Drugs & Therapy Perspectives

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 13–16 | Cite as

Technology the solution to improved ADR reporting

Drug Reactions and Interactions
  • 8 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, et al. Identifying and quantifying signals automatically [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stather R. Update on collecting ADRs and new methods of signal generation. Reactions 1998 Sep 12; 718: 3–5Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis S, Evans S, Wark S, et al. Signal generation: procedures for identification, evaluation and tracking [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delaney SA, Fiddes S, Coulson R. UK ADR reporting: trends and initiatives [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 97Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curel P. Electronic ADR reporting is the way to the future. Reactions 1997 Aug 9; 663: 3–4Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee A, Bateman DN, Edwards C, et al. Reporting of adverse drug reactions by hospital pharmacists: pilot scheme. BMJ 1997 Aug 30; 315: 519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arlett PR, Lee EH, Grant EM, et al. UK HIV adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting scheme [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis lnternational Limited 1999

Personalised recommendations