Disease Management and Health Outcomes

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 81–84 | Cite as

Integrating Healthcare Standards and Performance Measurement

  • Richard G. Koss
  • Linda S. Hanold
  • Jerod M. Loeb
Current Opinion

Abstract

Over the past 50 years the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has relied primarily on an assessment of standards compliance to make judgments about the capability of a healthcare organization to provide good quality care. Over the last decade, the focus has shifted from paying exclusive attention to capabilities and routine processes of care, to an assessment of the actual results of care by monitoring and measuring clinical outcomes. This transition requires exploration and understanding of the complex interrelationships between healthcare standards and performance measures.

Adding performance measurement to a standards-based assessment means that the JCAHO can implement a more continuous accreditation process. Continuous accreditation allows an organization to regularly evaluate and improve its processes to maintain performance that constantly meets or exceeds expectations. Establishing a valid, complementary relationship between healthcare standards and performance measures is a complex and challenging undertaking, and fertile ground for extensive research. Success will result in a more complete, thorough and continuous assessment of the care provided by healthcare organizations.

Keywords

Healthcare Organization Performance Measurement System Accreditation Process Core Measure Healthcare Standard 

References

  1. 1.
    Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Administration Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Hospital Accreditation Standards. Oakbrook Tce (IL); 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun BI, Koss RG, Loeb JM. Integrating performance measurement data into the Joint Commission Accreditation Process. Eval Health Prof 1999; 22(3): 283–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanold LS, Koss RG, Loeb JM. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts. Symposium on Quality in Health Care 2000 Oct; TexasMedicine: 84–87.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. ORYX outcomes the next evolution in accreditation, performance measurement systems: evaluation and selection. Oakbrook Tce (IL); 1997: 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard G. Koss
    • 1
  • Linda S. Hanold
    • 1
  • Jerod M. Loeb
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of ResearchJoint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare OrganizationsOakbrook TerraceUSA

Personalised recommendations