Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phylogeny and classification of Voyria (Saprophytic Gentianaceae)

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cladistic analysis of the saprophytic genus Voyria Aubl. (Gentianaceae) was performed to evaluate infrageneric classification, character evolution, and biogeography. A matrix of 19 species of Voyria and 39 morphological characters yielded three most-parsimonious trees, one of which was identical to their strict consensus. The major division within Voyria based on character support is also the rooting point suggested by a larger cladistic analysis of gentians. We have chosen to treat these distinct clades as two new subgenera, Voyria subgen. Voyria Aubl. and Voyria subgen. Leiphaimos (Schltdl. & Cham.) V. A. Albert & L. Struwe, stat. nov. Concerning character evolution, Voyria subgen. Voyria (5 spp.) is the most similar to other Gentianaceae. The saprophytic condition is more advanced in Voyria subgen. Leiphaimos (14 spp.), in which stomates and a continuous vascular cylinder are lacking. Within subgen. Leiphaimos, trends toward extreme vascular reduction and wind-mediated seed dispersal are evident. The extensive character evolution observed within Voyria as a whole may correlate with relaxation of autotrophic structural constraints. Optimization of an area of distribution character on the cladograms obtained suggests that Guayana (and therefore northern South America) may represent the most ancestral area for extant Voyria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Albert, V. A. 1994. Cladistic relationships of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae: Orchidaceae) from congruent morphological and molecular data. Lindleyana 9: 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, S. E. Williams & M. W. Chase. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491–1495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aublet, J. B. C. F. 1775. Histoire des plantes de la Guiane Françoise. Vol. 1. Pierre-François Didot, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K. 1992. Ancestral areas: a cladistic reinterpretation of the center of origin concept. Syst. Biol. 41: 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, F. & A. Louis. 1990. Seed structure in Voyria primuloides Baker (Gentianaceae): taxonomic and ecological implications. Pages 261–270. In: J. Paré, M. Bugnicourt, J. Mortier, M. Juguet, F. Vignon & J. Vignon, editors. Some aspects and actual orientations in plant embryology. Université de Picardie, Amiens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S. 1974. Island biogeography. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don, G.. 1838. A general history of the dichlamydeous plants. Vol. 4. J. G. & F. Rivington, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R. L. 1993. Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, T. S. & A. Robyns. 1975. Family 160. Gentianaceae. Pages 61–101. In: R. E. Woodson Jr., R. W. Schery & collaborators. Flora of Panama. Part VIII. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62.

  • Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18: 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1989. The retention index and rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkmann, G. 1991. Flavonoids as flower pigments: the formation of the natural spectrum and its extension by genetic engineering. Pl. Breed. 106: 1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, T. E. & J. M. Trappe 1971. Phylogeny and ecology of mycotrophic achlorophyllous angiosperms. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46: 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, A. K. & C. N. Barron. 1993. The geology of the Guiana Shield. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 22. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, E. 1895. Gentianaceae. Pages 50–108. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, editors. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol. 2. (2). Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisebach, A. H. R. 1839. Genera et species Gentianearum. J. G. Cotta, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1845. Gentianaceae. Pages 38–141. In: A. de Candolle. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Vol. 9. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H., editor. 1985. Flowering plants of the world. Croom Helm, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. & J. S. Farris 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M. & M. Luckow. 1993. Origins and relationships of tropical North America in the context of the boreotropics hypothesis. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, A. J. M. & P. W. Leenhouts. 1980. Taxonomy. Pages 8–96. In: A. J. M. Leeuwenberg, editor. Engler and Prantl's Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Angiospermae: Ordnung Gentianales, Fam. Loganiaceae. Vol. 28b (1). Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, P. J. M. & T. Rübsamen 1986. Triuridaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 40. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & P. Ruyters. 1986. Voyria and Voyriella (saprophytic Gentianaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 41. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & collaborators. 1986. Saprophytes pro parte. Introduction to Flora Neotropica Monographs 40, 41, 42. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P. & D. R. Maddison. 1992. Mac-Clade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Ver. 3.0. Computer program and documentation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B. & B. M. Boom. 1989. Gentianaceae. Part 3. Pages 2–56. In: B. Maguire & collaborators. The botany of the Guayana Highland. Part XIII. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 51.

  • Martin, C. & T. Gerats. 1993. Control of pigment biosynthesis genes during petal development. Pl. Cell 5: 1253–1264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mickevitch, M. F. 1981. Quantitative phylogenetic biogeography. Pages 209–222. In: V. A. Funk & D. R. Brooks, editors. Advances in cladistics: proceedings of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, F. A. W. 1849. Voyriae species quasdam surinamenses recenset. Tijdschr. Wis.—Natuurk. Wetensch. Eerste Kl. Kon. Ned. Inst. Wetensch. 2: 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, F. A. W. 1851. Gentianeae parasiticae. Pages 146–151. In: Stirpes surinamensis selectae.

  • Nilsson, S. & J. J. Skvarla. 1969. Pollen morphology of saprophytic taxa in the Gentianaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 56: 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehler, E. 1927. Entwicklungsgeschichtlich-zytologische Untersuchungen an einigen saprophytischen Gentianaceen. Planta 3: 641–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrot, M.E. 1897 [1899]. Anatomie comparée des Gentianacées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., sér. 8, 7: 105–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., editor. 1982. Biological diversification in the tropics; proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of the Association for Tropical Biology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progel, A. 1865. Gentianaceae. Pages 197–248. In: C. F. P. de Martius, editor. Flora Brasiliensis. Vol. 6(1). Fleischer, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynal, A. 1967. Étude critique des genres Voyria et Leiphaimos (Gentianaceae) et révision des Voyria d'Afrique. Adansonia, sér. 2, 7: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist, F. 1994 Ancestral areas and parsimony. Syst. Biol. 43: 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlechtendal, D. F. L. von & L. K. A. von Chamisso. 1831. Plantarum mexicanarum a cel. viris Schiede et Deppe collectarum recensio brevis. Addenda. Linnaea 6: 385–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, R. T. & J. T. Polhemus. 1981. Analysis of taxonomic congruence among morphological, ecological, and biogeographic data sets for the Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera). Syst. Zool. 29: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski, J. B. 1993: “Unordered” versus “ordered” characters. Syst. Biol. 42: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solereder, H. 1908. Systematische Anatomie der Dicotyledonen. Ergänzungsband. F. Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P. C. 1919. The Panamanian species of Leiphaimos. Pages 194–200. In: Studies of tropical american phanerogams no. 3, Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 20.

  • Struwe, L. & V. A. Albert. 1996. Phylogenetics of Guayanan Gentianaceae. Fl. Guianas Newslett. 11: 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— & B. Bremer. 1994 [1995]. Cladistics and family level classification of the Gentianales. Cladistics 10: 175–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP—Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Ver. 3.1.1. Computer program and manual distributed by Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffney, B. H. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 243–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, T. 1989. Las selvas de Uxpanapa, Veracruz-Oaxaca, Mexico: evidencia de refugios florísticos cenozoicos. Anales del Instituto de Biología, U.N.A.M., Ser. Bot. 58: 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. E., V. A. Albert & M. W. Chase. 1994. Relationships of Droseraceae: a cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1027–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. A. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography of the Northern Hemisphere during late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 264–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. E., Jr. & R. E. Weaver Jr. 1982. The genera of Gentianaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 63: 441–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zona, S. 1990. A monograph of Sabal (Arecaceae: Coryphoideae). Aliso 12: 583–666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics Studies, The New York Botanical Garden, 10458-5126, Bronx, NY, USA

    Victor A. Albert & Lena Struwe

Authors
  1. Victor A. Albert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lena Struwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albert, V.A., Struwe, L. Phylogeny and classification of Voyria (Saprophytic Gentianaceae). Brittonia 49, 466–479 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2807736

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2807736

Key words

Search

Navigation