Population-Based Disease Management in the German Statutory Health Insurance
Social healthcare systems in Europe must cope with aging populations and rising costs. For the German social healthcare system, which dates back to the 19th century, this problem is especially apparent, as soaring structural unemployment and the demographic transition of the population threaten the financial basis of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) [Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung]. In order to preserve free access to high-quality care and mandatory insurance for most of the population with affordable contributions, the traditional methods of healthcare delivery are challenged. As a result of its historic development, the system is tailored to acute care. Infectious diseases and accidents, however, have lost their relevance as main sources of mortality and morbidity of the population.
Chronic diseases that can be influenced in their course by patient self-management and preventive measures dominate as causes of morbidity, mortality, and rising costs of healthcare. Since cost-containment measures can no longer stabilize cost development, structural reforms are strongly advocated. The implementation of a legal framework for disease management programs is the first of several structural reform measures implemented in the SHI.
Diseases for which a legal framework has been approved include type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, breast cancer, and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality requirements for the programs are high and include a central-accreditation process, evaluation in 3-year intervals by independent investigators, and specific quality management measures outlined for each disease. Major features of the programs include a population-based, patient-centric, and physician-based design. Since 2002, >1.6 million patients were enrolled in diabetes programs nationwide.
Preliminary results point to positive effects of the programs on outcomes and process parameters, such as blood glucose and blood pressure readings or performed yearly eye examinations for patients with diabetes. Differences in the German and the US approach to disease management not only include a top-down versus a bottom-up approach; the German approach aims at secondary prevention regardless of risk state, co-morbidities, and possible cost savings, whereas in the US high-risk approaches are common. For the US, the German physician-based approach to disease management could be of interest in the evolving Medicare programs whereas German programs could become more effective drawing on US pay-for-quality experiences.
Disease management, whether vendor or physician based, may not be the ultimate solution to all problems in the care of chronically ill patients, but it may facilitate change from a system traditionally focused on acute care to one focused on chronic care.
KeywordsDisease Management Disease Management Program Sickness Fund Statutory Health Insurance Quality Improvement Strategy
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
- 3.Crippen DL. Congressional Budget Office testimony before the United States Senate Special Committee on Aging, Disease Management in Medicare: data analysis and benefit design issues [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?.index=3776&sequence=0 [Accessed 2004 Oct 28]
- 5.Etheredge L, Moore J. A new Medicaid program. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; Suppl Web Exclusives: W3-426-39Google Scholar
- 14.Eichenlaub A, Steiner M, Riedel D, Maetzel J, Kaatz I, Reiche R. Final report: evaluation of a model program diabetes Saxony-Anhalt [in German]. Köln: Prognos, 2004Google Scholar
- 17.Advisory Council for the Concerted Action in Health Care. Appropriateness and efficiency: Volume III. Overuse, underuse and misuse [in German] [online]. Nomos: Baden Baden, 2000/01: 80–1Google Scholar
- 18.Lauterbach KW, Stock S, Redaèlli M, Kühn M, Lungen M. Disease Management in Germany: a framework for development, implementation and evaluation in the Statutory Health Insurance [in German] [online]. Cologne: Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology of the University of Cologne, 2001: 1–333. Available from URL: http://www.medizin.uni-koeln.de/kai/igmg/guta/GutachtenDMP.pdf [Accessed 2004 Nov 15]Google Scholar
- 20.Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security (BMGS) [in German] [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bmgs.bund.de/downloads/Kennzahlen_und_Faustformeln_2005_1Q.pdf; http://www.bmgs.bund.de/downloads/Beitragssaetze.pdf [Accessed 2005 Sep 2]
- 21.Cotis JP. EFPIA Annual Meeting 2003: healthcare demand in Europe: economic growth and sustainability of the European model. 2003 May 26–28 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.oecd.Org/dataoecd/3/7/12024754.pdf [Accessed 2004 Nov 15]
- 22.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health data 2004: a comparative analysis of 30 countries [available on CD Rom, Version 3.0]. Paris: OCED, 2004Google Scholar
- 23.Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security. Social Healthcare Modernization Law -(GKV -Modernisierungsgesetz) [in German] [online]. Available from URL: http://www.die-gesundheitsreform.de/reform/gesetzgebung/pdf/gkv-modernisierungsgesetz-gmg.pdf [Accessed 2004 Nov 11]
- 24.Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security. Overview of laws relating to social security [in German] [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bmgs.bund.de/download/gesetze_web/gesetze.htm [Accessed 2004 Nov 11]
- 25.Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gba.de [Accessed 2004 Nov 11]
- 26.Stock S, Redaelli M, Lauterbach KW. Disease Management Programme in Deutschland: Anspruch, Wirklichkeit und Perspektiven [in German]. In: Stock S, Redaelli M, Lauterbach KW, editors. Disease Management als Grundlage integrierter Versorgungsstrukturen, W. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer GmbH, 2005: 64–5Google Scholar
- 27.Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bmgs.bund.de/deu/gra/aktuelles/pm/bmgs04/6040_6141.cfm [Accessed 2004 Nov 11]
- 29.AOK Bundesverband. Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of DMP Curaplan Diabetes [in German] [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aokbv.de/imperia/md/content/aokbundesverband/dokumente/pdf/gesundheitsversorgung/dmp_wl_evaluation.pdf [Accessed 2005 Sep 2]
- 30.von Stackelberg JM. Disease Management Programme Patienten profitieren von einer besseren Qualität der Versorgung [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aok-bv.de/imperia/md/content/aokbundesverband/dokumente/pdf/dieaok/aid_310505_stackelberg_f.pdf [Accessed 2005 Nov 17]
- 32.Foote SM. Population-based disease management under fee-for-service Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; Suppl Web Exclusives: W3-342-56Google Scholar