Skip to main content
Log in

Granulation of activated sludge in a laboratory upflow sludge blanket reactor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Chemical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The creation of anoxic granulated biomass has been monitored in a laboratory USB (Upflow Sludge Blanket) reactor with the volume of 3.6 L. The objective of this research was to verify the possibilities of post-denitrification of residual NO3-N concentrations in treated wastewater (denitrification of 10-20 mg L−1 NO3-N) and to determine the maximum hydraulic and mass loading of the granulated biomass reactor. G-phase from biodiesel production and methanol were both tested as external organic denitrification substrates. The ratio of the organic substrate COD to NO3-N was 6. Only methanol was proven as a suitable organic substrate for this kind of reactor. However, the biomass adaptation to the substrate took over a week. The cultivation of anoxic granulated biomass was reached at hydraulic loading of over 0.35 m h−1. The size of granules was smaller when compared with results found and described in literary reports (granules up to 1 mm); however, settling properties were excellent and denitrification was deemed suitable for the USB reactor. Sludge volume indexes of granules ranged from 35-50 mL g−1 and settling rates reached 11 m h−1. Maximum hydraulic and mass loadings in the USB reactor were 0.95 m3 m−2 h−1 and 6.6 kg m−3 d−1. At higher loading levels, a wash-out of the biomass occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhatti, Z. I., Sumida, K., Rouse, J. D., & Furukawa, K. (2001). Characterization of denitrifying granular sludge treating soft groundwater in USB reactor. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 91, 373–377. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80154-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borzacconi, L., Ottonello, G., Castelló, E., Pelaez, H., & Gazzola, A. (2000). Denitrification in carbon and nitrogen removal system for leachate treatment. Water Science and Technology, 40, 145–151. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00620-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-López, F.M., Martinez, F., Gutiérrez Rojas, M., Noyola, R. A., & Gómez, J. (1999). Effect of nitrogen loading rates and carbon sources on denitrification and sludge settleability in UASB reactor. Water Science and Technology, 40, 123–130. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00617-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiroa, M., Kennes, C., & Veigga, M. C. (2004). Formaldehyde and urea removal in denitrifying granular sludge blanket reactor. Water Research, 38, 3495–3502. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, A., Roca, E., & Lema, J. M. (2006). Granulation in high-load denitrifying USB pulsed reactor. Water Research, 40, 871–880. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., Tarre, S., Shnizer, M., Bogdan, B., Armon, R., & Shelet, R. (1994). Groundwater denitrification using an upflow sludge blanket reactor. Water Research, 28, 631–636. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90013-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenicek, P., Zabranska, J., & Dohanyos, M. (2002). Adaptation of methanogenic granules to denitrification in anaerobic-anoxic USB reactor. Water Science and Technology, 45, 335–340.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Derco, J., & Bilanin, M. (1996a). Comparison of ethanol and glucose in denitrification of drinking water in USB reactor. Vodohospodársky spravodajca, 39, 15–17. (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Hutňan, M., Derco, J., & Fargašová, A. (1996b). Denitrification of drinking water in USB reactor. Vodohospodársky spravodajca, 39, 9–13. (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvíl, K., Drtil, M., Hutňan, M., Derco, J., & Fargašová, A. (1997). Characteristic of granulated denitrification biomass. Vodní hospodářství, 47, 23–26. (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettinga, G., & Hulshoff Pol, L. (1986). Advanced reactor design, operation and economy. Water Science and Technology, 18, 99–108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lettinga, G., van Velsen, A. F. M., Hobma, S.W., de Zeeuw, W., & Klapwijk, A. (1980). Use of the upflow sludge blanket reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 22, 699–734. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260220402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G., Jeison, D., & Chamy, R. (2006). Development of denitrifying and methanogenic activities in USB reactors for treatment of wastewater: Effect of COD/N ratio. Process Biochemistry, 41, 1338–1342. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoek, J. P., & Klapwijk, A. (1987). Nitrate removal from ground water. Water Research, 21, 989–997. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(87)80018-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Pagáčová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagáčová, P., Drtil, M. & Galbová, K. Granulation of activated sludge in a laboratory upflow sludge blanket reactor. Chem. Pap. 63, 125–130 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-008-0092-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-008-0092-1

Keywords

Navigation