Clinical Drug Investigation

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 165–174 | Cite as

Clinical Experience over Five Years of Daily Therapy with Formoterol in Patients with Bronchial Asthma

  • Martin A. Häcki
  • Georg W. Hinz
  • Tullio C. Medici
Clinical Use

Summary

This study investigated regular treatment with the long-acting β2-agonist formoterol over 5 years in patients with predominantly moderate to severe bronchial asthma. It was an open, prospective, surveillance study in 54 randomly selected asthmatics that considered concomitant medication, pulmonary function, exacerbations and the patients’ subjective condition. The objective findings were compared with the corresponding data for the previous 12 months. Five follow-up examinations were carried out for 5 consecutive years. The mean number of 12µg puffs of formoterol inhaled per day over 5 years was 2.5, 2.5, 2.6, 2.5 and 2.2, for each consecutive year. The number of patients who used an electric nebuliser fell from 41 (pretrial period) to 6, 4, 3, 1 and 1, consecutively over the 5-year period (p < 0.001). The total number of patients using theophylline fell from 31 to 9 in the first year, and dropped to 4 at the end of the trial (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients on inhaled corticosteroids remained more or less constant (72 vs 75%). The mean daily use of beclomethasone dipropionate decreased from 2.8 to 1.9 puffs daily after 1 year and remained at this level (p < 0.05). During the pretrial period, 27 patients had exacerbations necessitating treatment with systemic corticosteroids. This number fell to 12, 5, 11, 6 and 9 over the consecutive years, and the mean number of interventions decreased from 1.6 to 0.2 at the end of the trial (p < 0.001). Over 5 years of treatment, the mean decrease in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was 0.11 ±0.52L and the mean reversibility fell by 0.001 ± 0.36L, indicating a high stability of lung function. Adverse effects occurred in 19 of 66 patients (29%). Two patients died. Neither of the deaths was judged to be related to the therapy with formoterol. In conclusion, regular therapy with formoterol appears to be very useful; there was a significant reduction in concomitant use of asthma drugs, with well-preserved pulmonary function, better subjective condition and less need for corticosteroid intervention treatment. No increase in the formoterol dose was observed, indicating no clinically relevant development of tolerance. Furthermore, no patient had to be withdrawn because of adverse effects.

Keywords

Asthma Adis International Limited Theophylline Salbutamol Salmeterol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sears MR, Taylor DR, Print CG, et al. Regular inhaled β-agonist treatment in bronchial asthma. Lancet 1990; 336: 1391–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Schayck CP, Dompeling E, van Herwaarden CLA, et al. Bronchodilator treatment in moderate asthma or chronic bronchitis: continuous or on demand? A randomised controlled study. BMJ 1991; 303: 1426–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vathenen AS, Knox AJ, Higgins BG, et al. Rebound increase in bronchial responsiveness after treatment with inhaled terbutaline. Lancet 1988; 1: 554–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tasake K. Formoterol (Atock): a new orally active and selective β2-receptor stimulant. Drugs Today 1986; 22: 505–19Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arvidsson P, Larsson S, Löfdahl CG, et al. Formoterol, a new long-acting bronchodilator for inhalation. Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 325–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kesten S, Chapman KR, Broder I, et al. Sustained improvement in asthma with long term use of formoterol fumarate. Ann Allergy 1992; 69: 415–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wallin A, Melander B, Rosenhall L, et al. Formoterol, a new long-acting β2-agonist for inhalation twice daily compared with salbutamol in the treatment of asthma. Thorax 1990; 45: 259–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arvidsson P, Larsson S, Löfdahl CG, et al. Inhaled formoterol during one year in asthma: a comparison with salbutamol. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 1168–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schultze-Werninghaus G. Multicenter 1-year trial on formoterol, a new long-acting β2-agonist, in chronic obstructive airway disease. Lung 1990; 168 Suppl.: 83–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Thoracic Society. Definitions and classification of chronic bronchitis, asthma and pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1962; 82: 762–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Asthma Education Program. Executive summary: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Publication No. 91-3042 A, June 1991Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Thoracic Society. Standardisation of spirometry, 1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 130: 1296–2009Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lienert GA. Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Vol. 1. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, 1986Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Schayck CP, Dompeling E, van Hexwaarden CL, et al. Continuous and on demand use of bronchodilators in patients with non-steroid dependent asthma and chronic bronchitis: four-year follow-up randomised controlled study. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45: 239–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barnes N. Efficacy and effectiveness in the treatment of patients with asthma. Eur Respir Rev 1995; 5: 284–7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moertel CG. Improving the efficiency of clinical trials, a medical perspective. Stat Med 1984; 3: 455–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pocock SJ. Letter to the editor. BMJ 1977; 1: 1661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gehan EA. The evaluation of therapies: historical control studies. Stat Med 1984; 3: 315–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lasagna L. Historical control: the practitioner’s clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 1339–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Idris A, McDermott MF, Raucci JC, et al. Emergency department treatment of severe asthma. Metered-dose inhaler plus holding chamber is equivalent in effectiveness to nebulizer. Chest 1993; 103: 665–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fletcher C, Peto R, Tinker C, et al. The natural history of chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dompeling E, van Schayck CP, van Grunsven PM, et al. Slowing the deterioriation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease observed during bronchodilator therapy by adding inhaled corticosteroids: a 4-year prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 770–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Britton MG, Earnshaw JS, Palmer JBD. A 12-month comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 1062–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D’Alonzo GE, Nathan RA, Henochowicz S, et al. Twice daily inhaled salmeterol as maintenance therapy for asthma. JAMA 1994; 271: 1412–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lundbäck R, Rawlinson DW, Palmer JBD. A 12-month comparison of salbutamol as dry powder formulations in asthmatic patients. Thorax 1993; 48: 148–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pearlman DS, Chervinsky P, La Force G, et al. A comparison of salbutamol with salmeterol in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1420–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tattersfield AE. Tolerance to beta-agonists. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1985; 21: 1s–5sPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Newnham DM, Grove A, McDevitt DG, et al. Subsensitivity of bronchodilatator and systemic beta-2-adrenoceptor responses after regular twice daily treatment with formoterol dry powder in asthmatic patients. Thorax 1995; 50: 497–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin A. Häcki
    • 1
  • Georg W. Hinz
    • 2
  • Tullio C. Medici
    • 3
  1. 1.Chest Outpatient CentreZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.MedidataZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine, PneumologyUniversity HospitalZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations