Estimation of the Deformation Value in Terrigenous Rocks by the Random Cross-Section Method (Belaya River, Northern Slope of the Greater Caucasus)
The deformation value in the Lower and Middle Jurassic terrigenous rocks from the valley of the Belaya River (the northern slope of the Greater Caucasus) is quantified by the morpholology of the cleavage zones. The numeral determination of the axis ratios of the deformation ellipses by the Fry method is performed as well. It is shown that for a statistical sample of the random cross-sections of the thin sections in the terrigenous rocks with cleavage structure the deformation value can be estimated correctly. The method of random cross-sections described in this work can be used for the quantitative estimation of deformation in nonoriented samples of terrigenous rocks.
Keywordscleavage strain analysis value of shortening deformation Fry method terrigenous rocks the Greater Caucasus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Galkin, V.A., Microdeformations in unaltered and weakly metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanogenic rocks and their implications for structural analysis (with reference to the Tien Shan and Caucasus). Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geol.–Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1988.Google Scholar
- Gavrilov, Yu.O., Galkin, V.A., Panov, D.I., and Talitskii, V.G., Lithological–Mineralogical and structural-geological features of the Lower–Middle Jurassic terrigenous complex of the Greater Caucasus (Terek River area), Litol. Polezn. Iskop., 1999, no. 1, pp. 58–77.Google Scholar
- Goncharov, M.A., Talitskii, V.G., and Frolova, N.S., Vvedenie v tektonofiziku (Introduction to Tectonophysics), Moscow: KDU, 2005.Google Scholar
- Kirmasov, A.B., Osnovy strukturnogo analiza (Principles of Structural Analysis), Moscow: Nauchn. Mir, 2011.Google Scholar
- Nikolas, A., Principles of Rock Deformation, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Comp., 1992.Google Scholar
- Panov, D.I. and Gushchin, A.I., Early and Middle Jurassic lithotectonic zoning of the Greater Caucasus and regional stratigraphic subdivision of the Lower–Middle Jurassic rocks, in Geologiya i poleznye iskopaemye Bol’shogo Kavkaza (Geology and Mineral Resources of the Greater Caucasus), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 124–139.Google Scholar
- Passchier, C.W. and Trouw, R.A.J., Microtectonics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
- Ramsey, J.G. and Huber, M.I., The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Vol. 1. Strain Analysis, London: Acad. Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Rostovtsev, K.O., Stratigraphy of Lower to Middle Jurassic deposits of the Guzeripl’ subzone of the northern slope of the Greater Caucasus, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geol., 1967, no. 2, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
- Talitskii, V.G., Relationship between cleavage and folds (genetic aspects), Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 4: Geol., 1989, no. 4, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
- Talitskii, V.G. and Galkin, V.A., Structural organization of geologic medium and some regularities of its dynamic rearrangements, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 4: Geol., 1997, no. 2, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
- Voitenko, V.N. and Khudolei, A.K., Strain-analysis at geotectonic studies, in Problemy tektonofiziki. K 40-letiyu sozdaniya M.V. Gzovskim laboratorii tektonofiziki v IFZ RAN (Problems of Tectonophysics. To the 40th anniversary of Laboratory of Tectonophysics in IPE RAS founded by M.V. Gzovsky), Moscow: IFZ RAN, 2008, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar