Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Healthcare Standards and Performance Measurement

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Over the past 50 years the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has relied primarily on an assessment of standards compliance to make judgments about the capability of a healthcare organization to provide good quality care. Over the last decade, the focus has shifted from paying exclusive attention to capabilities and routine processes of care, to an assessment of the actual results of care by monitoring and measuring clinical outcomes. This transition requires exploration and understanding of the complex interrelationships between healthcare standards and performance measures.

Adding performance measurement to a standards-based assessment means that the JCAHO can implement a more continuous accreditation process. Continuous accreditation allows an organization to regularly evaluate and improve its processes to maintain performance that constantly meets or exceeds expectations. Establishing a valid, complementary relationship between healthcare standards and performance measures is a complex and challenging undertaking, and fertile ground for extensive research. Success will result in a more complete, thorough and continuous assessment of the care provided by healthcare organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Administration Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Hospital Accreditation Standards. Oakbrook Tce (IL); 2001.

  3. Braun BI, Koss RG, Loeb JM. Integrating performance measurement data into the Joint Commission Accreditation Process. Eval Health Prof 1999; 22(3): 283–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanold LS, Koss RG, Loeb JM. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts. Symposium on Quality in Health Care 2000 Oct; TexasMedicine: 84–87.

  5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. ORYX outcomes the next evolution in accreditation, performance measurement systems: evaluation and selection. Oakbrook Tce (IL); 1997: 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerod M. Loeb PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koss, R.G., Hanold, L.S. & Loeb, J.M. Integrating Healthcare Standards and Performance Measurement. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 10, 81–84 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210020-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210020-00002

Keywords

Navigation