, Volume 73, Issue 8, pp 743–751 | Cite as

Genetic survey on a reed-bed in Central Italy showing early die-back symptoms

  • Edoardo Sarti
  • Lorenzo Lastrucci
  • Daniela Gigante
  • Andrea CoppiEmail author
Original Article


Phragmites australis die-back is a well known phenomenon in Central Europe and rather recently observed also in some Mediterranean wetlands. In this study we analyze the genetic structure of a reed-bed in a protected wetland in N-W Tuscany (Italy) recently showing some clear symptoms of die-back, in particular the clumped growth-form, searching for any possible relationships with the ecological condition or the health status of common reed stands. After a diachronic analysis of vegetation maps (from 1988 to 2013) and a field survey, we have sampled four temporarily emerged and four permanent submerged reed stands, being the submersion regime a crucial trigger of reed die-back. Aquatic plots showed two clear conditions, with the presence of clumped and non-clumped stands. Emerged stands have been sampled in areas showing temporarily stable, increasing and decreasing reed-bed surface. In order to investigate the genetic structure of the population, the AFLP technique was applied on 69 individuals. The total reedbed surface showed a decrease in the observed time, partly due to the human activities and partly attributable to the RDBS. In several areas of the Lake the reed-bed appeared clumped and fragmented. The genetic analysis put in evidence a rather high level of genetic diversity, compared to the results of previous international studies on other populations of the same species. No significant differences between temporarily and permanently submerged stands were found. The major portion of genetic variation appeared within sampling sites rather than between sampling sites, indicating the absence of isolation between the different reed stands of the lake and a negligible role of genetic diversity in the occurrence of die-back symptoms.


AFLP approach Genetic structure Historical vegetation map analysis Phragmites australis Tuscany 



The authors would like to thank Bruno Foggi and Lorella Dell’Olmo (Department of Biology, University of Florence) and Barbara Vietina (Municipality of Montignoso) for their useful help during the research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of the manuscript.


  1. Armstrong J, Armstrong W, van der Putten WH (1996) Phragmites die-back: bud and root death blockages within the aeration and vascular systems and the possible role of phytotoxins. New Phytol 133:399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong J, Afreen-Zobayed F, Blyth S, Armstrong W (1999) Phragmites australis: effects of shoot submergence on seedling growth and survival and radial oxygen loss from roots. Aquat Bot 64:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brix H (1999a) Genetic diversity, ecophysiology and growth dynamics of reed (Phragmites australis). Aquat Bot 64:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brix H (1999b) The European research project on reed die-back and progression (EUREED). Limnologica 29:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brix H, Cížková H (2001) Introduction: Phragmites-dominated wetlands, their functions and sustainable use. Aquat Bot 69:87–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clevering OA (1998) Effects of litter accumulation and water table on morphology and productivity of Phragmites australis. Wetl Ecol Manag 5:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coppi A, Cecchi L, Mengoni A, Pustahija F, Tomović G, Selvi F (2014) Low genetic diversity and contrasting patterns of differentiation in the two monotypic genera Halacsya and Paramoltkia (Boraginaceae) endemic to the Balkan serpentines. Flora 209:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppi A, Lastrucci L, Cappelletti D, Cerri M, Ferranti F, Ferri V, Foggi B, Gigante D, Venanzoni R, Viciani D, Selvaggi R, Reale L (2018) AFLP approach reveals variability in Phragmites australis: implications for its die-back and evidence for genotoxic effects. Front Plant Sci 9:386. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Čurn V, Kubátová B, Vávřová P, Křiváčková-Suchá O, Čížková H (2007) Phenotypic and genotypic variation of Phragmites australis: comparison of populations in two human-made lakes of different age and history. Aquat Bot 86:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Blois S, Domon G, Bouchard A (2002) Landscape issues in plant ecology. Ecography 25:244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Den Hartog C, Květ J, Sukopp H (1989) Reed. A common species in decline. Aquat Bot 35:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  13. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro M (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distance among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  15. Fér T, Hroudova Z (2009) Genetic diversity and dispersal of Phragmites australis in a small river system. Aquat Bot 90:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foggi B, Lastrucci L, Geri F, Rocchini D (2015) Recent landscape changes on a small Mediterranean island. Landsc Res 40:437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogli S, Marchesini R, Gerdol R (2002) Reed (Phragmites australis) decline in a brackish wetland in Italy. Mar Environ Res 53:465–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gigante D, Venanzoni R, Zuccarello V (2011) Reed die-back in southern Europe? A case study from Central Italy. C R Biol 334:327–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gigante D, Angiolini C, Landucci F, Maneli F, Nisi B, Vaselli O, Venanzoni R, Lastrucci L (2014) New occurrence of reed-bed decline in southern Europe: do permanent flooding and chemical parameters play a role? C R Biol 337:487–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo W, Wang R, Zhuo S, Zhang S, Zhang Z (2003) Genetic diversity and clonal structure of Phragmites australis in the Yellow River delta of China. Biochem Syst Ecol 31:1093–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen DL, Lambertini C, Jampeetong A, Brix H (2007) Clone-specific differences in Phragmites australis: effects of ploidy level and geographic origin. Aquat Bot 86:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishii J, Kadono Y (2002) Factors influencing seed production of Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 72:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller BE (2000) Genetic variation among and within populations of Phragmites australis in the Charles River watershed. Aquat Bot 66:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kettenring KM, Mock KE (2012) Genetic diversity, reproductive mode, and dispersal differ between the cryptic invader, Phragmites australis, and its native conspecific. Biol Invasions 14:2489–2504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koppitz H (1999) Analysis of genetic diversity among selected populations of Phragmites australis world-wide. Aquat Bot 64:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koppitz H, Kühl H (2000) To the importance of genetic diversity of Phragmites australis in the development of reed stand. Wetl Ecol Manag 8:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koppitz H, Kühl H, Hesse K (1997) Some aspectes of the importance of genetic diversity in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex Steudel for the development of reed stands. Aquat Bot 110:217–223Google Scholar
  28. Křiváčková-Suchá O, Vávřová P, Čížková-Končalová H, Čurn V, Kubátová B (2007) Phenotypic and genotypic variation of Phragmites australis: a comparative study of clones originating from two populations of different age. Aquat Bot 86:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kühl H, Koppitz H, Rolletschek H, Kohl J-G (1999) Clone specific differences in a Phragmites australis stand. I. Morphology, genetics and site description. Aquat Bot 64:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) Mega3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambertini C, Gustafsson MHG, Frydenberg J, Lissner J, Speranza M, Brix H (2006) A phylogeographic study of the cosmopolitan genus Phragmites (Poaceae) based on AFLPs. Plant Syst Evol 258:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambertini C, Gustafsson MH, Frydenberg J, Speranza M, Brix H (2008) Genetic diversity patterns in Phragmites australis at the population, regional and continental scales. Aquat Bot 88:160–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lastrucci L, Gigante D, Vaselli O, Nisi B, Viciani D, Reale L, Coppi A, Fazzi V, Bonari G, Angiolini C (2016a) Sediment chemistry and flooding exposure: a fatal cocktail for Phragmites australis in the Mediterranean basin? Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 52:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lastrucci L, Valentini E, Dell’Olmo L, Vietina B, Foggi B (2016b) Hygrophilous vegetation and habitats of conservation interest in the area of the Lake porta (Tuscany, Central Italy). Atti Soc Tosc Sci Nat Mem Ser B 122:131–146Google Scholar
  35. Lastrucci L, Lazzaro L, Coppi A, Foggi B, Ferranti F, Venanzoni R, Cerri M, Ferri V, Gigante D, Reale L (2017) Demographic and macro-morphological evidence for common reed dieback in Central Italy. Plant Ecol Divers 10:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lastrucci L., Cerri M., Coppi A., Dell’Olmo L., Ferranti F., Ferri V., Filipponi F., Foggi B., Galardini R., Reale L., Venanzoni R., Viciani D., Gigante D., 2018 (In press, accepted). Spatial and temporal landscape patterns of declining reed-beds. Plant BiosystemsGoogle Scholar
  37. Li M, Gong L, Tian Q, Hu L, Guo W, Kimatu JN, Wang D, Liu B (2009) Clonal genetic diversity and populational genetic differentiation in Phragmites australis distributed in the Songnen prairie in Northeast China as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and sequence-specific amplification polymorphism molecular markers. Ann Appl Biol 154:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Neuhaus D, Kühl H, Kohl JG, Dörfel P, Börner T (1993) Investigation on the genetic diversity of Phragmites stands using genomic fingerprinting. Aquat Bot 45:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostendorp W (1989) ‘Die-back’ of reeds in Europe – a critical rewiew of literature. Aquat Bot 35:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostendorp W, Tiedge E, Rille S (2001) Effect of eutrophication on culm architecture of lakeshore Phragmites reeds. Aquat Bot 69:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Packer JG, Meyerson LA, Skalova H, Pysek P, Kueffer C (2017) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis. J Ecol 105:1123–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pellegrin D, Hauber DP (1999) Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steudel. Aquat Bot 63:241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qiu T, Jiang LL, Yang YF (2016) Genetic and epigenetic diversity and structure of Phragmites australis from local habitats of the Songnen prairie using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Genet Mol Res 15(3): gmr.15038585Google Scholar
  45. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL
  46. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The Neibour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Saltonstall K, Lambert A, Meyerson LA (2010) Genetics and reproduction of common (Phragmites australis) and giant reed (Arundo donax). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sani A, Lombardi T (2005) Le fitocenosi di particolare interesse conservazionistico presenti al Lago di Porta. Inform Bot Ital 37(B):824–825Google Scholar
  49. Shiga T, Yokogawa M, Kaneko S, Isagi Y (2017) Genetic diversity and population structure of Nuphar submersa (Nymphaeaceae), a critically endangered aquatic plant endemic to Japan, and implications for its conservation. J Plant Res 130:83–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437–460PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. van der Putten WH (1994) Assessing ecological change in European wetlands: how to know what parameters should be monitored to evaluate the die-back of common reed (Phragmites australis)? In: Aubrecht G, dick G, prentice C. (eds.) monitoring ecological change in wetlands of middle Europe, 31, Linz, pp. 61–68Google Scholar
  53. van der Putten WH (1997) Die-back of Phragmites australis in European wetlands: an overview of the European research programme on reed die-back and progression (1993-1994). Aquat Bot 59:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Viciani D, Dell’Olmo L, Gabellini A, Gigante D, Lastrucci L (2017) Landscape dynamics of Mediterranean montane grasslands over 60 years and implications for habitats conservation. A case study in the northern Apennines (Italy). Landsc res, published on line
  55. Vos P, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Watkinson AR, Powell JC (1993) Seedling recruitment and the maintenance of clonal diversity in plant populations-a computer simulation of Ranunculus repens. J Ecol 81:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeidler A, Schneider S, Jung C, Melchinger AE, Dittrich P (1994) The use of DNA fingerprinting in ecological studies of (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Botanica Acta 107(4):237–242Google Scholar
  58. Zhao X, Ma Y, Sun W, Wen X, Milne R (2012) High genetic diversity and low differentiation of Michelia coriacea (Magnoliaceae), a critically endangered endemic in Southeast Yunnan, China. Int J Mol Sci 13:4396–4411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.University Museum System, Natural History Museum (Botany), University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Biology and BiotechnologyUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations