Advertisement

Moscow University Physics Bulletin

, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 100–114 | Cite as

The Diversity of Nuclear Degrees of Freedom in the 44Ti Nucleus

  • S. S. Belyshev
  • B. S. Ishkhanov
  • D. E. LanskoyEmail author
  • T. Yu. TretyakovaEmail author
The Physics of the Atomic Nucleus and Elementary Particles (Review)
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

A review of the theoretical studies of the 44Ti nuclear spectrum is given. In this example the diversity of nuclear degrees of freedom in complex nuclei and coexistence of excitation of different nature are demonstrated. The main attention is paid to the cluster model 40Ca + α and the shell model. In the latter case the calculation result and the detailed analysis of the role of nucleon pairing are presented. Similarities and differences in the spectra obtained in these approaches are considered. Rotational states and states of the molecular type are also briefly discussed. It is shown that many properties of the spectrum can be reasonably described in various models, which, therefore, are not completely independent and express the same physical phenomena in some cases.

Keywords

nuclear energy levels shell model cluster model nucleon pairing 44Ti 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (W. A. Benjamin, New York, Amsterdam, 1969), Vol. 1.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    J. Chen, B. Singh, and J.A. Cameron, Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2357 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. G. Neudachin and Yu. F. Smirnov, Nucleon Associations in Light Nuclei (Nauka, Moscow, 1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Motoba and K. Itonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 65, 136 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Wada and H. Horiuchi, Phys. Rev. C 38, 2063 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Kimura and H. Horiuchi, Nucl. Phys. A 767, 58 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Michel, S. Ohkubo, and G. Reidemeister, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 132, 7 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Agneli and K. P. Marinova, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 69 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. G. Neudatchin, V. I. Kukulin, V. L. Korotkikh, and V. P. Korennov, Phys. Lett. B 34, 581 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Buck, H. Friedrich, and C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys. A 275, 246 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Yamaya, K. Katori, M. Fujiwara, et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 132, 73 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Sakuda and S. Ohkubo, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 132, 103 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Wildermuth and Y. C. Tang, A Unified Theory of the Nucleus (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, Phys. Rev. C 51, 559 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Horiuchi and K. Ikeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 277 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Chiba, M. Kimura, and Y. Taniguchi, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034319 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. D. O’Leary, M. A. Bentley, B. A. Brown, et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 064314 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Roshanbakht and M. R. Shojaei, Commun. Theor. Phys. 70, 67 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Yamada and S. Ohkubo, Z. Phys. A 349, 363 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Ohkubo, Y. Hirabayashi, and T. Sakuda, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2760 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Astier, P. Petkov, M.-G. Porquet, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 042701 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Suzuki and S. Ohkubo, Phys.Rev. C 82, 041303 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Sakuda and S. Ohkubo, Z. Phys. A 349, 361 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Mohr, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 23 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Mohr, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 209 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. J. Simpson, W. R. Dixon, and R. S. Storey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 946 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Inakura, S. Mizutori, M. Yamagami, and K. Matsuyanagi, Nucl. Phys. A 710, 261 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. Heyde and J. L. Wood, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1467 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. J. Rowe and J. L. Wood, J. Phys. G 45, 06LT01 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. Ha, M K. Cheoun, H. Sagawa, and W. Y. So, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064322 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    L. B. Hubbard, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 9, 85 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. S. Towner, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 67, 71 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Kingan and L. Zamick, Phys. Rev. C 97, 014501 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    B. S. Ishkhanov, M. E. Stepanov, and T. Yu. Tretyakova, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 69, 1 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134914010068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Wang, G. Audi, F. G. Kondev, et al., Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    L. T. Imasheva, B. S. Ishkhanov, M. E. Stepanov, and T. Yu. Tretyakova, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 79, 521 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. T. Imasheva, B. S. Ishkhanov, S. V. Sidorov, M. E. Stepanov, and T. Yu. Tretyakova, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 80, 313 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    L. T. Imasheva, B. S. Ishkhanov, S. V. Sidorov, M. E. Stepanov, and T. Yu. Tretyakova, Phys. Part. Nucl. 48, 889 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    D. G. Madland and J. R. Nix, Nucl. Phys. A 476, 1 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. J. Brussaard and P. W. M. Glaudemans, Shell Model Applications in Nuclear Spectroscopy (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    B. S. Ishkhanov, S. V. Sidorov, and T. Yu. Tretyakova, Uch. Zap. Fiz. Fak. Mosk. Gos. Univ., No. 3, 1810201 (2018).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. Chen and B. Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 135, 1 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Rapaport, J. B. Ball, R. L. Auble, et al., Phys. Rev. C 5, 453 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. C. Zheng, D. Berdichevsky, and L. Zamick, Phys. Rev. C 38, 437 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    K. Itonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 2103 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations