Abstract
This study is directed towards investigating the role of the surface treatment of clay particles on the rheological and thermomechanical behaviour of clay-epoxy blends. Nanocomposites were prepared by mixing small amounts (5–10 mass %) of commercial organoclays or raw clays with an epoxy system commonly used in civil engineering. Rheological characterisations in the liquid state revealed a pronounced thixotropic character of the organoclay-based systems, which all exhibited a shear-thinning behaviour above a critical stress threshold (yield stress), depending on both the intensity of interfacial interactions and the degree of filler dispersion. On the other hand, systems based on raw clay particles behaved like Newtonian fluids, in the same way as the unreinforced polymer matrix. Complementary dynamic mechanical analyses (DMA) performed on the cured cross-linked nanocomposites also showed significant changes in the viscoelastic behaviour of the epoxy matrix due to the introduction of organoclays, whereas only minor variations were observed following the introduction of raw fillers. These results were consistent with nanoscale morphological characterisations performed by conventional X-ray diffraction (XRD) on the various hybrid systems. In this context, rheology and DMA appear as attractive alternative methods for assessing the filler dispersion at a macroscopic (and possibly more relevant) scale. This research is of practical interest for civil engineers, since clay reinforced-epoxies could in the future be used as coating materials with enhanced barrier performances, in order to protect infrastructures against environmental ageing or corrosion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, A., & Kodur, V. K. R. (2011). Effect of bond degradation on fire resistance of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, 226–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.004.
Almusallam, A. A., Khan, F. M., Dulaijan, S. U., & Al-Amoudi, O. S. B. (2003). Effectiveness of surface coatings in improving concrete durability. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25, 473–481. DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00087-2.
Almusallam, A., Khan, F. M., & Maslehuddin, M. (2002). Performance of concrete coating under varying exposure conditions. Materials and Structures, 35, 487–494. DOI: 10.1007/bf02483136.
Benzarti, K., Chataigner, S., Quiertant, M., Marty, C., & Aubagnac, C. (2011). Accelerated ageing behaviour of the adhesive bond between concrete specimens and CFRP overlays. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 523–538. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.003.
Brown, J., Rhoney, I., & Pethrick, R. A. (2004). Epoxy resin based nanocomposites: 1. Diglycidylether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) with triethylenetetramine (TETA). Polymer International, 53, 2130–2137. DOI: 10.1002/pi.1638.
Corcione, C. E., Frigione, M., & Acierno, D. (2009). Rheological characterization of UV-curable epoxy systems: Effects of o-Boehmite nanofillers and a hyperbranched polymeric modifier. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 112, 1302–1310. DOI: 10.1002/app.29603.
Corcione, C. E., Cavallo, A., Pesce, E., Greco, A., & Maffezzoli, A. (2011). Evaluation of the degree of dispersion of nanofillers by mechanical, rheological, and permeability analysis. Polymer Engineering & Science, 51, 1280–1285. DOI: 10.1002/pen.21929.
Coussot, P., Nguyen, Q. D., Huynh, H. T., & Bonn, D. (2002). Avalanche behavior in yield stress fluids. Physical Review Letters, 88, 175551. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.175501.
Djouani, F., Herbst, F., Chehimi, M. M., & Benzarti, K. (2010). Preparation of exfoliated clay/polymer nanocomposites via organosilane grafting and in situ ATRP of glycidyl methacrylate. Surface and Interface Analysis, 42, 1019–1024. DOI: 10.1002/sia.3259.
Djouani, F., Herbst, F., Chehimi, M. M., & Benzarti, K. (2011). Synthesis, characterization and reinforcing properties of novel, reactive clay/poly(glycidyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 424–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.003.
Durmus, A., Kasgoz, A., & Macosko, C. W. (2007). Linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)/clay nanocomposites. Part I: Structural characterization and quantifying clay dispersion by melt rheology. Polymer, 48, 4492–4502. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.074.
Ferroir, T., Huynh, H. T., Château, X., & Coussot, P. (2004). Motion of solid object through a pasty (thixotropic) fluid. Physics of Fluids, 16, 594–601. DOI: 10.1063/1.1640372.
Gamage, J. C. P. H., Al-Mahaidi, R., & Wong, M. B. (2006). Bond characteristics of CFRP plated concrete members under elevated temperatures. Composite Structures, 75, 199–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.068.
Hackman, I., & Hollaway, L. (2006). Epoxy-layered silicate nanocomposites in civil engineering. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37, 1161–1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.027.
Hrachová, J, Chodák, I., & Komadel, P. (2009). Modification and characterization of montmorillonite fillers used in composites with vulcanized natural rubber. Chemical Papers, 63, 55–61. DOI: 10.2478/s11696-008-0079-y.
Huynh, H. T., Roussel, N., & Coussot, P. (2005). Aging and free surface flow of a thixotropic fluid. Physics of Fluids, 17, 033101. DOI: 10.1063/1.1844911.
Ingram, S., Dennis, H., Hunter, I., Liggat, J. J., McAdam, C., Pethrick, R. A, Schaschke, C., & Thomson, D. (2008). Influence of clay type on exfoliation, cure and physical properties of in situ polymerised poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. Polymer International, 57, 1118–1127. DOI: 10.1002/pi.2453.
Issa, C. A., & Debs, P. (2007). Experimental study of epoxy repairing of cracks in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 157–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.030.
Jeon, H. S., Rameshwaram, J. K., Kim, G., & Weinkauf, D. H. (2003). Characterization of polyisoprene-clay nanocomposites prepared by solution blending. Polymer, 44, 5749–5758. DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00466-x.
Kaynak, C., Nakas, G. I., & Isitman, N. A. (2009). Mechanical properties, flammability and char morphology of epoxy resin/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Applied Clay Science, 46, 319–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.033.
Le Pluart, L., Duchet, J., Sautereau, H., Halley, P., & Gerard, J. F. (2004). Rheological properties of organoclays suspensions in epoxy network precursors. Applied Clay Science, 25, 207–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2003.11.004.
Legghe, E., Aragon, E., Bélec, L., Margaillan, A., & Melot, D. (2009). Correlation between water diffusion and adhesion loss: Study of an epoxy primer on steel. Progress in Organic Coatings, 66, 276–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.08.001.
Lertwimolnun, W., & Vergnes, B. (2004). Influence de la dispersion sur le comportement rhéologique de nanocomposites polypropylčne/argile. Rhéologie, 5, 27–35.
Mays, G. C., & Hutchinson, A. R. (1992). Adhesives in civil engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511529597.
Mays, G. C. (2001). Performance requirements for structural adhesives in relation to concrete strengthening. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 21, 423–429. DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(01)00019-7.
Pavlidou, S., & Papaspyrides, C. D. (2008). A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Progress in Polymer Science, 33, 1119–1198. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008.
Ren, J. X., Silva, A. S., & Krishnamoorti, R. (2000). Linear viscoelasticity of disordered polystyrene-polyisoprene block copolymer based layered-silicate nanocomposites. Macromolecules, 33, 3739–3746. DOI: 10.1021/ma992091u.
Rodrigues, M. P. M. C., Costa, M., Mendes, A. M., & Eusébio Marques, M. I. (2000). Effectiveness of surface coatings to protect reinforced concrete in marine environments. Materials & Structures, 33, 618–626. DOI: 10.1007/bf02480601.
Selvaraj, R., Selvaraj, M., & Iyer, S. V. K. (2009). Studies on the evaluation of the performance of organic coatings used for the prevention of corrosion of steel rebars in concrete structures. Progress in Organic Coatings, 64, 454–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.005.
Shi, X. M., Nguyen, T. A., Suo, Z. Y., Liu, Y. J., & Avci, R. (2009). Effect of nanoparticles on the anticorrosion and mechanical properties of epoxy coating. Surface & Coatings Technology, 204, 237–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.06.048.
Wagener, R., & Reisinger, T. J. G. (2003). A rheological method to compare the degree of exfoliation of nanocomposites. Polymer, 44, 7513–7518. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.01.001.
Woo, R. S. C., Zhu, H. G., Chow, M. M. K, Leung, C. K. Y., & Kim, J. K. (2008). Barrier performance of silane-clay nanocomposite coatings on concrete structure. Composites Science and Technology, 68, 2828–2836. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.028.
Xia, H. S., & Song, M. (2006). Preparation and characterisation of polyurethane grafted single-walled carbon nanotubes and derived polyurethane nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 16, 1843–1851. DOI: 10.1039/b601152g.
Xidas, P. I., & Triantafyllidis, K. S. (2010). Effect of the type of alkylammonium ion clay modifier on the structure and thermal/mechanical properties of glassy and rubbery epoxyclay nanocomposites. European Polymer Journal, 46, 404–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.11.004.
Yasmin, A., Abot, J. L., & Daniel, I. M. (2003). Processing of clay/epoxy nanocomposites by shear mixing. Scripta Materialia, 49, 81–86. DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00173-8.
Zhao, J., Morgan, A. B., & Harris, J. D. (2005). Rheological characterization of polystyrene-clay nanocomposites to compare the degree of exfoliation and dispersion. Polymer, 46, 8641–8660. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.038.
Zhu, L. X., Papadopoulos, K., & De Kee, D. (2002). Yield stress measurement of silicon nitride suspensions. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 80, 1175–1180. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450800619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huynh, HT., Benzarti, K. & Duc, M. Role of interfacial chemistry on the rheology and thermo-mechanical properties of clay-polymer nanocomposites for building applications. Chem. Pap. 66, 519–531 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-011-0118-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-011-0118-y