Advertisement

Permeability of the Plasma Membrane for Propidium Iodide and Destruction of Cell Nuclei in the Epidermis of Pea Leaves: The Effect of Polyelectrolytes and Detergents

  • D. B. KiselevskyEmail author
  • V. D. Samuilov
RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Damage to the plasma membrane (PM) of cells in pea leaf epidermis determined by its permeability to propidium iodide (PI), which binds to DNA of cell nuclei, and programmed cell death (PCD) detected by the destruction of cell nuclei were investigated. PM of the epidermal cells in the isolated epidermis was permeable to PI (it stained their nuclei). PM of the guard cells did not allow PI to pass through. KCN, an inducer of PCD, caused the destruction of both epidermal and guard cell nuclei. KCN-induced destruction of guard cell nuclei was accompanied by the penetration of PI into the cells. The polycation chitosan at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL caused the destruction of the epidermal cell nuclei, but the permeability of the guard cell PM for PI staining their nuclei was induced at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Other polycations (cytochrome c, polylysine, polyethylenimine, and protamine) also caused staining of the guard cell nuclei by PI. Polyanions (polyacrylic acid, dextran, and heparin) initiated the destruction of cell nuclei, which was accompanied by the penetration of PI into cells. Detergents Triton X-100 and lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide produced the permeability of the guard cell PM for PI and prevented the destruction of the nuclei that was induced by KCN. Treatment of the epidermis with Triton X-100 (for 2 h with its subsequent washing) increased the destruction of the guard cell nuclei that was caused by KCN. Polycations polyethyleneimine and protamine were prevented, while chitosan, cytochrome c, and polylysine, on the contrary, enhanced KCN-induced destruction of the guard cell nuclei. The obtained data shows that the destruction of cell nuclei upon induction of cell death with KCN or polyanions is accompanied by damage to PM (producing its permeability for PI). Damage to PM caused by detergents or polycations prior to cell treatment by KCN can prevent or, on the contrary, intensify the destruction of cell nuclei.

Keywords:

programmed cell death plasma membrane detergents polyelectrolytes chitosan propidium iodide. 

Notes

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Federal Budget of the Russian Federation (registration no. in CITIS: АААА-А16-116021660081-0).

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

The authors carried out no experiments with either animals or human beings as objects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    van Doorn, W.G., Beers, E.P., Dangl, J.L., et al., Morphological classification of plant cell deaths, Cell Death Differ., 2011, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1241–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L., Vandenabeele, P., et al., Classification of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009, Cell Death Differ., 2009, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Gueydan, C., and Han, J., Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths, Cell Res., 2018, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Julien, O. and Wells, J.A., Caspases and their substrates, Cell Death Differ., 2017, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1380–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chichkova, N.V., Tuzhikov, A.I., Taliansky, M., and Vartapetian, A.B., Plant phytaspases and animal caspases: Structurally unrelated death proteases with a common role and specificity, Physiol. Plant., 2012, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas, E.L. and van der Hoorn, R.A.L., Ten prominent host proteases in plant-pathogen interactions, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2018, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samuilov, V.D., Lagunova, E.M., Kiselevsky, D.B., Dzyubinskaya, E.V., Makarova, Ya.V., and Gusev, M.V., Participation of chloroplasts in plant apoptosis, Biosci. Rep., 2003, vol. 23, nos. 2–3, pp. 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dzyubinskaya, E.V., Kiselevsky, D.B., Bakeeva, L.E., and Samuilov, V.D., Programmed cell death in plants: Effect of protein synthesis inhibitors and structural changes in pea guard cells, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2006, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 395–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dzyubinskaya, E.V., Kiselevsky, D.B., Lobysheva, N.V., Shestak, A.A., and Samuilov, V.D., Death of stoma guard cells in leaf epidermis under disturbance of energy provision, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2006, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1120–1127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bakeeva, L.E., Dzyubinskaya, E.V., and Samuilov, V.D., Programmed cell death in plants: Ultrastructural changes in pea guard cells, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2005, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 972–979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiselevsky, D.B., Kuznetsova, Y.E., Vasil’ev, L.A., Lobysheva, N.V., Zinovkin, R.A., Nesov, A.V., Shestak, A.A., and Samuilov, V.D., Effect of Ca2+ on programmed death of guard and epidermal cells of pea leaves, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2010, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 614–622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vasil’ev, L.A., Dzyubinskaya, E.V., Zinovkin, R.A., Kiselevsky, D.B., Lobysheva, N.V., and Samuilov, V.D., Chitosan-induced programmed cell death in plants, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2009, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1035–1043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, B., Li, J.-F., Ao, Y., Qu, J., Li, Z., Su, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Feng, D., Qi, K., He, Y., Wang, J., and Wang, H.-B., Lysin motif-containing proteins LYP4 and LYP6 play dual roles in peptidoglycan and chitin perception in rice innate immunity, Plant Cell, 2012, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 3406–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadwiger, L.A., Multiple effects of chitosan on plant systems: Solid science or hype, Plant Sci., 2013, vol. 208, pp. 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Artemov, A.V. and Samuilov, V.D., Effect of polyelectrolytes on serine proteinase secretion by Bacillus subtilis,FEBS Lett., 1990, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prevette, L.E., Mullen, D.G., and Banaszak Holl, M.M., Polycation-induced cell membrane permeability does not enhance cellular uptake or expression efficiency of delivered DNA, Mol. Pharm., 2010, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 870–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young, D.H., Köhle, H., and Kauss, H., Effect of chitosan on membrane permeability of suspension-cultured Glycine max and Phaseolus vulgaris cells, Plant Physiol., 1982, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1449–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kiselevsky, D.B., Frolova, O.Y., Solovyev, A.G., Dorokhov, Y.L., Morozov, S.Y., and Samuilov, V.D., Plant cell death caused by fungal, bacterial, and viral elicitors: Protective effect of mitochondria-targeted quinones, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2014, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 1322–1332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodi, P.M., Bocco Gianello, M.D., Corregido, M.C., and Gennaro, A.M., Comparative study of the interaction of CHAPS and Triton X-100 with the erythrocyte membrane, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2014, vol. 1838, no. 3, pp. 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Darzynkiewicz, Z., Bruno, S., Del Bino, G., Gorczyca, W., Hotz, M.A., Lassota, P., and Traganos, F., Features of apoptotic cells measured by flow cytometry, Cytometry, 1992, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 795–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luttge, U. and Higinbotham, N., Transport in Plants, New York: Springer Verlag, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iriti, M., Sironi, M., Gomarasca, S., Casazza, A.P., Soave, C., and Faoro, F., Cell death-mediated antiviral effect of chitosan in tobacco, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2006, vol. 44, nos. 11–12, pp. 893–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, X., Li, X.H., Ma, X., Wang, Z.H., Lu, S., and Guo, Y.L., Redox-induced apoptosis of human oocytes in resting follicles in vitro, J. Soc. Gynecol. Invest., 2006, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Balhorn, R., The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins, Genome Biol., 2007, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vuorimaa-Laukkanen, E., Lisitsyna, E.S., Ketola, T.M., Morin-Pickardat, E., Liang, H., Hanzlikova, M., and Yliperttula, M., Difference in the core-shell dynamics of polyethyleneimine and poly(l-lysine) DNA polyplexes, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2017, vol. 103, pp. 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Immunology, School of Biology, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations