Advertisement

Disease Management and Health Outcomes

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 9–16 | Cite as

An HMO-Sponsored Primary Care-Based Disease Management and Case Management Initiative

Economic and Selected Clinical Outcomes
  • Jaan Sidorov
  • Franz Joseph Fisher
  • Sabrina Girolami
  • Otto Wolke
Original Research Article

Abstract

Objective: To describe the cost savings achieved in a health maintenance organization (HMO)-sponsored primary care-based case management and disease management programs.

Methods: The HMO-sponsored programs recruited patients in the primary care setting and relied on clinical guidelines and HMO-employed patient education nurses and case management nurses. Total per member per month (PMPM) charges for medical services and changes in selected clinical outcomes before and after entry into HMO-sponsored case management and disease management programs for actively enrolled participants were compared during the fiscal year January 1, 1998 to November 31, 2000.

Interventions: The disease management programs addressed asthma, diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure (CHF). These programs were based on a network of primary care-based nurse educators and case managers promoting clinical guidelines, appropriate use of the insurance benefit, community-based resources, and communication among all healthcare providers.

Setting and participants: This initiative was based in 55 primary care sites serving 295 000 insureds across northeastern and central Pennsylvania, USA.

Results: 396 patients with asthma had mean baseline PMPM charges of $US298, which decreased to $US276 PMPM after entry. In those with diabetes mellitus, 3556 patients had a mean baseline PMPM charge of $US367 that decreased to $US346. The mean baseline PMPM charge decreased from $US1877 to $US1541 for 1795 patients with CHF. For 3346 patients undergoing case management, the mean baseline PMPM charge was $US1991 and it decreased to $US1545. Total mean reductions in claims over one year of follow-up from the day of entry for patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus, CHF and for case management programs were $US105 544, $US896 112, $US7 237 440 and $US17 907 992, respectively.

Additional data regarding asthma-only claims and pre-post days of work loss in the previous six months, diabetes mellitus-only claims and pre-post mean glycosylated hemoglobin A1c values, inpatient and outpatient CHF total claims, ACE inhibitor use in CHF, and inpatient and outpatient total claims in case management are also provided.

Conclusion: While these claims data may be limited by a lack of statistical significance and by regression to the mean, they suggest that case management and disease management programs in asthma, diabetes and congestive heart failure can be associated with significant financial savings compared with baseline levels of utilization. Clinical outcomes data also suggest this approach may be of benefit.

Keywords

Case Management Disease Management Program Health Maintenance Organization Manage Care Organization Case Management Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bodenheimer T. Disease management: Promises and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1202–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunter D, Fairfield G. Managed care: disease management. BMJ 1997; 315: 50–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellrodt M, Cook DJ, Lee J, et al. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA 1997; 278: 1687–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joshi MS, Bernard DB. Classic CQI integrated with comprehensive disease management as a model for performance improvement. J Qual Improv 1999; 25: 383–95.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kabasakalian LM, Hassett RM. A nurse driven, carve-in approach for managing complex chronic conditions. J Clini Outcomes Manag 1999; 6 (1): 26–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenhalgh T, Herxheimer A, Isaacs AJ, et al. Commercial partnerships in chronic disease management: proceeding with caution. BMJ 2000; 320: 566–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sidorov JE. The continuous health improvement program: research in a managed care setting. HMO Pract 1997; 11: 97–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sidorov JE, Christianson M, Girolami S, et al. A successful primary care nurse led tobacco cessation program in a managed care setting. Am J Manag Care 1997; 3: 207–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sidorov JE. Successful promotion of the proxy for healthcare among outpatient enrollees of an HMO [abstract]. J Gen Int Med 1996; 11: 87S.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sidorov JE, Gabbay R, Harris R, et al. Disease management for diabetes mellitus: the impact on the hemoglobin A1C at three months and one year for 5,332 patients entering an HMO sponsored disease management program. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 1217–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov-/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.htm. [Accessed 2001 Nov 14].
  12. 12.
    Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, et al. Measuring quality of life in asthma. Am Rev Resp Disease 1993; 147: 832–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazze RS, Etzwiler DD, Strock E, et al. Staged diabetes management: towards an integrated model of diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1994; 17 Suppl 1: 56–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Konstam M, Dracup K, Baker D, et al. Heart failure:evaluation and care of patients with left ventricular systolic function. Clinical practice guideline no. 11, Rock-ville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1994 June.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kabasakalian LM, Hassett RM. A nurse driven, carve-in approach for managing complex chronic conditions. J Clini Outcomes Manag 1999; 6 (1): 26–30.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sommers LS, Marton KI, Barbaccia JC, et al. Physician, nurse and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1825–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Institute for Clinical Systems Integration. Health care guidelines: management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Integration, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limiteds 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaan Sidorov
    • 1
  • Franz Joseph Fisher
    • 2
  • Sabrina Girolami
    • 1
  • Otto Wolke
    • 3
  1. 1.Care Coordination DepartmentGeisinger Health PlanDanvilleUSA
  2. 2.Schellen & PartnerDusseldorfGermany
  3. 3.Schellen and PartnersDanvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations