, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 212–220 | Cite as

Behavior of various Nigerian quartz samples to repeated irradiation and heating

  • Ebenezer O. OniyaEmail author
  • George S. Polymeris
  • Nestor C. Tsirliganis
  • George Kitis
Research Article


In the present work the sensitization of the entire glow-curve is studied in 6 different quartz samples of Nigerian origin. The investigation was applied to the un-fired “as is” samples as well as to samples fired at 900°C for 1 hour following cooling to room temperature. The results showed that in the case of “as is” glow-curve is sensitized as a whole. There is an abrupt transition from the “natural” sensitivity without any previous heating and the artificial sensitivity induced after the first heating. The sensitization is growing up strongly to the 10th heating but to a lower rate. The sensitization factor of the TL glow-peak at “110°C” was found to be linearly correlated to the higher temperature TL peaks. In the case of annealed samples there is an initial increase between the sensitivity immediately after the end of annealing and after the first heating. As the number of heating is increased up to the 10th heating the sensitization is stabilized at a constant value. The results are discussed in the frame-work of existing models and implications of the sensitization effect in various applications, while some explanations are attempted.


Quartz Thermoluminescence 110°C TL glow peak High Temperature TL peaks (HTTLPS) Pre-dose effect Sensitization luminescence centre defects 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Afouxenidis D, Stefanaki EC, Polymeris GS, Sakalis A, Tsirliganis NC and Kitis G, 2007. TL/OSL properties of natural schist for archaelogical dating and retrospective dosimetry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 580(1): 705–709, 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey RM, 2001. Towards a general kinetic model for optically and thermally stimulated luminescence of quartz. Radiation Measurements 33(1): 17–45, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00100-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailiff IK, 1994. The pre-dose technique. Radiation Measurements 23(2–3): 471–479, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90081-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bøtter-Jensen L, Bulur E, Duller GAT and Murray AS, 2000. Advances in luminescence instrument systems. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 523–528, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00039-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bøtter-Jensen L, Larsen NA, Mejdahl V, Poolton NRJ, Morris MF and McKeever SWS, 1995. Luminescence sensitivity changes in quartz as a result of annealing. Radiation Measurements. 24(4): 535–541, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(95)00006-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charitidis C, Kitis G, Furetta C and Charalambous S, 1999. Superlinerity of quartz: dependence on pre-dose. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 84(1–4): 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charitidis C, Kitis G, Furetta C and Charalambous S, 2000. Superlinerity of synthetic quartz: dependence on the firing temperature. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 168(3): 404–410, DOI 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)01199-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen G and Li SH, 2000. Studies of quartz 110°C thermoluminescence peak sensitivity change and its relevance to optically stimulated luminescence dating. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 33(4): 437–443, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/33/4/318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Correcher V, Garcia-Guinea J, Bustillo MA and Garcia R, 2009. Study of the thermoluminescence emission of a natural a-cristobalite. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids 164(1): 59–67, 10.1080/10420150802270995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Lima JF, Navarro MS and Valerio MEG, 2002. Effects of thermal treatment on the TL emission of natural quartz. Radiation Meas-urements. 35(2): 155–159, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(01)00283-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duller GAT, 1991. Equivalent dose determination using single aliquot. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 18(4): 371–378, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90002-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin AD, Prescott JR and Scholefield RB, 1995. The mechanism of thermoluminescence in an Australian sedimentary quartz. Journal of Luminescence 63(5–6): 317–326, DOI 10.1016/0022-2313(94)00068-N.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Guinea J, Correcher V, Sanchez-Muñoz L, Finch AA, Hole DE and Townsend PD, 2007. On the luminescence emission band at 340 nm of stressed tectosilicate lattices. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 580(1): 648–651, 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guzzo PL, Khoury HJ, Souza CP, Sóuza AM Jr, Schwartz MOE and Azevedo WM, 2006. Defect analysis in natural quartz from Brazilian sites for ionizing radiation dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 119(1–4): 168–171, DOI 10.1093/rpd/nci573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han ZY, Li SH and Tso MYW, 2000. Effect of annealing on Tl sensitivity of granic qartz. Radiation Measurements 32(3): 227–231, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00270-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Itoh N, 2002. Ionic and electronic processses in quartz: mechanisms of thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence. Journal of Applied Physics 92(9): 5036–5044, DOI 10.1063/1.1510951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain M, Murray AS and Botter-Jensen L, 2003. Characterization of blue-light stimulated luminescence components in different quartz sample: implication for dose measurement. Radiation Measurements 37(4–5): 441–449, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00052-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaylor RM, Feathers J, Hornyak WF and Franklin AD, 1995. Optically stimulated luminescence in Kalahari quartz: bleaching of the 325°C peak as the source of the luminescence. Journal of Luminescence 65(1): 1–6, DOI 10.1016/0022-2313(95)00048-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khoury HJ, Guzzo PL, Brito SB and Hazin CA, 2007. Effect of high gamma doses on the sensitization of natural quartz used for thermoluminescence dosimetry. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids 162(2): 101–107, 10.1080/10420150601035490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitis G, Kiyak NG, Polymeris GS and Tsirliganis NC, 2010. The correlation of fast OSL component with the TL peak at 325°C in quartz of various origins. Journal of Luminescence 130(2): 298–303, 10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiyak NG, Polymeris GS and Kitis G, 2007. Component resolved OSL dose response and sensitization of various sedimentary quartz samples. Radiation Measurements 42(2): 144–155, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.02.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koul DK, Polymeris GS, Tsirliganis NC, Kitis G, 2010. Possibility of pure thermal sensitization in the pre-dose mechanism of the 110°C TL peak of quartz. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(5): 493–498, 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koul DK, Adamiec G and Chougaonkar MP, 2009. Participation of the R-centres in the sensitization of the OSL signal. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 42: 115110, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/42/11/115110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koul DK and Chougaonkar MP, 2007. The pre-dose phenomenon in the OSL signal of quartz. Radiation Measurements 42(8): 1265–1272, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koul DK, 2008. 110°C TL glow peak of quartz — a brief review. Pramana 71: 1209–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krbetschek MR, Gotze J, Dietrich A and Trautmann T, 1997. Spectral information from minerals relevant for luminescence dating. Radiation Measurements 27(5–6) 695–748, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00223-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li SJ and Chen G, 2001. Studies of thermal stability of trapped charges associated OSL from quartz. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 34: 493–498, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/34/4/309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liritzis Y, 1982. Non-linear TL response of quartz grains: some annealing experiments. PACT 6: 209–213.Google Scholar
  29. Martini M, Paleari A, Spinolo G and Vedda A, 1995. Role of [AlO4]0 centers in the 380-nm thermoluminescence of quartz. Physical Review B 51: 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray AS and Roberts RG, 1998. Measurement of the equivalent dose in quartz using a regenerative-dose single aliquot protocol. Radiation Measurements 29(5): 503–515, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(98)00044-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ogundare FO, Chithambo ML and Oniya EO, 2006. Anomalous behaviour of thermoluminescence from quartz: A case of glow peaks from a Nigerian quartz. Radiation Measurements 41(5): 549–553 DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pagonis V, Tatsis E, Kitis G and Drupieki GC, 2002. Radiation Protection and Dosimetry 100(1–4): 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Polymeris G, Kitis G and Pagonis V, 2006. The effects of annealing and irradiation on the sensitivity and superlinearity properties of the 110°C thermoluminescence peak of quartz. Radiation Measurements 41(5): 554–564, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preusser F, Chithambo ML, Götte T, Martini M, Ramseyer K, Sendezera EJ. Susino GJ and Wintle AG, 2009. Quartz as a natural luminescence dosimeter. Earth-Science Reviews 97(1–4): 184–214, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sawakuchi, AO, DeWitt R and Faleiros FM, 2010. Correlation between thermoluminescence sensitivity and crystallization temperatures of quartz: Potential application in geothermometry. Radiation Measurements 46(1): 51–58, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spooner NA, 1994. On the optical dating signal from quartz. Radiation Measurements 23(2–3): 593–600, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90105-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stokes S, 1994. The timing of OSL sensitivity changes in a natural quartz. Radiation Measurements 23(2–3): 601–605, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(94)90106-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoneham D and Stokes S, 1991. An investigation of the relationship between the 110°C TL peak and optically stimulated luminescence in sedimentary quartz. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 18(1–2): 119–123, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(91)90102-N.Google Scholar
  39. Subedi B, Oniya E, Polymeris GS., Afouxenidis D, Tsirliganis NC and Kitis G, 2011. Thermal quenching of thermoluminescence in quartz samples of various origin. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269(6): 572–581, 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomsen KJ, 2004. Optically stimulated luminescence techniques in retrospective dosimetry using single grains of quartz extracted from unheated materials. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. ISSN 0106-2840.Google Scholar
  41. Wintle AG and Murray AS, 2006. A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiation Measurements 41(4): 369–391, 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wintle AG, 1997. Luminescence dating: laboratory procedures and protocols. Radiation Measurements 27(5-6): 769–817, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00220-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wintle AG and Murray AS, 1999. Luminescence sensitivity changes in quartz. Radiation Measurements 30(1): 107–118, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(98)00096-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wintle AG and Murray AS, 2000. Quartz OSL; Effects of thermal treatment and their relevance to laboratory dating procedures. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 387–400, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00057-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang XH and McKeever SWS, 1990. The predose effect in crystalline quartz. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 23(2): 237–244, DOI 10.1088/0022-3727/23/2/017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zimmerman J, 1971. The radiation-induced increase of the 110°C thermoluminescence sensitivity of fired quartz. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 4(18): 3265–3276, DOI 10.1088/0022-3719/4/18/032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ebenezer O. Oniya
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • George S. Polymeris
    • 2
  • Nestor C. Tsirliganis
    • 2
  • George Kitis
    • 3
  1. 1.Physics and Electronics DepartmentAdekunle Ajasin UniversityAkungba AkokoNigeria
  2. 2.Laboratory of Radiation Applications and Archaeological Dating, Department of Archaeometry and Physicochemical Measurements‘Athena’ — Research and Innovation Center in Information, Communication and Knowledge TechnologiesXanthiGreece
  3. 3.Nuclear Physics LaboratoryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations