, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 371–377 | Cite as

Effect of vegetation cover on the abundance and diversity of ladybirds (Coccinellidae) assemblages in a peat bog

  • Gennadi G. SushkoEmail author
Original Article


Predaceous ladybirds are important natural enemies of many insect pests in terrestrial ecosystems such as peatlands, which are habitats for specialized cold-adapted plants. Ladybird assemblages of pristine peat bogs have not yet been assessed. In total, 15 ladybird species were recorded in peat bog in Belarus by using entomological sweep net. The present study shows low diversity, evenness and species richness of ladybird assemblages. However, a small number of species were present in high numbers. These are Coccinella hieroglyphica, Chilocorus bipustulatus, Coccinulla qutuordecimpustulata and Hippodamia tredecimpunctata. Ladybird abundance was positively related to shrub cover and number of vascular plant species, and negatively related to herb cover. In terms of ladybird diversity, only shrub cover had a significant negative effect.


Ladybirds Species assemblages Diversity Peat bog Belarus 



I am grateful to Danny Haelewaters (Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA) for linguistic assistance and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. Beetles and beetle recording in Great Britain. Accessed 21 May 2017
  2. Bragg O, Lindsay R, Risager M, Silvius M, Zingstra H (2003) Strategy and action plan for mire and peatland conservation in Central Europe. Wageningen, Wetlands InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown D (1954) Methods of surveying and measuring vegetation. Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops, Hurley, Berkshire, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  4. Buga SV, Borodin OI (1999) Assemblages of Homoptera insects of raised bogs of northern Belarus. In: Dolgin M (ed) Biodiversity of terrestrial and soil invertebrates in the north. Syktyvkar, pp 34–35Google Scholar
  5. Buga SV, Shalapenok ES (1991) Overview of coccinellids fauna (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) of Belarus. In: Lopatin IK, Khotko EI (eds) Fauna and ecology of Coleoptera. Belarus, Minsk, pp 111–121Google Scholar
  6. Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC, Chiu CH (2015) Online program Spade R (species-richness prediction and diversity estimation in R). Program and User's Guide published at Accessed 5 October 2017
  7. Coleoptera Poloniae. Accessed 10 October 2017
  8. Drea JJ, Gordon RD (1990) Predators. Coccinellidae. In: Rosen D (ed) The armored scale insects, their biology, natural enemies, and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 19–40Google Scholar
  9. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO). Accessed 9 December 2017
  10. Hammer Ø, Harper DАТ, Ryan RD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electrón 4(1):1–9Google Scholar
  11. Hippa H, Koponen S, Roine R (1982) Feeding preference of Coccinella heiroglyphica (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for eggs of three chrysomelid beetles. Reports from the Kevo Subarctic Research Station 18:1–4Google Scholar
  12. Hodek I, Honěk A (2009) Scale insects, mealybugs, whiteflies and psyllids (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha) as prey of ladybirds. Biol Control 51:232–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozulin AV, Vergeithik SV et al (2005) Treasures of Belarusian nature. In: Areas of international significance for conservation of biological diversity. Minsk, Birdlife BelarusGoogle Scholar
  15. Maavara V (1957) Endla rabade entomofauna. Eestj NVS Teeaduste Akadeemia Juures asuva loodusuurijate seeltsi 50:119–140Google Scholar
  16. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Peus F (1928) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Tierwelt Nordwestdeutscher Hochmoore. Eine ökologische Studie. Insekten, Spinnentiere, Wirbeltiere. Z Morphol Okol Tiere 12:533–683. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  19. Roy HE, Brown PMJ, Adriaens T et al (2016) The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: global perspectives on invasion history and ecology. Biol Invasions 18(4):997–1044. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spungis V (2008) Fauna and ecology of terrestrial invertebrates in raised bog in Latvia. Latvias Entomology Bedriba, RigaGoogle Scholar
  21. Sushko GG (2017a) Diversity and species composition of beetles in the herb-shrub layer of a large isolated raised bog in Belarus. Mires Peat 19(10):1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sushko GG (2017b) Taxonomic composition and species diversity of insect assemblages in grass–shrub cover of peat bogs in Belarus. Contemp Probl Ecol 10(3):259–270. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zuur AF, Ieno IN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of biology, Department of Ecology and Environmental ProtectionVitebsk State University P. M. MasherovVitebskBelarus

Personalised recommendations