, Volume 74, Issue 12, pp 1699–1709 | Cite as

Novel alternatively spliced isoforms of pig ZNF280D and their diverse mRNA expression patterns

  • Xiaohong Guo
  • Yulong Guo
  • Pengfei Gao
  • Meng Li
  • Yushu Jin
  • Min Liu
  • Wenqian Shi
  • Junwen Han
  • Bugao LiEmail author
  • Guoqing CaoEmail author
Original Article


The ZNF280D is a member of the C2H2 zinc finger family, which plays important roles in cell and organismal growth, secretion, and other biological processes. This study aimed to identify the alternative splicing of pig ZNF280D, and to predict the structure and function of the encoded proteins, as well as to study the spatio-temporal expression patterns of each transcript. RNA-seq and qPCR technology were used to identify the transcripts of pig ZNF280D. We found two transcripts, ZNF280D1 and ZNF280D2 (GenBank accession number: MF279143). ZNF280D1 is the common transcript, whereas ZNF280D2 lacked a large region at exon 8. In addition, ZNF280D2 had an additional C2H2 zinc finger domain, changing the protein from a tC2H2 to a maC2H2 zinc finger protein. The expression of two transcripts in various tissues of pig was differ significant. ZNF280D2 is the main subtype. The expression of ZNF280D2 in pig muscle was found to increase gradually with age. The ZNF280D1 was first decreased and then increased slightly. We successfully identified two transcripts of pig ZNF280D, and we suggested important functions for ZNF280D in digestive absorption and growth as well as in the development of skeletal muscles, the specific mechanisms for which would require further study.


Pig ZNF280D Alternative splicing Bioinformatics Expression characterization 



We thank Editage [] for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. Thanks to all the staff of the Datong pig farm. This work was supported by the Program for Sanjin Scholar (grant numbers 2016, 2017), the Fund for Shanxi 1331 Project (grant number 2017), the Foundation of Science and Technology Innovation Team of Shanxi Province (grant number 201705D131028-19), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31872336) and the Program for the Top Young Academic Leaders of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We confirm that this manuscript has not been published in whole or in part and is not being considered for publication elsewhere. The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11756_2019_304_MOESM1_ESM.doc (44 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 43 kb)
11756_2019_304_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (58 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 57 kb)


