Early Recognition and Intervention
Schizophrenia is possibly the single most costly disorder in psychiatric or somatic medicine, despite a relatively low yearly incidence of about 10/100 000/ year. In many cases it is a life-long disabling disorder. Available treatments, including medication, psychotherapy and family treatments are largely palliative and seem to be of only limited value. This may be due to an apparent delay in providing treatment early in the course of the illness.
Schizophrenia can be regarded as a disorder that develops in stages: premorbid, prodromal and psychotic. Research over the last few years indicates that early treatment for schizophrenia may improve the course of the disorder.
Projects aimed at intervening in the prodromal phase of the disorder have shown that it may be possible to reduce the incidence in a catchment area (Buckingham, UK), or prevent the conversion of prodromal cases into fulminate psychosis (Melbourne, Australia).
In Norway, the Early Treatment and Intervention in Psychosis (TIPS) project demonstrated that it was possible to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis within a catchment area from a mean of 114 weeks to 26 weeks, and thus dramatically reduce the total period of psychosis. There are also indications that earlier detection results in patients who present with less severe psychopathology.
Earlier detection is possible through information campaigns which enhance the public’s knowledge about serious psychiatric disorders, and aim to reduce the stigma associated with this disorder and change help-seeking behavior. Earlier intervention requires easy access to psychiatric health services, and early, comprehensive treatment programs.
Early detection and intervention can be managed successfully ensuring patients are provided with treatment at an earlier point in the development of the illness. Such programs are relatively inexpensive, since it is a question of organizing the health services in a way that meets the population’s needs.
KeywordsSchizophrenia Assertive Community Treatment Brief Psychiatric Rate Scale Prodromal Symptom Early Psychosis
- 1.Mednick S, McGlashan T. Early detection and intervention with psychosis: opportunities for preventing chronicity. New Haven: NATO International Scientific Exchange Programmes. Advanced Study Institute 1996: 1–10Google Scholar
- 2.Andreasen NC. Assessment issues and the cost of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1991; 17: 351–72Google Scholar
- 3.Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease. World Health Organization, Harvard School of Public Health, World Bank. Geneva: Harvard University Press, 1996Google Scholar
- 8.van Os J, Gilvarry C, Bale R, et al. A comparison of the utility of dimensional and categorical representations of psychosis. Eur Psychiatry 2000; 15 Suppl. 2: 286Google Scholar
- 11.Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ. Reducing risk for mental disorder: frontiers of preventive intervention research. Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994Google Scholar
- 18.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1997Google Scholar
- 19.World Health Organization. International classification of diseases. 10th ed. Mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992Google Scholar
- 24.American Psychiatric Association. DSM-III-R: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd rev. ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987Google Scholar
- 25.Shepherd M, Watt D, Faloon IRH, et al. The natural history of schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine Monograph 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989Google Scholar
- 27.Yung AL, Phillips LA, McGorry PD, et al. Prediction of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172 Suppl. 33: 14–20Google Scholar
- 30.Klosterkötter J, Steinmeyer EM, Schultze-Lutter F. The Cologne early recognition project [late abstracts]. Eur Psychiatry 2000; 15: 14Google Scholar
- 34.Beiser M, Erickson D, Fleming JAE, et al. Establishing the onset of psychotic illness. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 150: 1349–54Google Scholar
- 37.Johannessen JO, Larsen TK, McGlashan T, et al. Early intervention in psychosis: the TIPS project, a multi-centre study in Scandinavia. In: Martindale B, Bateman A, Crowe M, et al., editors. Psychosis — psychological approaches and their effectiveness. Glasgow: Gaskell, 2000: 210–34Google Scholar
- 38.Larsen TK, Johannessen JO, McGlashan T, et al. Can duration of untreated psychosis be reduced? In: Birchwood M, Fowler D, Jackson C, editors. Early intervention in psychosis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000: 143–65Google Scholar
- 41.US Department of Health and Human Services. Predictive tobacco use among young people. A report of the surgeon general. Atlantic: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994Google Scholar
- 42.Johannessen JO, McGlashan TH, Larsen TK, et al. Early detection strategies for untreated first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. In pressGoogle Scholar
- 43.Larsen TK, Johannessen JO, Guldberg C, et al. Early intervention programs in first-episode psychosis and reduction of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). Schizophr Res 1999; 36: 344–5Google Scholar
- 44.Friis S, Melle I, Haahr U, et al. Threats to validity in outcome studies of early intervention in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1999; 36: 340Google Scholar
- 51.Remington G, Kapur S, Zipursky R. Pharmacotherapy of fistepisode schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172 Suppl. 33: 66–70Google Scholar
- 53.Olin SCS, Mednick SA, Cannon T, et al. School teacher ratings predictive of psychiatric outcome 25 years later. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172 Suppl. 33: 7–13Google Scholar