Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 12, pp 1653–1660 | Cite as

Cover crop farming system affects macroarthropods community diversity in Regosol of Caatinga, Brazil

  • Luan Nunes de Melo
  • Tancredo Augusto Feitosa de SouzaEmail author
  • Djail Santos
Original Article

Abstract

The influence of a 3-years cultivation of legumes on macroarthropod community composition was investigated. Soil samples were taken from a field experiment which was conducted for three years to characterize the agronomic characteristics of eight cover crops: Crotalaria juncea L., Crotalaria spectabilis Roth, Crotalaria ochroleuca G. Don., Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC., Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC., Dolichos lablab L., Neonotonia wightii (Wight & Arn.) J.A. Lackey, and Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. cv. Basilisk. The highest values of diversity in the macroarthropod community were found on the plot where M. pruriens was cultivated. Brachiaria decumbens cultivation showed lower values of species richness, Shannon’s diversity index and Simpson’s dominance index compared to the other studied plant species. Our findings suggest that the cultivation of legume cover crops can change positively the macroarthropod community composition. The results highlight the importance of considering the effects of legumes on the diversity of this biological component and their effect on plant growth and soil organic carbon contents. Thus, legumes may exploit positive feedback in semiarid conditions on a Regosol.

Keywords

Macroarthropod community composition Annual plant species Perennial plant species Soil biology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dr. Helena Freitas for valuable discussions and checking of English grammar. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, which greatly improved a previous version of the manuscript. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – “Finance Code 001”.

Authors’ contributions

We declare that all the authors made substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All the authors participate in drafting the article, revising it critically for important intellectual content; and finally, the authors gave final approval of the version to be submitted to Biologia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11756_2019_272_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (101 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 101 kb)

References

  1. Amazonas NT, Viani RAG, Rego MGA, Camargo FF, Fujihara RT, Valsechi OA (2017) Soil macrofauna density and diversity across a chronosequence of tropical forest restoration in southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 78:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.169014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JN, Ingram JSI (1989) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Black CA (1965) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. In: Black CA (ed) Agronomy monograph, vol 9. WI, Madison, pp 771–1572Google Scholar
  4. Coyle DR, Nagendra UJ, Taylor MK, Campbell JH, Cunard CE, Joslin AH, Mundepi A, Phillips CA, Callaham MA Jr (2017) Soil fauna responses to natural disturbances, invasive species, and global climate change: current state of the science and a call to action. Soil Biol Biochem 110:116–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Maestre FT, Ochoa V, Gozalo B, Reich PB, Singh BK (2018) Aridity decouples C:N:P stoichiometry across multiple trophic levels in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystem 21:459–468.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0161-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forbes AA, Bagley RK, Beer MA, Hippee AC, Widmayer HA (2018) Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order. BMC Ecol 18:21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0176-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson DA, Somers KM, Harvey HH (1989) Similarity coefficients: measures of co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence? Am Nat 133:436–453.  https://doi.org/10.1086/284927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li FR, Liu JL, Ren W, Liu LL (2018) Land-use change alters patterns of soil biodiversity in arid lands of northwestern China. Plant Soil 428:371–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3673-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luz RA, Fontes LS, Cardoso SRS, Lima ÉFB (2013) Diversity of the arthropod edaphic fauna in preserved and managed with pasture áreas in Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. Braz J Biol 73(3):483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manwaring M, Wallace HM, Weaver HJ (2018) Effects of a mulch layer on the assemblage and abundance of mesostigmatan mites and other arthropods in the soil of a sugarcane agro-ecosystem in Australia. Exp Appl Acarol 74:291–300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0227-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mauda EV, Joseph GS, Seymour CL, Munyai TC, Foord SH (2018) Changes in landuse alter ant diversity, assemblage composition and dominant functional groups in African savannas. Biodivers Conserv 27:947–965.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1474-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moura EG, Aguiar ACF, Piedade AR, Rousseau GX (2015) Contribution of legume tree residues and macrofauna to the improvement of abiotic soil properties in the eastern Amazon. Appl Soil Ecol 86:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ng K, Dricoll DA, Macfadyen S, Barton PS, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB (2017) Contrasting beetle assemblage responses to cultivated farmlands and native woodlands in a dynamic agricultural landscape. Ecosphere 8:e02042.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ng K, McIntyre S, Macfadyen S, Barton PS, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB (2018) Dynamic effects of ground-layer plant communities on beetles in a fragmented farming landscape. Biodivers Conserv 27:2131–2153.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1526-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okalebo JR, Gathua KW, Woomer PL (1993) Laboratory methods of plant and soil analysis: A working manual. Technical Bulletin No 1, Soil Science Society East Africa, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  16. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanable FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorous in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Department of Agriculture, WashigtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Phophi MM, Mafongoya PL, Odindo AO, Magwaza LS (2017) Screening cover crops for soil macrofauna abundance and diversity in conservation agriculture. Sustain Agric Res 6:142–149.  https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v6n4p142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  19. Roy S, Roy MM, Jaiswal AK, Baitha A (2018) Soil arthropods in maintaining soil health: thrust areas for sugarcane production systems. Sugar Tech (4):376–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0591-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva RA, Siqueira GM, Costa MKL, Guedes Filho O, Silva EFF (2018) Spatial variability of soil fauna under different land use and managements. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 42:e0170121.  https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170121
  22. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siqueira GM, Silva EFF, Paz-Ferreiro J (2014) Land use intensification effects in soil arthropod community of an entisol in Pernambuco state, Brazil. Sci World J 2014:625856.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/625856 Google Scholar
  24. Solen LC, Nicolas J, Xavier AS, Thibaud D, Simon D, Michel G, Johan O (2018) Impacts of agricultural practices and individual life characteristics on ecosystem services: a case study on family farmers in the context of an Amazonian Pioneer front. Environ Manag 61:772–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Souza TAF, Rodrígues AF, Marques LF (2015) Long-term effects of alternative and conventional fertilization on macroarthropod community composition: a field study with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivated on a Ferralsol. Org Agric 6:323–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0138-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Souza ST, Cassol PC, Baretta D, Bartz MLC, Klauberg Filho O, Mafra AL, Rosa MG (2016) Abundance and diversity of soil macrofauna in native forest, eucalyptus plantations, perennial pasture, integrated crop-livestock, and no-tillage cropping. Rev Bras de Cienc Solo 40:e0150248.  https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20150248
  27. Souza AVSS, Souza TAF, Santos D, Rios ES, Souza GJL (2018) Agronomic evaluation of legume cover crops for sustainable agriculture. Russ Agric Sci 44:31–38.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367418010093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vukicevich E, Lowery T, Bower P, Úrbez-Torres JR, Hart M (2016) Cover crops to increase soil microbial diversity and mitigate decline in perennial agriculture: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0385-7
  29. Wink C, Guedes JVC, Fagundes CK, Rovedder AP (2005) Insetos edáficos como indicadores da qualidade ambiental / soil borne insects as indicators of environmental quality. Rev Cienc Agrovet 4:60–71Google Scholar
  30. WRB (2006) (IUSS Working Group) World Reference Base for Soil World Soil Resources Reports, Rome: FAO (103):128Google Scholar
  31. Yang B, Zhang W, Xu H, Wang S, Xu X, Fan H, Chen HYH, Ruan H (2018) Effects of soil fauna on leaf litter decomposition under different land used in eastern coast of China. J For Res 29:973–982.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0521-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang P, Neher DA, Li B, Wu J (2018) The impacts of above- and belowground plant input on soil microbiota: invasive Spartina alterniflora versus native Phragmites australis. Ecosystem 21:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Agronomy, Agrarian Sciences CentreFederal University of ParaibaAreiaBrazil
  2. 2.Postgraduate Program in Soil Science, Department of Soils and Rural Engineering, Agrarian Sciences CentreFederal University of ParaibaAreiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations