Skip to main content
Log in

Technology the solution to improved ADR reporting

  • Drug Reactions and Interactions
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, et al. Identifying and quantifying signals automatically [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stather R. Update on collecting ADRs and new methods of signal generation. Reactions 1998 Sep 12; 718: 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis S, Evans S, Wark S, et al. Signal generation: procedures for identification, evaluation and tracking [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delaney SA, Fiddes S, Coulson R. UK ADR reporting: trends and initiatives [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curel P. Electronic ADR reporting is the way to the future. Reactions 1997 Aug 9; 663: 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee A, Bateman DN, Edwards C, et al. Reporting of adverse drug reactions by hospital pharmacists: pilot scheme. BMJ 1997 Aug 30; 315: 519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arlett PR, Lee EH, Grant EM, et al. UK HIV adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting scheme [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998 Aug; 7 (Suppl. 2): 83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Technology the solution to improved ADR reporting. Drugs Ther. Perspect 13, 13–16 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-199913020-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-199913020-00005

Navigation