Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of 905 nm and 1550 nm semiconductor laser rangefinders’ performance deterioration due to adverse environmental conditions

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Opto-Electronics Review

Abstract

Laser rangefinder performance (i.e., maximum range) is strongly affected by environment due to visibility-dependent laser attenuation in the atmosphere and target reflectivity variations induced by surface condition changes (dry vs. wet). Both factors have their unique spectral features which means that rangefinders operating at different wavelengths are affected by specific environmental changes in a different way. Current state of the art TOF (time of flight) semiconductor laser rangefinders are based mainly on two wavelengths: 905 nm and 1550 nm, which results from atmospheric transmission windows and availability of high power pulsed sources. The paper discusses the scope of maximum range degradation of hypothetical 0.9 μm and 1.5 μm rangefinders due to selected water-related environmental effects. Atmospheric extinction spectra were adapted from Standard Atmosphere Model and reflectance fingerprints of various materials have been measured. It is not the aim of the paper to determine in general which wavelength is superior for laser range finding, since a number of criteria could be considered, but to verify their susceptibility to adverse environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.C. Amann, T. Bosch, M. Lescure, R. Myllyla, and M. Rioux, “Laser ranging: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement”, Opt. Eng. 40, 10–19 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H.N. Burns, C.G. Christodoulou, and G.D. Boreman, “System design of a pulsed laser rangefinder”, Opt. Eng. 30, 323–329 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. C.J. Willers, Electro-Optical System Analysis. A Radiometry Perspective., SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Zygmunt, “Methods of sub-noise signals detection in time-of-flight laser rangefinders”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Military University of Technology, Warsaw, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.D. Richmond and S.C. Cain, Direct-Detection LADAR Systems, SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Weichel, Laser Beam Propagation Through the Atmosphere, SPIE Press, Bellingham, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Yang, Y. Zhao, Z. Yuan, Q. Lijie, L. Shigang, and N. Jingda, “Analysis of the Transmittance of laser atmospheric transmission”, Infrared and Laser Engineering 28, 15–20 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.A. Twomey, C.F. Bohren, and J.L. Mergenthaler, “Reflectance and albedo differences between wet and dry surfaces”, Appl. Opt. 25, 431–437 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K.F. Palmer and D. Williams, “Optical properties of water in the near-infrared”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1107–1110 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Chrzanowski, “Review of night vision technology”, Opt.-Electron. Rev. 21, 153–181 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wojtanowski.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wojtanowski, J., Zygmunt, M., Kaszczuk, M. et al. Comparison of 905 nm and 1550 nm semiconductor laser rangefinders’ performance deterioration due to adverse environmental conditions. Opto-Electron. Rev. 22, 183–190 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-014-0190-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-014-0190-2

Keywords

Navigation