  1. Ashmore CR, Addis PB, Doerr L (1973) Development of muscle fibers in the fetal pig. J Anim Sci 36:1088–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckingham M, Vincent SD (2009) Distinct and dynamic myogenic populations in the vertebrate embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19:444–453. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buonincontri R et al (2011) A cohort of balanced reciprocal translocations associated with dyslexia: identification of two putative candidate genes at DYX1. Behav Genet 41:125–133. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Choo Y (1998) End effects in DNA recognition by zinc finger arrays. Nucleic Acids Res 26:554–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clemens KR, Zhang P, Liao X, McBryant SJ, Wright PE, Gottesfeld JM (1994) Relative contributions of the zinc fingers of transcription factor IIIA to the energetics of DNA binding. J Mol Biol 244:23–35. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng H, Qin Z, Zhang X (2013) Opportunities and methods for studying alternative splicing in cancer with RNA-Seq. Cancer Lett 340:179–191. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankel AD, Pabo CO (1988) Fingering too many proteins. Cell 53:675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh S, Chan CK (2016) Analysis of RNA-Seq data using TopHat and cufflinks. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 1374:339–361. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Graveley BR et al (2011) The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471:473–479. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo L, Ci H, Shan H, Zou X, Zhai Y, Li Y (2005) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a novel human gene ZNF18. Hereditas 27:523–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo X, Li M, Gao P, Cao G, Cheng Z, Zhang W, Liu J, Liu X, Li B (2018) Novel splice isoforms of pig myoneurin and their diverse mRNA expression patterns. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31(10):1581-1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong L et al (2017) E-cadherin and ZEB2 modulate trophoblast cell differentiation during placental development in pigs. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 154:765–775. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang XZ, Wei DD, Shen GM, Dou W, Wang JJ (2012) Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of voltage-gated sodium channel gene cDNA in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Sci Agric Sin 45:3996-4003Google Scholar
  14. Kassar-Duchossoy L, Giacone E, Gayraud-Morel B, Jory A, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S (2005) Pax3/Pax7 mark a novel population of primitive myogenic cells during development. Gene Dev 19:1426–1431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL (2013) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14:R36. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947-2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li HD, Menon R, Omenn GS, Guan Y (2014) Revisiting the identification of canonical splice isoforms through integration of functional genomics and proteomics evidence. Proteomics 14:2709–2718. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Liao XB, Clemens KR, Tennant L, Wright PE, Gottesfeld JM (1992) Specific interaction of the first three zinc fingers of TFIIIA with the internal control region of the Xenopus 5 S RNA gene. J Mol Biol 223:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu X et al (2019) Disruption of the ZBED6 binding site in intron 3 of IGF2 by CRISPR/Cas9 leads to enhanced muscle development in Liang Guang Small Spotted pigs. Transgenic Res 28:141–150. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marquez Y, Brown JW, Simpson C, Barta A, Kalyna M (2012) Transcriptome survey reveals increased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Res 22:1184–1195. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller J, McLachlan AD, Klug A (1985) Repetitive zinc-binding domains in the protein transcription factor IIIA from Xenopus oocytes.. The EMBO Journal 4(6):1609-1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Modrek B, Lee C (2002) A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nat Genet 30:13–19. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagase T, Kikuno R, Nakayama M, Hirosawa M, Ohara O (2000) Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. XVIII. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res 7:273–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakagama H, Heinrich G, Pelletier J, Housman DE (1995) Sequence and structural requirements for high-affinity DNA binding by the WT1 gene product. Mol Cell Biol 15:1489–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neely L, Trauger JW, Baird EE, Dervan PB, Gottesfeld JM (1997) Importance of minor groove binding zinc fingers within the transcription factor IIIA-DNA complex. J Mol Biol 274:439–445. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Neely LS, Lee BM, Xu J, Wright PE, Gottesfeld JM (1999) Identification of a minimal domain of 5 S ribosomal RNA sufficient for high affinity interactions with the RNA-specific zinc fingers of transcription factor IIIA. J Mol Biol 291:549–560. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nolte RT, Conlin RM, Harrison SC, Brown RS (1998) Differing roles for zinc fingers in DNA recognition: structure of a six-finger transcription factor IIIA complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:2938–2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nozawa RS et al (2010) Human POGZ modulates dissociation of HP1alpha from mitotic chromosome arms through Aurora B activation. Nat Cell Biol 12:719–727. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Omichinski JG, Pedone PV, Felsenfeld G, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1997) The solution structure of a specific GAGA factor-DNA complex reveals a modular binding mode. Nat Struct Biol 4:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF (2003) Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett 339:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rebar EJ et al (2002) Induction of angiogenesis in a mouse model using engineered transcription factors. Nat Med 8:1427–1432. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ren H et al (2009) Genomic structure, chromosomal localization and expression profile of a porcine long non-coding RNA isolated from long SAGE libraries. Anim Genet 40:499–508. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosnoblet C, Vandamme J, Volkel P, Angrand PO (2011) Analysis of the human HP1 interactome reveals novel binding partners. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 413:206–211. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Searles MA, Lu D, Klug A (2000) The role of the central zinc fingers of transcription factor IIIA in binding to 5 S RNA. J Mol Biol 301:47–60. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Song T et al (2019) Zfp217 mediates m6A mRNA methylation to orchestrate transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation to promote adipogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Toska E, Roberts SG (2014) Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by WT1 (Wilms' tumour 1). Biochem J 461:15–32. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vermeulen M et al (2010) Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell 142:967–980. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wimmers K, Ngu NT, Jennen DGJ, Tesfaye D, Murani E, Schellander K, Ponsuksili S (2008) Relationship between myosin heavy chain isoform expression and muscling in several diverse pig breeds1. Journal of Animal Science 86(4):795-803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiang H, Zhong ZX, Peng YD, Jiang SW (2017) The emerging role of Zfp217 in Adipogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang X, Xiao S (2008) Progress on the method of identification of alternative splicing. Life Science Instruments 6:8–11Google Scholar
  41. Zhao Y, Song Z, Bai J, Liu X, Nauwynck H, Jiang P (2019) ZAP, a CCCH-type zinc finger protein, inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication and interacts with viral Nsp9. J Virol 93.
  42. Zhou C, Li L (2004) Advances in C2H2 zinc finger proteins. Life Science Research 8:216–220Google Scholar
  43. Zhou C, Li LY, Lu GX (2005) Molecular cloning and character analysis of the mouse zinc finger protein gene Zfp474 exclusively expressed in testis and ovary. Yi chuan xue bao 32:155–162Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaohong Guo
    • 1
  • Yulong Guo
    • 1
  • Pengfei Gao
    • 1
  • Meng Li
    • 1
  • Yushu Jin
    • 1
  • Min Liu
    • 1
  • Wenqian Shi
    • 1
  • Junwen Han
    • 1
  • Bugao Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guoqing Cao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Animal Science and Veterinary MedicineShanxi Agricultural UniversityTaiguChina

Personalised recommendations