Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 7, pp 797–812 | Cite as

A comprehensive study on nest materials of Vespa crabro and Polistes dominula: Chemical properties and biological characterization with antioxidant and antimicrobial activity

  • Omer Erturk
  • Emine BagdatliEmail author
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

A comprehensive study was conducted on the nest materials of Vespa crabro (Linnaeus, 1758) and Polistes dominula (Christ, 1791) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) of Black Sea region origin. Study of the physicochemical and surface properties, determination of the chemical-structural features, and bioactivity studies of the samples were carried out in four planned steps. In the first step, the physicochemical properties, the ratio of the plant material to the oral secretions, the water absorption and oil percentages as well as thermal analyses were researched. In the second step, observation of the surfaces under a light microscope and scanning electron microscope uncovered the surface properties. In the third step, chemical studies of the extracts from the solvents of different polarities (methanol, acetone and petroleum benzine) revealed the molecular functionalities of the biocompounds which were inside the materials using UV-Vis., FTIR, GC-MS, and elemental analysis techniques. In the last stage, the extracts underwent bioactivity research of antimicrobial and antioxidant screening with a phytochemical search of phenolic compound determination. The obtained data revealed the nesting properties and differences between the two species. In the P. dominula nest, the plant fibers were long and were glued regularly, and some were cross-linked and thick while in the V. crabro nest, the plant fibers were fine, grooved, thin and disordered. The comb surface of V. crabro was larger than that of P. dominula with minimum values of 75 and 37.5 cm2, respectively. The bioactivity research of the materials showed the high potential of the antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of some nests’ extracts. In all the extracts, the samples belonging to the V. crabro nest material had the highest biological activity.

Keywords

Vespa crabro Polistes dominula Antioxidant Antimicrobial SEM Morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge ODU/BAP (Ordu University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department, project number: AP-1716) for financial support and the Central Research Laboratory of Ordu University for TG/DTG and SEM-EDX analyses.

A part of this work was presented by O. Erturk at the conference of ‘3rd International Congress on Zoology and Technology (ICZAT)’, 12-15 July, 2017, Nevsehir, Turkey, by E. Bagdatli at the conference of ‘The Second Japan – Turkey International Symposium on Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Sciences (JATUSPAB-2)’, 11-12 September, 2017, Trabzon, Turkey and ‘The First International Technological Sciences and Design Symposium (ITESDES)’, 27-29 June, 2018, Giresun Üniversity, Giresun, Turkey.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Gillespie KM (2007) Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Nat Protoc 2:875–877.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagriacik N (2011) Determination of some structural features of the nest paper of Vespa orientalis Linnaeus, 1771 and Vespa crabro Linnaeus, 1758 (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in Turkey. Arch Biol Sci 63:449–455.  https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1102449B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baracchi D, Zaccaroni M, Cervo R, Turillazzi S (2010) Home range analysis in the study of spatial organization on the comb in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Ethology 116:579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01770.x Google Scholar
  4. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol 28:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenda TS, Tapasya B, Lawrence DE (2016) A review of silicon in soils and plants and its role in US agriculture: history and future perspectives. Soil Sci 181:393–411.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0000000000000179 Google Scholar
  6. Buck M, Marshall SA, Cheung DKB (2008) Identification atlas of the Vespidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) of the northeastern Nearctic region. Can J Arthropod Identif 5:311–312.  https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2008.05 Google Scholar
  7. Cole MR, Hansell MH, Seath CJ (2001) A quantitative study of the physical properties of nest paper in three species of Vespinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 48:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cozzolino D (2009) Near infrared spectroscopy in natural products analysis. Planta Med 75:46–756.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1112220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cranshaw W, Larsen H, Zimmerman R (2011) Notes on fruit damage by the European paper wasp, Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Southwest Entomol 36:103–105.  https://doi.org/10.3958/059.036.0110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Currie HA, Perry CC (2007) Silica in plants: biological, biochemical and chemical studies. Ann Bot 100:1383–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtis TR, Apante Y, Stamp NE (2005) Nest paper absorbency, tougness and protein concentration of a native vs. invasive social wasp. J Chem Ecol 31:1089–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-4249-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decker EA, Welch B (1990) Role of ferrritin as a lipid oxidation catalyst in muscle food. J Agric Food Chem 38:674–677.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00093a019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhivya SM, Kalaichelvi K (2017) UV-visible spectroscopic and FTIR analysis of Sarcostemma brevistigma, Wight. and Arn. Int J Curr Pharm Res 9:46–49.  https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2017v9i3.18890
  14. Erturk O (2006) Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ethanolic extracts from eleven spice plants. Biologia 61:275–278.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erturk O (2017) Determination of some structural features of the nest paper materials of Dolichovespula saxonica Fabricius, 1793 (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in Turkey. Entomol Res 47:286–294.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12208
  16. Espelie KE, Himmelbach DS (1990) Characterization of pedicel, paper and larval silk from nest of Polistes annularis (L.). J Chem Ecol 16:3467–3477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans HE, West-Eberhard MJ (1970) The wasps. University of Michigan Press, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan M, Dai D, Huang B (2012) Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for natural fibres. In: Salih MS (ed) Fourier transform. InTechOpen, pp 45–68Google Scholar
  19. Jain PK, Soni A, Jain P, Bhawsar J (2016) Phytochemical analysis of Mentha spicata plant extract using UV-VIS, FTIR and GC/MS technique. J Chem Pharm Res 8:1–6 ISSN: 0975-7384Google Scholar
  20. Jeanne RL (1975) The adaptiveness of social wasp nest architecture. Q Rev Biol 50:267–286.  https://doi.org/10.1086/408564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karsai I, Pénzes Z, Wenzel J (1996) Dynamics of colony development in Polistes dominulus: a modeling approach. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:97–105.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaya M, Bagriacik N, Seyyar O, Baran T (2015) Comparison of chitin structures derıved from three common wasp specıes (Vespa crabro Linnaeus, 1758, Vespa orientalis Linnaeus, 1771) and Vespula germanica (Fabricius, 1793). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 89:204–217.  https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21237
  23. Kosmeier D (2013) Hornets: gentle giants. Guestbook. http://www.vespa-crabro.de/directory.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2018
  24. Kudô K, Yamane SO, Yamamoto H (1998) Physiological ecology of nest construction and protein flow in pre-emergence colonies of Polistes chinensis (Hymenoptera Vespidae): effects of rainfall and microclimates. Ethol Ecol Evol 10:171–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1998.9522865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kudô K, Yamane SO, Mateus S, Tsuchida K, Ito Y, Miyano S, Yamamoto H, Zucchi R (2001) Nest materials and some chemical characteristics of nests of a New World swarm founding Polistinae wasp, Polybia paulista (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 13:351–360.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2001.9522766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsuura M (1991) Vespa and Provespa. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, pp 232–241Google Scholar
  27. Mishra K, Ojha H, Chaudhury NK (2012) Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH. Assay: a critical review and results. Food Chem 130:1036–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohan C, Balamurugan V, Salini ST, Rekha R (2012) Metal ion chelating activity and hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity of medicinal plant Kalanchoe pinnata S. J Chem Pharm Res 4:197–202 ISSN: 0975-7384Google Scholar
  29. Nur Alam M, Bristi NJ, Rafiquzzaman M (2013) Review on in vivo and in vitro methods evaluation of antioxidant activity. Saudi Pharmaceut J 21:143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pickett KM, Carpenter JM (2010) Simultaneous analysis and the origin of eusociality in the Vespidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Arthropod Struct Dev 68:3–33.  https://doi.org/10.3897/JHR.32.4685 Google Scholar
  31. Posokhov Y, Erten S, Koz O, Anıl H, Kirmizigul S, Icli S (2005) UV/VIS spectral properties of novel natural products from Turkish lichens. Int J Photoen 7:27–35.  https://doi.org/10.1155/S1110662X0500005X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Purmalis O, Porsnovs D, Klavins M (2011) Differential Thermal Analysis of peat and peat humic acids. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University: Mater Sci Appl Chem 89-94:1407–7353Google Scholar
  33. Renuka B, Sanjeev B, Ranganathan D (2016) Evaluation of phytoconstituents of Caralluma nilagiriana by FTIR and UV-VIS spectroscopic analysis. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 5:105–108.  https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2015.3.4 Google Scholar
  34. Spradbery JV (1973) Wasps. An account of the biology and natural history of social and solitary wasps. Sidgwick & Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. van de Westeringh C, Veldstra H (1958) Researches on plant growth regulators, XXIV. Structure/activity, IX. Tetrazole derivatives. Recl Trav Chim Pays-Bas 77:1107–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19580771204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wenzel JW (1991) Evolution of nest architecture. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, pp 480–507Google Scholar
  37. Witte CP (2011) Urea metabolism in plants. Plant Sci 180:431–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woraratphoku J, Intarapichet KO, Indrapichate A (2007) Phenolic compounds and antioxidative properties of selected wines from the northeast of Thailand. Food Chem 104:1485–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamane S, Kudo K, Tajima T, Nihon’yanagi K, Shinoda M, Saito K, Yamamoto H (1999) Comparison of investment in nest construction by the foundresses of consubgeneric Polistes wasps, P. (P olistes) riparius and P. (P.) chinensis (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). J Ethol 16:97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769288

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Faculty of Arts and SciencesOrdu UniversityOrduTurkey
  2. 2.Chemistry Department, Faculty of Arts and SciencesOrdu UniversityOrduTurkey

Personalised recommendations