, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 169–172 | Cite as

Mass spring recolonization of agroecosystems by the spider Oedothorax apicatus (Linyphiidae: Erigoninae)

  • Milan ŘezáčEmail author
  • Veronika Řezáčová
Short Communication


One of the main properties of spiders increasing their pest regulation potencial is their use of passive dispersal, employing wind and silk fibers. This behaviour is crucial for the spidersʼ usefulness as pest control agent in agroecosystems as their fauna is regularly decimated by agricultural disturbances such as ploughing, cutting or application of pesticides and thus has to be regularly restored by recolonisation. In early spring we witnessed the mass dispersal of the linyphiid spider Oedothorax apicatus (Blackwall, 1850) in the central European agricultural landscape. During the first sunny days of 2017 we observed horizontally oriented “sheet webs” continuously covering grassland vegetation on circa 3000 m2 area. We estimated over three million O. apicatus individuals were present in the study area. The observed sheet webs were probably an accumulation of O. apicatus draglines. The majority of collected spiders tended to disperse in laboratory conditions. Most of those performed “tip-toeing” behaviour that precedes ballooning, the rest performed dropping on dragline that precedes rapelling dispersal.


Ballooning Dragline Dispersal Rapelling 



We thank Petr Kocián and Tomáš Krejčí who drew our attention to the described phenomenon. Petr Kocián provided photos and collected the material for the analysis. Further we thank Martin Schmidt-Entling and Dries Bonte for scientific suggestions, and Michelle Strickland (University of Nottingham, UK) for linguistic corrections of the manuscript.


This study was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (grant number 17-10976S) and by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (grant number RO0418). VŘ was supported by the long-term development programRVO61388971.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.


  1. Akkerhuis GAJMJ, Rossing WAH, Piet GJ, Everts JW (1997) Water depletion, an important cause of mortality in females of the spider Oedothorax apicatus after treatment with deltamethrin: a simulation study. Pestic Biochem Physiol 58:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkerhuis GAJMJ, Seidelin N, Kjaer C (1999) Are we analysing knockdown in the right way? How independence of the knockdown-recovery process from mortality may affect measures for behavioural effects in pesticide bioassays. Pestic Sci 55:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basedow T, Toth F, Kiss J (1999) The species composition and frequency of spiders (Araneae) in fields of winter wheat in Hungary (northwest of Budapest) and in Germany (north of Frankfurt/M.). an attempt of comparison. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 12:263–266.
  4. Bell JR, Bohan DR, Shaw EM et al (2005) Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models. Bull Entomol Res 95:69–114Google Scholar
  5. Birkhofer K, Gavish-Regev E, Endlweber K, Lubin YD, Von Berg K, Wise DH, Scheu S (2008) Custorial spiders retard initial aphid population growth at low densities in winter wheat. Bull Entomol Res 98:249–255.
  6. Blick T, Pfiffner L, Luka H (1999) Ground-living spiders on arable land in North-Western Switzerland with a central European comparison (Arachnida: Araneae). Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 12:267–276Google Scholar
  7. Bonte D, De Blauwe I, Maelfait JP (2003a) Environmental and genetic background of tiptoe-initiating behaviour in the dwarf spider Erigone atra. Anim Behav 66:169–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonte D, Vandenbroecke N, Lens L, Maelfait JP (2003b) Low propensity for aerial dispersal in specialist spiders from fragmented landscapes. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 270:1601–1607.
  9. Bonte D, Vanden Borre J, Lens L, Maelfait JP (2006) Geographic variation in wolf spider dispersal behaviour is related to landscape structure. Anim Behav 72:655–662. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonte D, Bossuyt B, Lens L (2007) Aerial dispersal plasticity under different wind velocities in a salt marsh wolf spider. Behav Ecol 18:438–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonte D, Lukac M, Lens L (2008a) Starvation affects two aerial dispersal decisions in Erigone-spiders in a different way. Basic Appl Ecol 9:308–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonte D, Travis JMJ, De Clercq N, Zwertvaegher I, Lens L (2008b) Thermal conditions during juvenile development affect adult dispersal in a spider. Poc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17000–17005.
  13. Dinter A (1997) Intraguild-predation between spiders, carabid beetles and lacewing larvae and effects of multispecies interactions on aphid populations. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 11:717–720Google Scholar
  14. Dinter A (1998) Intraguild predation between erigonid spiders, lacewing larvae and carabids. J Appl Entomol 122:163–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinter A (2002) Microcosm studies on intraguild predation between female erigonid spiders and lacewing larvae and influence of single versus multiple predators on cereal aphids. J Appl Entomol 126:249–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eberhard WG (1987) How spiders initiate airborne lines. J Arachnol 15:1–9Google Scholar
  17. Framenau V, Macpherson M, Munro D (2011) Gossamer Extraordinaire. Aust Arachnol 82:5–7Google Scholar
  18. Isaia M, Beikes S, Paschetta M, Sarvajayakesevalu S, Badino G (2010) Spiders as potential biological controllers in apple orchards infested by Cydia spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). In: Nentwig W, Entling M, Kropf C (eds) Proceedings of 24th European Congress of Arachnology. University of Bern, Bern, pp 25–29Google Scholar
  19. Kalushkov P, Blagoev G, Deltshev C (2008) Biodiversity of epigeic spiders in genetically modified (Bt) and conventional (non-Bt) potato fields in Bulgaria. Acta Zool Bulg 60:61–69Google Scholar
  20. Kuusk AK, Ekbom B (2012) Feeding habits of lycosid spiders in field habitats. J Pest Sci 85:253–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemke A, Poehling HM (2002) Sown weed strips in cereal fields: overwintering site and "source" habitat for Oedothorax apicatus (Blackwall) and Erigone atra (Blackwall) (Araneae : Erigonidae). Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:67–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madeira F, Tscharntke T, Elek Z, Kormann UG, Pons X, Rösch V, Samu F, Scherber C, Batary P (2016) Spillover of arthropods from cropland to protected calcareous grassland – the neighbouring habitat matters. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:127–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marc P, Canard A, Ysnel F (1999) Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:229–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morley EL, Robert D (2018) Electric fields elicit ballooning in spiders. Curr Biol 28:2324–2330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nienstedt KM, Poehling HM (2004) Invertebrate predation of N-15-marked prey in semi-field wheat enclosures. Entomol Exp Appl 112:191–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nyffeler M, Breene RG (1992) Dominant insectivorous polyphagous predators in winter wheat: high colonization power, spatial dispersion patterns, and probable importance of the soil surface spiders (Araneae). Dtsch Entomol Z 39:177–188Google Scholar
  27. Pekár S, Michalko R, Loverre P, Líznarová E, Černecká Ľ (2015) Biological control in winter: novel evidence for the importance of generalist predators. J Appl Ecol 52:270–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmidt MH, Tscharntke T (2005) The role of perennial habitats for central European farmland spiders. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:235–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt MH, Thewes U, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2004) Aphid suppression by natural enemies in mulched cereals. Entomol Exp Appl 113:87–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suenaga H, Hamamura T (2015) Effects of manipulated density of the wolf spider, Pardosa astrigera (Araneae: Lycosidae), on pest populations and cabbage yields: a field enclosure experiment. Appl Entomol Zool 50:89–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Svobodová Z, Habuštová O, Sehnal F, Holec M, Hussein HM (2013) Epigeic spiders are not affected by the genetically modified maize MON 88017. J Appl Entomol 137:56–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tahir HM, Butt A (2009) Predatory potential of three hunting spiders inhabiting the rice ecosystems. J Pest Sci 82:217–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thorbek P, Sunderland KD, Topping CJ (2003) Eggsac development rates and phenology of agrobiont linyphiid spiders in relation to temperature. Entomol Exp Appl 109:89–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Volkmar C, Freier B (2003) Spider communities in Bt. Maize and not genetically modified maize fields. J Plant Dis Prot 110:572–582Google Scholar
  35. Weiss B, Buchs W, Harenberg A (1997) Development of the spider community after tillage of a six year set aside with natural succession. Verh Ges Ökol 27:379–384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biodiversity LaboratoryCrop Research InstitutePrague 6 – RuzyněCzech Republic
  2. 2.Laboratory of Fungal Biology, Institute of MicrobiologyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 4 – KrčCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations