Bone Graft Alternatives for Spinal Fusion
- 43 Downloads
Bone grafting to achieve fusion is frequently performed in spinal surgery. Autograft is the gold standard bone graft material. However, due to limitations of supply and morbidity associated with the harvest of autograft, alternatives are being considered. Osteoconductive matrices, such as allograft, calcium or ceramic preparations are one such class of potential bone graft alternatives, but generally they lack osteoinductive properties. Recent attention has focused on osteoinductive materials such as demineralised bone matrix, recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins and bone marrow aspirates or blood product concentrates. These products may be combined with osteoconductive carriers and are clearly finding a place in the clinical arena.
KeywordsBone Graft Fusion Rate Allograft Bone Demineralised Bone Matrix Bone Graft Material
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. Research support was received from Stryker Biotech (Hopkinton, MA, USA).
- 3.Gupta AR, Shah NR, Patel TC, et al. Perioperative long-term complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting for spinal surgery: a quantitative review of the literature. Int Med J 2001; 8: 163–6Google Scholar
- 9.West JL, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS. Pedicle screw plate fixation with allograft bone [abstract]. Orthop Trans 1991; 15: 733Google Scholar
- 14.Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, et al. Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery. LaGrange (IL): North Am Spine Society, 2002: 1–16Google Scholar
- 15.BucholzRW, Carlton A, Holmes RE. Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am 1987 Apr; 18(2): 323–34Google Scholar
- 21.Lee YP, Wang JC, Kamin LEA, et al. The direct comparison of different commercially available demineralized bone matrix substances in an athymic rat model. Seattle (WA): North Am Spine Society, 2001Google Scholar
- 22.Wang JC, Davies M, Kanim LEA, et al. Prospective comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrix for spine fusion. New Orleans (LA): North Am Spine Society, 2000Google Scholar
- 25.Cunningham BW, Shimamoto N, Sefter J, et al. Osteointegration of autograft vs osteogenic protein 1. Seattle (WA): North Am Spine Society, 2001Google Scholar
- 26.Patel TC, McCulloch JA, Vacarro AR, et al. A pilot safety and efficacy study of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) in posterolateral lumbar fusion as a replacement for iliac crest autograft. Seattle (WA): North Am Spine Society, 2001Google Scholar
- 27.Patel TC, Vaccaro AR, Truumees E, et al. Two-year follow-up of a safety and efficacy study of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as an adjunct to posterolateral lumbar fusion. Seattle (WA): North Am Spine Society, 2001Google Scholar
- 28.Speck G. Posterolateral lumbar fusion using OP-1: preliminary results. Adelaide (SA): Australian Spine Society, 2000Google Scholar
- 39.Muschler GF. Bone marrow aspirate: a source of connective tissue stem cells. Emerging Technologies Conference; 2002 Oct 18; Washington (DC)Google Scholar