Chemical Papers

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 249–253 | Cite as

Content of selected secondary metabolites in wild hop

  • Eva ÜrgeováEmail author
  • Katarína Vulganová
  • Ľudovít Polívka
Original Paper


We focused on the determination of biologically active secondary metabolites in wild hops over the course of the vegetation period in four selected sites in Piešťany. Hop was collected in four collection periods in 2010. The objects of research were the leaves of male and female plants, and female cones. Analysis of the extracts from wild hop confirmed differences in total content of polyphenols, flavonoids between the localities and in the growing seasons over the vegetation period. The extracts from leaves from the first harvest in localities “gSládkovičova” and the river Vah showed higher levels of polyphenols (4.91–6.93 mg g−1 of dry mass), flavonoids (2.28–2.99 mg g−1 of dry mass) than the extracts from cones collected at the end of the vegetation period (polyphenols 3.63–5.33 mg g−1 of dry mass, flavonoids 1.86–2.16 mg g−1 of dry mass). The extracts from leaves from the first harvest from the “tennis court” site showed lower values of polyphenols and flavonoids. Our findings were that the leaves from the first harvest at the beginning of the growing season contained higher amounts of the secondary metabolites investigated than the cones at the end of the growing season. The content of α-bitter acids in wild hop cones ranged from 1.64 % to 2.91 %, in leaves from 0.11 % to 0.99%. Concentration of β-bitter acids in cones varied from 1.63 % to 1.93 % and in leaves from 0.02 % to 0.61 %.


wild hop polyphenols flavonoids bitter acids 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barros, L., Dueñas, M., Dias, M. I., Sousa, M. J., Santos-Buelga, C., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2012). Phenolic profiles of in vivo and in vitro grown Coriandrum sativum L. Food Chemistry, 132, 841–848. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collin, H. A. (2001). Secondary product formation in plant tissue cultures. Plant Growth Regulation, 34, 119–134. DOI: 10.1023/a:1013374417961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Čeh, B., Kač, M., Košir, I. J., & Abram, V. (2007). Relationships between xanthohumol and polyphenol content in hop leaves and hop cones with regard to water supply and cultivar. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 8, 989–1000. DOI: 10.3390/i8090989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Keukeleire, J., Ooms, G., Heyerick, A., Roldan-Ruiz, I., Van Bockstaele, E., & De Keukeleire, D. (2003). Formation and accumulation of α-acids, β-acids, desmethylxanthohumol, and xanthohumol during flowering of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 4436–4441. DOI: 10.1021/jf034263z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delmulle, L., Bellahcène, A., Dhooge, W., Comhaire, F., Roelens, F., Huvaere, K., Heyerick, A., Castronovo, V., & De Keukeleire, D. (2006). Anti-proliferative properties of prenylated flavonoids from hops (Humulus lupulus L.) in human prostate cancer cell lines. Phytomedicine, 13, 732–734. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hampton, R., Nickerson, G., Whitney, P., & Haunold, A. (2002). Erratum to “Comparative chemical attributes of native North American hop, Humulus lupulus var. lupuloides E. Small”. Phytochemistry, 63, 737–738. DOI: 10.1016/s0031- 9422(03)00248-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofta, P., Dostálek P., & Basarová, G. (2004). Xantohumol — chmelová pryskyrice nebo polyfenol? Chemické Listy, 98, 825–830.Google Scholar
  8. Jelínek, L., Šneberger, M., Karabín, M., & Dostálek, P. (2010). Comparison of Czech hop cultivars based on their contents of secondary metabolites. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 28, 309–316.Google Scholar
  9. Krofta, K. (2006). Spektrofotometrické stanovení alfa a beta hořkých kyselin (ASBC). Žatec, Czech Republic: Hop Research Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Naczk, M., & Shahidi, F. (2004). Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food. Journal of Chromatography A, 1054, 95–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.059.Google Scholar
  11. Patzak, J., Nesvadba, V., Henychová, A., & Krofta, K. (2010). Assessment of the genetic diversity of wild hops (Humulus lupulus L.) in Europe using chemical and molecular analyses. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 38, 136–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2009.12.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piendl, A., & Biendl, M. (2000). Physiological significance of polyphenols and hop bitters in beer. Brauwelt International, 18, 310–317.Google Scholar
  13. Rakotoarison, D. A., Gressier, B., Trotin, F., Brunet, C., Dine, T., Luyckx, M., Vasseur, J., Cazin, M., Cazin, J. C., & Pinkas, M. (1997). Antioxidant activities of polyphenolic extracts from flowers, in vitro callus and cell suspension cultures of Crataegus monogyna. Pharmazie, 52, 60–63.Google Scholar
  14. SHMÚ (2010). Written information on request about climatological conditions from the climatological station Piešťany. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SHMÚ).Google Scholar
  15. Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144–158.Google Scholar
  16. Ürgeová, E., & Polívka, L. (2009). Secondary metabolites with antibacterial effects from leaves of different hop cultivars during vegetal periods. Nova Biotechnologica, 9, 327–332.Google Scholar
  17. Vašková, M. (2009). Stanovenie vybraných sekundárnych metabolitov s biocídnym úcinkom v rôznych odrodách chmelu obycajného pocas vegetácie. Rigorous thesis. University of SS. Cyril and Methodius, Trnava, Slovakia.Google Scholar
  18. Zanoli, P., & Zavatti, M. (2008). Pharmacognostic and pharmacological profile of Humulus lupulus L. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 116, 383–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Ürgeová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katarína Vulganová
    • 1
  • Ľudovít Polívka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of SS. Cyril and MethodiusTrnavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations