Modelling concept prototype competencies using a developmental memory model


The use of concepts is fundamental to human-level cognition, but there remain a number of open questions as to the structures supporting this competence. Specifically, it has been shown that humans use concept prototypes, a flexible means of representing concepts such that it can be used both for categorisation and for similarity judgements. In the context of autonomous robotic agents, the processes by which such concept functionality could be acquired would be particularly useful, enabling flexible knowledge representation and application. This paper seeks to explore this issue of autonomous concept acquisition. By applying a set of structural and operational principles, that support a wide range of cognitive competencies, within a developmental framework, the intention is to explicitly embed the development of concepts into a wider framework of cognitive processing. Comparison with a benchmark concept modelling system shows that the proposed approach can account for a number of features, namely concept-based classification, and its extension to prototype-like functionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. [1]

    M. Bar, The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 280–289, (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    P. Baxter, Foundations of a constructivist memory-based approach to cognitive robotics, PhD. Thesis, University of Reading, U.K., (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    P. Baxter, J. de Greeff, R. Wood, T. Belpaeme, “And what is a Seasnake?”: Modelling the Acquisition of Concept Prototypes in a Developmental Framework, 2nd joint International Conference on Developmental Learning (ICDL) & Epigenetic Robotics, San Diego, USA, IEEE Press, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    P. Baxter and W. Browne, Memory as the substrate of cognition: a developmental cognitive robotics perspective, 10th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 19–26, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    P. Baxter, R. Wood, A. Morse, and T. Belpaeme, Memory-Centred Architectures: Perspectives on Human-level Cognitive Competencies, AAAI Fall 2011 Symposium on Cognitive Systems, pp. 26–33, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    H. Branigan, M. Pickering, J. Pearson and J. McLean, Linguistic alignment between people and computers, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 42, no. 9, pp 2355–2368, (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    A. Burton, Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model, Visual Cognition, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 313–348, (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    A. Chella, S. Gaglio, and R. Pirrone, Conceptual representations of actions for autonomous robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 251–263, doi:10.1016/S0921890(00)00121-4, (2001)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    A. Frank and A. Asuncion, UCI Machine Learning Repository, (accessed 15/12/2012), Irvine, CA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    P. Gärdenfors, Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    P. Gärdenfors, and M. Warglien, Using Conceptual Spaces to Model Actions and Events, Journal of Semantics, doi:10.1093/jos/ffs007, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    J. de Greeff, F. Delaunay, and T. Belpaeme, Human-Robot Interaction in Concept Acquisition: a computational model, International Conference on Development and Learning, pp. 1–6, (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    J. de Greeff, F. Delaunay, and T. Belpaeme, Active robot learning with human tutelage, 2nd joint International Conference on Developmental Learning (ICDL) & Epigenetic Robotics, San Diego, USA, IEEE Press, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    M. Kiefer, and F. Pulvermuller, Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions, Cortex, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006, (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    R. Leech, D. Mareschal, and R. Cooper, Analogy as relational priming: a developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 357–378; discussion 378–414, (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    E. Margolis and S. Laurence, Concepts: Core Readings, MIT Press, (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    J. McClelland and D. Rumelhart, An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part 1, an account of basic findings, Psychological Review, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 375–407, (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    C. McNorgan, J. Reid, and K. McRae, Integrating conceptual knowledge within and across representational modalities, Cognition, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.017, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    A. Morse, J. De Greeff, T. Belpaeme, and A. Cangelosi, Epigenetic Robotics Architecture (ERA), IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 325–339, (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    G. Murphy, The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    R. Nosofsky, Attention, similarity, and the identification/categorization relationship, Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 39–57, (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    M. Pickering, and S. Garrod, Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue, The Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 27, no. 2, pp 169–190, (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    R. Pfeifer, M. Lungarella, and F. Iida, Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics, Science, vol. 318, no. 5853, pp 1088–1093, (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    E. Rosch, Natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 328–350, (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    R. Shepard, Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science, Science, vol. 237, no. 4820, pp. 1317–1323, (1987)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    F. Shic, and B. Scassellati, Pitfalls in the Modeling of Developmental Systems, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 435–454, doi:10.1142/S0219843607001084, (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    E. Smith and D. Medin, Categories and Concepts, vol. 4, Harvard University Press, (1981)

  28. [28]

    L. Steels, The Talking Heads Experiment. Volume 1: Words and Meanings, Laboratorium, Antwerpen, (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    R. Sun, Desiderata for cognitive architectures, Philosophical Psychology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp 341–373, (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    A. Thomaz, Socially Guided Machine Learning, PhD thesis, MIT, (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    J. Weng, J. McClelland, A. Pentland, O. Sporns, I. Stockman, M. Sur, and E. Thelen, Autonomous mental development by robots and animals, Science, vol. 291, pp. 599–600, (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32]

    R. Wood, P. Baxter, and T. Belpaeme, A review of long-term memory in natural and synthetic systems, Adaptive Behavior, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–103, (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Baxter.

About this article

Cite this article

Baxter, P., de Greeff, J., Wood, R. et al. Modelling concept prototype competencies using a developmental memory model. Paladyn 3, 200–208 (2012).

Download citation


  • Cognitive Architecture
  • Concept Development
  • Conceptual Spaces
  • DAIM
  • Distributed Associative Memory