Advertisement

Moscow University Physics Bulletin

, Volume 73, Issue 6, pp 674–677 | Cite as

Calculation of the Thermoelectric Characteristics of Lead Telluride at a High Level of Acceptor Doping

  • A. V. DmitrievEmail author
CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The thermoelectric properties of p-РbТе were studied theoretically at the level of acceptor doping within 5 × 1019 to 4 × 1020 cm–3 and in the 300–900 K temperature range. The three-band model of the electron energy spectrum of PbTe that was used in the calculations includes not only the bands of light electrons and holes in L-points of Brillouin zone but also the band of heavy holes in its Σ-points. The heavy Σ-band plays an important role in increasing the thermoelectric figure of merit of this material at high levels of acceptor doping. The calculated values of thermoelectric characteristics are very sensitive to the doping level. The calculations revealed that thermoelectric figure of merit increases with the doping level up to ZT ≈ 1.3 at 900 К. This maximum is located near the temperature at which the peaks of the bands of light and heavy holes coincide in energy and sharp singularity of density of states arises in the valence band; the Fermi energy is not far from the singularity.

Keywords:

PbTe lead telluride high levels of acceptor doping thermoelectric properties, three band model thermoelectric figure of merit 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    T. M. Tritt and M. A. Subramanian, MRS Bull. 31, 188 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Ohita, Mater. Today 10, 44 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Dmitriev and I. P. Zvyagin, Phys.-Usp. 53, 789 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Ishida, T. Yamada, D. Cao, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 106, 023718 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Andrulakis, I. Todorov, D.-Y. Chung, et al., Phys. Rev. B 82, 115209 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Pei, A. LaLonde, S. Iwanga, and G. J. Snyder, Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 2085 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Preier, Appl. Phys. 20, 189 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z. Gibbs, H. Kim, H. Wang, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 262109 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. I. Babenko and A. V. Dmitriev, J. Appl. Phys. 121, 025704 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. F. Mott and H. Jones, The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys (Clarendon, Oxford, 1936).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. I. Babenko and A. V. Dmitriev, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 72, 582 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.3103/S0027134917060029ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. I. Babenko and A. V. Dmitriev, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 72, 587 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.3103/S0027134917060030ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. V. Dmitriev and E. S. Tkacheva, J. Electron. Mater. 43, 1280 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Dmitriev and E. S. Tkacheva, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 69, 243 (2014). https://doi.org/ 10.3103/S0027134914030072ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. D. Beneslavskii and A. V. Dmitriev, Solid State Commun. 32, 1175 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations