, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 129–135 | Cite as

Oxidative stress response to aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles in Triticum aestivum

  • Fatma Yanık
  • Filiz VardarEmail author
Original Article


The development of nanotechnologies has increased the amount of manufactured metal oxide nanoparticles in the environment. In the view of nanoparticle dispersion to the environment, assessment of their toxicity becomes very crucial. Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles have wide range of use in industry as well as personal care products. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dose dependent effects of 13-nm-sized Al2O3 nanoparticles on wheat correlating with the appearance of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense response. Wheat roots were exposed to different concentrations of Al2O3 nanoparticles (5, 25 and 50 mg mL−1) for 96 h. The effects of Al2O3 nanoparticles were studied using different parameters such as H2O2 content, superoxide dismutase and catalase activity, lipid peroxidation, total proline, photosynthetic pigment and anthocyanin content. The results indicated that while Al2O3 nanoparticles caused a dose dependent increase in H2O2 content, superoxide dismutase activity, lipid peroxidation and proline contents, the catalase activity was decreased in compare the control. Moreover, total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, carotenoids and anthocyanin contents reduced in the highest concentration 50 mg mL−1. In conclusion, Al2O3 nanoparticles caused oxidative stress in wheat after 96 h.


Triticum aestivum Aluminum oxide nanoparticles Enzymatic antioxidants Non-enzymatic antioxidants Oxidative stress Photosynthetic pigments 



This study is supported by Research Foundation of Marmara University (BAPKO) project number FEN-A-110915-0431.


  1. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates LS (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burklew CE, Ashlock J, Winfrey WB, Zhang B (2012) Effects of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on the growth, development, and microRNA expression of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). PLoS One 7(5):e34783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cakmak I, Horst JH (1991) Effects of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiol Plant 83:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cakmak I, Marschner H (1992) Magnesium deficiency and high light ıntensity enhance activities of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase in bean leaves. Plant Physiol 98:1222–1227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C, Dickman MB (2005) Proline suppresses apoptosis in the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum trifolii. PNAS 102:3459–3464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Z, Silva H, Klessig DF (1993) Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid. Science 262:1883–1886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho YW, Park EH, Lim CJ (2000) Glutathione S-transferase activities of S-type and L-type thiol transferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biochem Mol Biol 33:179–183Google Scholar
  9. Cornelis G, Kerstin HR, Kuhlbusch T, Brink NVD, Nickel C (2014) Fate and bioavailability of engineered nanoparticles in soils: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2720–2764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dat JF, Foyer CH, Scott IM (1998) Changes in salicylic acid and antioxidants during induced thermotolerance in mustard seedlings. Plant Physiol 118:1455–1461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Foyer CH, Noctor G (2005) Redox homeostis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 17:1866–1875CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stres tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanemann T, Szabó DV (2010) Polymer-nanoparticle composites: from synthesis to modern applications. Materials 3:3468–3517CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Junglee S, Urban L, Sallanon H, Lopez-Lauri F (2014) Optimized assay for hydrogen peroxide determination in plant tissue using potassium iodide. Am J Anal Chem 5:730–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller AA, Wang H, Zhou D, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji Z (2010) Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962–1967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma C, Chhikara S, Xing B, Musante C, White JC, Dhankher OP (2013) Physiological and molecular response of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) to nanoparticle cerium and indium oxide exposure. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:768–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma C, White JC, Dhankher OP, Xing B (2015) Metal-based nanotoxicity and detoxification pathways in higher plants. Environ Sci Technol 49:7109–7122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehdy MC (1994) Active oxygen species in plant defense against pathogens. Plant Physiol 105:467–472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Miralles P, Church TL, Harris AT (2012) Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ Sci Technol 46:9224–9239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mishra NP, Mishra NK, Singhal GS (1995) Changes in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visual light at different temperatures in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Plant Physiol 102:903–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Montillet JL, Chamnongpol S, Rustérucci C, Dat J, van de Cotte B, Agnel JP, Battesti C, Inzé D, Van Breusegem F, Triantaphylides C (2005) Fatty acid hydroperoxides and H2O2 in the execution of hypersensitive cell death in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiol 138:1516–1526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Nair PMG, Chung IM (2014a) Impact of copper oxide nanoparticles exposure on Arabidopsis thaliana growth, root system development, root lignificaion, and molecular level changes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12709–12722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nair PMG, Chung IM (2014b) Physiological and molecular level effects of silver nanoparticles exposure in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere 112:105–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nair PMG, Kim SH, Chung IM (2014) Copper oxide nanoparticle toxicity in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) seedlings: physiological and molecular level responses of in vitro grown plants. Acta Physiol Plant 36:2947–2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao AJ (2008) Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicology 17:372–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nel A, Xia T, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nano levels. Science 311:622–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Quan LJ, Zhang B, Shi WW, Li HY (2008) Hydrogen peroxide in plants: a versatile molecule of the reactive oxygen species network. J Integr Plant Biol 50:2–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabino I, Mancinelli AL (1986) Light, temperature and anthocyanin production. Plant Physiol 81:922–924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Riahi-Madvar A, Rezaee F, Jalali V (2012) Effects of alumina nanoparticles on morphological properties and antioxidant system of Triticum aestivum. Iran J Plant Physiol 3:595–603Google Scholar
  31. Rico CM, Morales MI, McCreary R (2013) Cerium oxide nanoparticles modify the antioxidative stress enzyme activities and macromolecule composition in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 47:14110–14118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shim IS, Momose Y, Yamamoto A, Kim DW, Usui K (2003) Inhibition of catalase activity by oxidative stress and its relationship to salicylic acid accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul 39:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shirazi AM, Shariati F, Keshavarz AK, Ramezanpour Z (2015) Toxic effect of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on green micro–algae Dunaliella salina. Int J Environ Res 9:585–594Google Scholar
  34. Wu SB, Wu YT, Wu TP, Wei YH (2014) Role of AMPK–mediated adaptive responses in human cells with mitochondrial dysfunction to oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:1331–1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yanık F, Vardar F (2015) Toxic effects of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles on root growth and development in Triticum aestivum. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Arts Faculty, Department of BiologyMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations