Skip to main content
Log in

Bioavailability of a Generic Sustained-Release Formulation of Diclofenac Compared with the Standard Sustained-Release Formulation

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence of two 100mg sustained-release formulations of diclofenac sodium: the standard formulation, marketed in France as Voltaren LP®, and 3 different batches of a generic formulation marketed in France as Xenid LP®. The study was an open, randomised, 4-way crossover study with 4 treatment periods separated by a washout interval of at least 7 days. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. The diclofenac pharmacokinetic values for Voltaren LP® were similar to those observed in previous studies, with a mean maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) of 1827 ± 1146.5 nmol/L, a median time to reach Cmax (tmax) of 5 hours, and an estimated half-life of 3.0 ± 1.7 hours. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t) for Voltaren LP® was 7154 ± 1556.2 nmol/L·h. Overall diclofenac plasma concentrations were much lower after administration of all batches of Xenid LP® than after administration of Voltaren LP®. The mean relative bioavailability from comparison of AUC0–t values for batches A, B and C of Xenid LP® with those for Voltaren LP® was 79.0 ± 22.6%, 59.3 ± 38.5% and 50.2 ± 17.8%, respectively. Cmax was approximately 60 to 74% lower for all batches of Xenid LP® compared with Voltaren LP®. There was inter- and intrasubject variability in the plasma data for all treatments; however, this was more pronounced after administration of Xenid LP®. Coefficient of variation values ranged from 22 to 67% for AUC0–t and Cmax. Comparison of AUC0–t, Cmax and tmax indicated that none of the 3 batches of Xenid LP® were bioequivalent to Voltaren LP®. Additionally, the batches were not bioequivalent when compared with each other, although the diclofenac pharmacokinetics of batches B and C were similar. The low bioavailability of Xenid LP® compared with the standard sustained-release formulation indicates that the 2 formulations are not therapeutically equivalent and, at a dose level of 100mg, Xenid LP® may actually be ineffective as a maintenance treatment for inflammatory disorders, assuming that the amount of systemically available drug is relevant to the clinical effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ku EC, Lee W, Kothari HV, et al. Effect of diclofenac on the arachidonic acid cascade. Am J Med 1986; 80 Suppl. 4B: 18–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. John VA. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of diclofenac sodium in animals and in man. In: Haslock I, et al., editors. Diclofenac in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: a conspectus of international experience. Rheumatol Rehabil 1979; 17 Suppl. 2: 22–37

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sioufi A, Stierlin H, Schweizer A, et al. Recent findings concerning clinically relevant pharmacokinetics of diclofen sodium. In: Kass E, editor. Voltaren — new findings. Berne, Stuttgart, Vienna: Hans Huber, 1982: 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willis JV, Kendall MJ, Flinn RM, et al. The pharmacokinetics of diclofenac sodium following intravenous and oral administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 16: 405–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Voltaren (diclofenac) — twenty years of clinical experience (an update). Basle: Ciba-Geigy Limited, 1994

  6. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics: drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences. 2nd rev. ed. 1982: 15

  7. Raz I, Hussein Z, Samara E, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of a novel sustained-release dosage form of diclofenac sodium in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharm Ther Toxicol 1988; 26(5): 246–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Suleiman MS, Najib N, El-Sayed Y, et al. A study on the relative bioavailability of a sustained-release formulation of diclofenac sodium. Int J Clin Pharm Ther Toxicol 1989; 27(6): 276–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Snedocor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Iowa State Univ Press, 1982: 217–53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharm Biopharm 1987; 15: 657–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975. Chapters 3 and 4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hasan MM, Najib NM, Muti H. A comparative bioavailability study on two sustained-release formulations of diclofenac sodium following a single dose administration. Int J Clin Pharm Ther Toxicol 1993; 31(8): 387–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sørensen K. A long-term investigation of a new antirheumatic drug, diclofenac sodium (Voltaren). Scand J Rheumatol 1978; Suppl. 22: 81–5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson S, Brahim J. An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac potassium, aspirin, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. Todays Ther Trends 1995; 12 Suppl. 1: 3–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooper, I.T., Allen, E., McLaughlin, K. et al. Bioavailability of a Generic Sustained-Release Formulation of Diclofenac Compared with the Standard Sustained-Release Formulation. Clin. Drug Invest. 12, 259–270 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612050-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612050-00005

Keywords

Navigation