Disease management has become an increasingly popular tool used to manage people with chronic diseases in managed care organizations. The implementation of these programs, coupled with pressures to document quality and control costs, has increased the need for information regarding the health services provided to patients. This paper gives an overview of selected topics involved in data collection, including medical record review, databases, automated systems, and disease management software. The preliminary uses of the Internet and wireless technology are also discussed.
Efficient data collection requires the identification of pertinent information from clinical, patient-reported, and economic data. Several sources provide this. The medical record is considered the gold standard for providing clinical information. However, collecting this data can be time consuming and expensive. Claims that databases have gained popularity for their comprehensiveness and accessibility are eroded by the lack of detailed clinical information. Direct communication with patients via telephone is commonly used in disease management programs, but its effectiveness as a data collection tool is not well documented. The use of the Internet and wireless technology in data collection is an exciting opportunity, since it provides interactive access between providers, patients, and the managed care organization.
In most cases, a combination of data sources will be required to collect all the necessary information. However, claims databases, medical chart review, and telephone interviews are the backbone of data collection in disease management. The computerization of medical information systems, and use of the Internet and wireless technologies, should facilitate future data collection.
Disease Management Program Claim Database Pharmacy Claim Medical Information System Data Collection Strategy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to thank Dr Amy Grizzle and Mr Rick Rehfeld, Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, for their insightful comments in the preparation of this manuscript.
Dr Abarca was funded through a fellowship grant from Pfizer, Inc. There are no conflicts of interest directly related to the contents of the manuscript for either author.
McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Dexter P, et al. A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources. Ann Intern Med 1997 Oct 15; 127(8): 675–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lohr KN. Use of insurance claims data in measuring quality of care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1990; 6(2): 263–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinneen SF, Bjornsen SS, Bryant SC, et al. Towards an optimal model for community-based diabetes care: design and baseline data from the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. J Eval Clin Pract 2000 Nov; 6(4): 421–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold RG, Kotsanos JG, Motheral BR, et al. Methodological issues in conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations: retrospective and claims database studies. Value In Health 1999; 2(2): 82–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solz H, Gilbert K. Health claims data as a strategy and tool in disease management. J Ambulatory Care Manage 2001 Apr; 24(2): 69–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
Armstrong EP, Manuchehri F. Ambulatory care databases for managed care organizations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997 Sep 1; 54: 1973–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hornbrook MC, Goodman MJ, Fishman PA, et al. Building health plan databases to risk adjust outcomes and payments. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10(6): 531–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice JM. A new twist in US health care data standards development: adoption of electronic health care transactions standards for administrative simplification. Int J Med Inf 1998 Feb 1; 48: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Else BA, Armstrong EP, Cox ER. Data sources for pharmacoeconomic and health services research. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997 Nov 15; 54: 2601–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Iezzoni LI. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med 1997 Oct 15; 127(8): 666–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
Motheral BR, Fairman KA. The use of claims databases for outcomes research: rationale, challenges, and strategies. Clin Ther 1997; 19(2): 346–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll J. Health plans demand proof that DM saves them money. Manag Care 2000; 9(11): 25–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Review cost, utilization data to project risk for DM programs. Capitation Rates Data 2000 Aug; 5(8): 93–6Google Scholar
Roglieri JL, Futterman R, McDonough KL, et al. Disease management interventions to improve outcomes in congestive heart failure. Am JManag Care 1997 Dec; 3(12): 1831–9Google Scholar
Fulop G, Kelly MA, Robinson Jr D, et al. Opportunities for depression disease management: a pharmacy benefit manager’s experience. Depression Anxiety 1999; 10(2): 61–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter LF, Whitehurst-Cook MY, Small RE, et al. The impact of disease management on outcomes and cost of care: a study of low-income asthma patients. Inquiry 2000; 37(2): 188–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bronstein JM, Santer L, Johnson V The use of Medicaid claims as a supplementary source of information on quality of asthma care. J Healthc Qual 2000 Nov; 22(6): 13–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobach DF, Underwood HR. Computer-based decision support systems for implementing clinical practice guidelines. Drug Benefit Trends 1998; 10(10): 48–53Google Scholar
Gorman CA, Zimmerman BR, Smith SA, et al. A clinically useful diabetes electronic medical record: lessons from the past; pointers toward the future. Eur J Endocrinol 1996; 134: 31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman CA, Zimmerman BR, Smith SA, et al. DEMS — a second generation diabetes electronic management system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 62: 127–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman CA. Electronic medical records — promises, promises. Ulster Med J 1998; 67: 91–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fowler Jr FJ. Survey research methods. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ, editors. Applied social research methods series. 2nd ed. Newbury Park (CA): Sage, 1993Google Scholar
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Bleich MR. Growth strategies to optimize the functions of telephonic nursing call centers. Nurs Econ 1998 Jul; 16(4): 215–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, et al. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA 1992 Apr; 267(13): 1788–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffens B. Cost-effective management of type 2 diabetes: providing quality care in a cost-constrained environment. Am J Manag Care 2000 Aug; 6 (13 Suppl.): S697–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
Telephonic DM approach to maternity management produces solid returns. Clin Resour Manag 2001 Mar 20; 2(3): 41–4Google Scholar
Seniors with CHF embrace monitoring system based on automatic voice technology. Disease Manag Advis 2001; 7(3): 40–4Google Scholar
Weinberger M, Kirkman MS, Samsa GP, et al. A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: impact on glycemic control and health-related quality of life. J Gen Intern Med 1995 Feb; 10(2): 59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert RE, Herman WH, Waters J, et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998 Oct 15; 129(8): 605–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care. Med Care 2000; 38(2): 218–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, et al. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes?. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 2000; 108: 20–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer PF. Will the Internet change our approach to disease management? Hosp Pract 2000 Mar 15; 35(3): 47Google Scholar
Disease management over the Internet reduces hospitalization. Health Care Strategic Manage 2001 Mar; 19(3): 11Google Scholar
Use the Internet to enhance disease management and reduce costs under capitation. Capitation Manage Rep 1933 Mar 20; 8(3): 39–40Google Scholar
Use your data to efficiently monitor chronic illnesses. Dis Manag Advis 2001; 6(12): 188–91Google Scholar
Baldwin FD. Disease management technology that helps patients manage their chronic disease is proving its worth. Healthc Inform 2001; 18(2): 62–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
Todd WE. Too much privacy can be hazardous to your health. Manag Care Interface 2000 Oct; 13(10): 62–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
Abruzzo MD. Despite what you hear, state privacy statutes no threat to DM. Manag Care 2000 Apr; 9(4): 50–1Google Scholar
Tribble D. The health insurance portability and accountability act: security and privacy requirements. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 763–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
Thompson C. Privacy regulations go into effect, with modifications to come later. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 960PubMedGoogle Scholar
English T. Patient privacy rule will not impede pharmacists. Pharm Today 2001; 7(5): 14Google Scholar