Disease Management & Health Outcomes

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 215–224 | Cite as

Evaluation of an Online Relapse Prevention Program for Bipolar Disorder

An Overview of the Aims and Methodology of a Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Caryl Barnes
  • Robin Harvey
  • Philip Mitchell
  • Michael Smith
  • Kay Wilhelm
Leading Article

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is a chronic relapsing remitting illness affecting 1–2% of the general adult population. Awareness of the limitations of pharmacological treatment for this disorder has encouraged the development of psychological treatments and a large body of evidence now exists demonstrating the effectiveness of several types of psychosocial interventions in the treatment and prevention of relapse for bipolar disorder. Unfortunately, it is difficult for many individuals with bipolar disorder to access such programs due to financial constraints and restricted roll-out. One solution to this difficulty is to use Internet-based delivery of targeted psychoeducation, cognitive behavior management and online medication monitoring to improve relapse prevention for those with bipolar disorder.

The focus of this article is to discuss the aims and methodology of this unique, collaborative randomized control trial that evaluates the effectiveness of an Internet-based disease management program (termed Recovery Road [RR]). The RR program incorporates both symptom monitoring with feedback, and targeted psychosocial treatment for adults with bipolar disorder delivered over a 12-month period. The overall aim was to determine whether this web-based adjunctive relapse prevention program can improve mental health outcomes. Upon successful enrolment, participants were automatically randomized into either the intervention (RR) or control group. The control group received some relevant information but did not include program components considered to be active parts of the experimental intervention.

This article also describes a recruitment, enrolment and randomization process that maximizes the potential of the Internet for research and data collection purposes. At the time of writing full results were not yet available and, thus, were not reported in this article. Interim outcomes indicate that the online enrolment has been successful and participants are making full use of all online features of the active program included by the support facility. The difficulties with maintaining individuals on the control program are described and samples of typical anecdotal comments provided by participants to the research group via the support facility are presented.

Keywords

Bipolar Disorder Mental Health Service Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Mental Health Difficulty Sheehan Disability Scale 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the following individuals: Gavin Pinto, IT Architect and designer of web-based platform, Sentiens Pty Ltd, Perth, Western Australia; Dr Dennis Tannenbaum, Consulting Psychiatrist and Executive Chair, Sentiens Pty Ltd, Perth, Western Australia; Professor Gordon Parker, Executive Director, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales; and Sue Grdovic, Project Manager Community and Consumer Programs, Black Dog Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Dr Barnes has received a scholarship grant from the University of New South Wales. Professors Mitchell and Wilhelm have received a NH&MRC program grant 230802 and NSW Centre for Mental Health Infrastructure grant. Dr Barnes was a past employee of Sentiens Pty Ltd (formally Infrapsych). Dr Harvey is employed as the Research and Development Manager for Sentiens Pty Ltd. Mr Smith is employed as a research officer at Sentiens Pty Ltd. Professors Mitchell and Wlihelm have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhoa S. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Co-Morbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angst J. The emerging epidemiology of hypomania and bipolar-II disorder. J Affect Disord 1998; 50: 143–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. The World Health Organization. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woods SW. The economic burden of bipolar disease. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 Suppl. 13: 38–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. Manic-depressive illness. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keck PE, McElory SL, Strakowski SM, et al. Compliance with maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder. Psychopharmacol Bull 1997; 33(1): 87–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coryell W, Scheftner W, Keller M, et al. The enduring psychosocial consequences of mania and depression. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 720–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gitlin MJ, Swendsen J, Heller TL, et al. Relapse and impairment in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152(11): 1635–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, et al. The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59: 530–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huxley NA, Parikh SV, Baldessarini RJ. Effectiveness of psychosocial treatments in bipolar disorder: state of the evidence. Harvard Rev Psychiatry 2000; 8: 126–40Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colom F, Vieta E, Reinares M, et al. Psychoeducation efficacy in bipolar disorders: beyond compliance enhancement. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 1101–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miklowitz DJ. Review of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67 Suppl. 11: 28–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott J. Psychotherapy for bipolar disorders: efficacy and effectiveness. J Psychopharmacol 2006; 20 (2 Suppl.): 46–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colom F, Lam D. Psychoeducation: improving outcomes in bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2005; 20: 359–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell PM, Malhi GS, Redwood BL, et al. For the RANZCP Clinical Practice Guideline Team for Bipolar Disorder. Summary of the guidelines for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Aust Psychiatry 2003; 11: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159 Suppl. 4: 1–50Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor CB, Jobson KO, Winzelberg AJ, et al. The use of the Internet to provide evidence-based integrated treatment programs for mental health. Psychiatric Ann 2002; 32: 671–7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christensen H, Griffiths KM. The internet and mental health practice. Evid Based Ment Health 2003; 6(3): 66–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Titov N. Status of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for adults. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007; 41: 95–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet; randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 328(7434): 265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clarke G, Redi E, Eubanks D, et al. Overcoming Depression on the Internet (ODIN): a randomised control trial of an Internet depression skills intervention program. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4: e14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clarke G, Eubanks D, Reid E, et al. Overcoming Depression on the Internet (ODIN) (2): a randomised trial of a self-help depression skills program with reminders. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7: e16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lange A, Schrieken B, van de Ven JP, et al. ’Interapy’: the effects of a short protocolled treatment of posttraumatic stress and pathological grief through the internet. Behav Cognitive Psychother 2000; 28: 175–92Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Celio AA, Winzelberg AJ, Wilfley DE, et al. Reducing risk factors for eating disorders; comparison of internet and classroom delivered psychoeducation. J Consulting Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 650–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tate DF, Wing RR, Winette RA. Using technology to deliver a behavioural weight loss program. JAMA 2001; 285: 1172–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tannenbaum D, Barnes C. Infrapsych bipolar affective disorder recovery road program. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6 Suppl. 1: 24Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th rev ed. Washingtion, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnes C, Mitchel P, Wilhelm K. Preventing relapse in people with bipolar disorder using the www-interim results of a RCT [abstract]. ANZ J Psych 2005; 39 Suppl. 2: A30–1Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bauer M, Grof P, Gyulai L, et al. Using technology to improve longitudinal studies: self-reporting with ChronoRecord in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6(1): 67–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10: 799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, et al. A rating scale for mania; reliability, validity, sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 429–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hirschfeld R, Holzer C, Calabrese C. Validity of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: a general population study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 170–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assessment 1998; 10: 176–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-1/P). New York: Biometrics Research Department, Columbia University, 2001Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bauer MS, Vojta C, Kinosian B, et al. The internal state scale; replication of its discriminating abilities in a multisite, public sector sample. Bipolar Disord 2000; 2: 340–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Raj BA. A measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 11 Suppl. 3: 89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caryl Barnes
    • 1
  • Robin Harvey
    • 2
  • Philip Mitchell
    • 1
  • Michael Smith
    • 2
  • Kay Wilhelm
    • 1
  1. 1.Black Dog Institute, School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Sentiens Pty LtdUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations