Paladyn

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 200–208 | Cite as

Modelling concept prototype competencies using a developmental memory model

  • Paul Baxter
  • Joachim de Greeff
  • Rachel Wood
  • Tony Belpaeme
Research Article

Abstract

The use of concepts is fundamental to human-level cognition, but there remain a number of open questions as to the structures supporting this competence. Specifically, it has been shown that humans use concept prototypes, a flexible means of representing concepts such that it can be used both for categorisation and for similarity judgements. In the context of autonomous robotic agents, the processes by which such concept functionality could be acquired would be particularly useful, enabling flexible knowledge representation and application. This paper seeks to explore this issue of autonomous concept acquisition. By applying a set of structural and operational principles, that support a wide range of cognitive competencies, within a developmental framework, the intention is to explicitly embed the development of concepts into a wider framework of cognitive processing. Comparison with a benchmark concept modelling system shows that the proposed approach can account for a number of features, namely concept-based classification, and its extension to prototype-like functionality.

Keywords

Cognitive Architecture Concept Development Conceptual Spaces DAIM Distributed Associative Memory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Bar, The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 280–289, (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Baxter, Foundations of a constructivist memory-based approach to cognitive robotics, PhD. Thesis, University of Reading, U.K., (2010)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Baxter, J. de Greeff, R. Wood, T. Belpaeme, “And what is a Seasnake?”: Modelling the Acquisition of Concept Prototypes in a Developmental Framework, 2nd joint International Conference on Developmental Learning (ICDL) & Epigenetic Robotics, San Diego, USA, IEEE Press, (2012)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Baxter and W. Browne, Memory as the substrate of cognition: a developmental cognitive robotics perspective, 10th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 19–26, (2010)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Baxter, R. Wood, A. Morse, and T. Belpaeme, Memory-Centred Architectures: Perspectives on Human-level Cognitive Competencies, AAAI Fall 2011 Symposium on Cognitive Systems, pp. 26–33, (2011)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Branigan, M. Pickering, J. Pearson and J. McLean, Linguistic alignment between people and computers, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 42, no. 9, pp 2355–2368, (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Burton, Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model, Visual Cognition, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 313–348, (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Chella, S. Gaglio, and R. Pirrone, Conceptual representations of actions for autonomous robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 251–263, doi:10.1016/S0921890(00)00121-4, (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Frank and A. Asuncion, UCI Machine Learning Repository, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml (accessed 15/12/2012), Irvine, CA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, (2010)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Gärdenfors, Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (2000)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Gärdenfors, and M. Warglien, Using Conceptual Spaces to Model Actions and Events, Journal of Semantics, doi:10.1093/jos/ffs007, (2012)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. de Greeff, F. Delaunay, and T. Belpaeme, Human-Robot Interaction in Concept Acquisition: a computational model, International Conference on Development and Learning, pp. 1–6, (2009)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. de Greeff, F. Delaunay, and T. Belpaeme, Active robot learning with human tutelage, 2nd joint International Conference on Developmental Learning (ICDL) & Epigenetic Robotics, San Diego, USA, IEEE Press, (2012)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Kiefer, and F. Pulvermuller, Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions, Cortex, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006, (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Leech, D. Mareschal, and R. Cooper, Analogy as relational priming: a developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 357–378; discussion 378–414, (2008)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    E. Margolis and S. Laurence, Concepts: Core Readings, MIT Press, (1999)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. McClelland and D. Rumelhart, An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: Part 1, an account of basic findings, Psychological Review, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 375–407, (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. McNorgan, J. Reid, and K. McRae, Integrating conceptual knowledge within and across representational modalities, Cognition, doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.017, (2010)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. Morse, J. De Greeff, T. Belpaeme, and A. Cangelosi, Epigenetic Robotics Architecture (ERA), IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 325–339, (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Murphy, The Big Book of Concepts, MIT Press, (2002)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Nosofsky, Attention, similarity, and the identification/categorization relationship, Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 39–57, (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Pickering, and S. Garrod, Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue, The Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 27, no. 2, pp 169–190, (2004)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. Pfeifer, M. Lungarella, and F. Iida, Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics, Science, vol. 318, no. 5853, pp 1088–1093, (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    E. Rosch, Natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 328–350, (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. Shepard, Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science, Science, vol. 237, no. 4820, pp. 1317–1323, (1987)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. Shic, and B. Scassellati, Pitfalls in the Modeling of Developmental Systems, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 435–454, doi:10.1142/S0219843607001084, (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    E. Smith and D. Medin, Categories and Concepts, vol. 4, Harvard University Press, (1981)Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    L. Steels, The Talking Heads Experiment. Volume 1: Words and Meanings, Laboratorium, Antwerpen, (1999)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    R. Sun, Desiderata for cognitive architectures, Philosophical Psychology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp 341–373, (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Thomaz, Socially Guided Machine Learning, PhD thesis, MIT, (2006)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. Weng, J. McClelland, A. Pentland, O. Sporns, I. Stockman, M. Sur, and E. Thelen, Autonomous mental development by robots and animals, Science, vol. 291, pp. 599–600, (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    R. Wood, P. Baxter, and T. Belpaeme, A review of long-term memory in natural and synthetic systems, Adaptive Behavior, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–103, (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Baxter
    • 1
  • Joachim de Greeff
    • 1
  • Rachel Wood
    • 2
  • Tony Belpaeme
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, Cognition InstitutePlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK
  2. 2.Intelligent Computer Systems, Faculty of Information & Communication TechnologyUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations