Advertisement

Biologia

, Volume 74, Issue 6, pp 609–622 | Cite as

Long-term in situ sap flow monitoring in a mature Dracaena cinnabari tree on Socotra

  • N. NadezhdinaEmail author
  • A. Al-Okaishi
  • P. Maděra
Original Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Dracaena cinnabari is a relict of the remote Socotra Island (Yemen) where it grows at higher altitudes with the frequent occurrence of fogs. D. cinnabari as the only representative of the dragon tree group creates woodlands and forests on the Socotra Island. It is not clear what mechanisms allow this relict arborescent monocot to survive harsh climate and poor soil of karst rocks there. In this work, we conducted long-term sap flow monitoring in the stem and roots of the mature D. cinnabari plant during the driest period of year between two regular monsoons. We aimed to reveal plant responses to a range of environmental conditions and to understand mechanisms of drought survival by this woody monocot. Several following features of sap flow performance were found: high flow sectoriality in the stem and in roots corresponding to the intensity of insolation, free lateral flow, higher stem integrity compared to roots, internal storage replenishment from the fog followed by increased transpiration presumably from the refilled stem storage. Results indicate that in studying the sap flow dynamics in the mature D. cinnabari tree, plant water storage should be included in the analyses in addition to soil water availability and intensity of evaporating demands. The ability to replenish succulent woody organs from atmospheric water and to survive long periods of drought from the internal supply distinguishes the behavior of this short-rooted arborescent monocot from the known strategies of deep-rooted trees in arid areas.

Keywords

Arborescent monocot Fog Heat field deformation Internal plant storage Multi-point sensor Lateral flow Radial and circumferential variations Transpiration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the local authority of Socotra for the permission to conduct sap flow measurements on the mature D. cinnabari tree, to local inhabitants for their general help during the long-term sap flow monitoring and to Zdenek Cermak and Petr Nemec for the occasional equipment control. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and the Associated Editor for their constructive and thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11756_2018_185_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 6129 kb)

References

  1. Adolt R, Pavliš J (2004) Age structure and growth of Dracaena cinnabari populations on Socotra. Trees 18:43–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-003-0279-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adolt R, Habrová H, Maděra P (2012) Crown age estimation of a monocotyledonous tree species Dracaena cinnabari using logistic regression. Trees 26:1287–1298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0704-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adolt R, Maděra P, Abraham J, Čupa P, Svátek M, Matula R, Šebesta J, Čermák M, Volařík D, Koutecký T, Rejžek M, Šenfeldr M, Veska J, Habrová H, Čermák Z, Němec P (2013) Field survey of Dracaena cinnabari populations in Firmihin, Socotra Island: methodology and preliminary results. J Landsc Ecol 6:7–34.  https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2014-0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attorre F, Francesconi F, Taleb N, Scholte P, Saed A, Alfo M, Bruno F (2007) Will dragonblood survive the next period of climate change? Current and future potential distribution of Dracaena cinnabari (Socotra, Yemen). Biol Conserv 138:430–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–644.  https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown G, Mies BA (2012) Vegetation ecology of Socotra. Plant and Vegetation 7. Springers, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Buček A, Habrová H, Maděra P, Král K, Modrý M, Lacina J, Pavliš J (2015) Application of the Czech methodology of biogeographical landscape differentiation in geobiocoenological concept – examples from Cuba, Tasmania and Yemen. J Landsc Ecol 8:51–67.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2015-0014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess SSO, Dawson TE (2004) The contribution of fog to the water relations of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don): foliar uptake and prevention of dehydration. Plant Cell Environ 27:1023–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01207.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Culek M, Král K, Habrová H, Adolt R, Pavliš J, Maděra P (2006) Socotra’s annual weather pattern. In: Cheung C, DeVantier L, Van Damme K (eds) Socotra - a natural history of the islands and their people. Odyssey books and guides, Airphoto international ltd, Hong Kong, pp 42–45Google Scholar
  10. Dawson TE (1998) Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecol 117:476–485.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denk T, Güner HT, Grimm GW (2014) From mezic to arid: leaf epidermal features suggest preadaptation in Miocene dragon trees (Dracaena). Review Paleobot Palynol 200:211–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eller CB, Lima AL, Oliveira RS (2013) Foliar uptake of fog water and transport belowground alleviates drought effects in the cloud forest tree species, Drimys brasiliensis (Winteraceae). New Phytol 199:151–162.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gartner K, Nadezhdina N, Englisch M, Cermak J, Leitgeb E (2009) Sap flow of birch and Norway spruce during the European heat and drought in summer 2003. For Ecol Manag 258:590–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry HS (1982) Agaves of continental North America. In: Univ. Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldsmith GR (2013) Changing directions: the atmosphere–plant–soil continuum. New Phytol 199:4–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habrová H (2004) Geobiocoenological differentiation as a tool for sustainable land-use of Socotra Island. Ekol Bratislava 23:47–57Google Scholar
  17. Habrová H, Buček A (2013) Overview of biotope types of Socotra Island. J Landsc Ecol 6:60–83.  https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2014-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Habrová H, Čermák Z, Pavliš J (2009) Dragon’s blood tree – threatened by overmaturity, not by extinction: dynamics of a Dracaena cinnabari woodland in the mountains of Soqotra. Biol Conserv 142:772–778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.022
  19. Haushahn T, Speck T, Masselter T (2014) Branching morphology of decapitated arborescent monocotyledons with secondary growth. Amer J Bot 101:754–763.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jian S, Wu Z, Hu C, Zhang X (2016) Sap flow in response to rainfall pulses for two shrub species in the semiarid Chinese loess plateau. J Hydrol Hydromech 64:121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jupa R, Plichta R, Paschová Z, Nadezhdina N, Gebauer R (2017) Mechanisms underlying the long-term survival of the monocot Dracaena marginata under drought conditions. Tree Physiol 37:1182–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Král K, Pavliš J (2006) The first detailed land cover map of Socotra Island by Landsat/ETM+data. Int J Rem Sensing 27:3239–3250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600646557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krawczyszyn J, Krawczyszyn T (2014) Massive aerial roots growth and form of Dracaena draco. Trees 28:757–768.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-0987-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krawczyszyn J, Krawczyszyn T (2016) Photomorphogenesis in Dracaena draco. Trees 30:647–664.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1307-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maděra P, Habrová H, Šenfeldr M, Kholová I, Lvončík S, Ehrenbergerová L, Roth M, Nadezhdina N, Němec P, Rosenthal J, Pavliš J (2018) Growth dynamics of endemic Dracaena cinnabari Balf. f. Seedlings in situ on Socotra Island suggest essential elements for a conservation strategy. Biologia  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0152-0
  26. Martorell C, Ezcurra E (2002) Rosette scrub occurrence and fog availability in arid mountains of Mexico. J Veg Sci 13:651–662. https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0651:RSOAFA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  27. Martorell C, Ezcurra E (2007) The narrow-leaf syndrome: a functional and evolutionary approach to the form of fog-harvesting rosette plants. Oecol 151:561–573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0614-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller AG, Cope TA (1996) Flora of the Arabian peninsula and Socotra. University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  29. Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of environmental physics. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Munne-Bosch S, Alegre L (1999) Role of dew on the recovery of water-stressed Melissa officinalis L. plants. J Plant Physiol 154:759–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80255-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nadezhdina N (2018) Revisiting the heat field deformation (HFD) method for measuring sap flow. iForest 11:118–130.  https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2381-011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nadezhdina N, Nadezhdin V (2017) Are Dracaena nebulophytes able to drink atmospheric water? Environ Exp Bot 139:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.04.005
  33. Nadezhdina N, Čermák J, Nadezhdin V (1998) Heat field deformation method for sap flow measurements. In: Čermák J, Nadezhdina N (eds) Proceedings of the 4th Int. workshop on measuring sap flow in intact plants. Publishing house of Mendel University, Brno, pp 72–92Google Scholar
  34. Nadezhdina N, Čermák J, Ceulemans R (2002) Radial pattern of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors. Tree Physiol 22:907–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadezhdina N, Nadezhdin V, Gebauer R, Čermák J, David JS, David TS, Jimenez MS, Morales D (2012) Redistribution of water within the aboveground part of trees. Acta Hort 951:241–249.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.951.29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadezhdina N, Urban J, Čermák J, Nadezhdin V, Kantor P (2014) Comparative study of long-term water uptake of Norway spruce and Douglas-fir in Moravian upland. J Hydrol Hydromech 62:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2014-0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nadezhdina N, Čermák J, Downey A, Nadezhdin V, Peramaki M, David JS, Pinto CA, David TS (2015a) Sap flow index as an indicator of water storage use. J Hydrol Hydromech 63:124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2015-0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadezhdina N, Plichta R, Nadezhdin V, Gebauer R, Jupa R, Habrová H, Maděra P (2015b) A comparative structural and functional study of leaf traits and sap flow in Dracaena cinnabari and Dracaena draco seedlings. Funct Plant Biol 42:1092–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1071/FP15079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nadezhdina N, Al-Okaishi A, Maděra P (2018) Sap flow measurements in a Socotra dragon’s blood tree (Dracaena cinnabari) in its area of origin. Trop Plant Biol 11:107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-018-9204-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nadezhdina N, Gebauer R, Nadezhdin V, Plichta R (2019) Transport secrets of the dragon’s blood trees revealed through sap flow measurements following partial stem incision. Flora 250:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliveira RS, Eller CB, Bittencourt PRL, Mulligan M (2014) The hydroclimatic and ecophysiological basis of cloud forest distributions under current and projected climates. Ann Bot 113:909–920.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosado BHP, Holder CD (2013) The significance of leaf water repellency in ecohydrological research: a review. Ecohydrol 6:150–161.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmitt AK, Lee HSJ, Luttge U (1988) The response of the C3-CAM tree, Clusia rosea, to light and water stress: I. gas exchange characteristics. J Exp Bot 39:1581–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/39.11.1581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholte P, De Geest P (2010) The climate of Socotra Island (Yemen). A first-time assessment of the timing of the monsoon wind reversal and its influence on precipitation and vegetation patterns. J Arid Environ 74:1507–1515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simonin KA, Santiago LS, Dawson TE (2009) Fog interception by Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) crowns decouples physiology from soil water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 32:882–892.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01967.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strelcova K, Kurjak D, Lestianska A, Kovalcikova D, Ditmarova L, Skvarenina J, Ahmed YAR (2013) Differences in transpiration of Norway spruce drought stressed trees and trees well supplied with water. Biologia 68:1118–1122.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0257-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Udvardy MDF (1975) A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. IUCN Occasional Paper No. 18. Morges, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  48. Urban J, Gebauer R, Nadezhdina N, Čermák J (2012) Transpiration and stomatal conductance of mistletoe (Loranthus europaeus) and its host plant, downy oak (Quercus pubescens). Biologia 67:917–926.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0080-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeppel M, Macinnis-Ng CMO, Ford CR, Eamus D (2008) The response of sap flow to pulses of rain in a temperate Australian woodland. Plant Soil 305:121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9349-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmermann MH, Tomlinson PB (1970) The vascular system in the axis of Dracaena fragrans (Agavaceae) 2. Distribution and development of secondary tissue. J Arnold arboretum 51:478–491Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood TechnologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Environmental Protection AuthoritySocotraRepublic of Yemen

Personalised recommendations