Zb. Nauk. prats’ Inst. geol. nauk NAN Ukraïni, 2014, vol. 7, pp. 101–125.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zonal’naya stratigrafiya fanerozoya Rossii (Zonal Phanerozoic Stratigraphy of Russia), St. Petersburg: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst., 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations