Advertisement

American Journal of Cancer

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 3–6 | Cite as

p53 Gene Therapy

Clinical Experience to Date
Leading Article

Abstract

Based on the frequent inactivation of the p53 gene product in human malignancy, and its functional involvement in tumor suppression, cell cycle control and apoptosis, p53 was identified as an attractive target for somatic gene therapy strategies in cancer. Several pilot and phase I studies explored the intratumoral injection of viral expression vectors encoding the p53 cDNA in patients with advanced cancer. These studies confirmed the safety and feasibility of this approach. Further, vector-specific transgene expression and surrogate markers for biological activity of the transgene were demonstrated. Local tumor regression, or stabilization of tumor growth, were observed in some studies, and were interpreted as evidence for clinical activity. No formal assessment of in vivo transduction efficacy and vector distribution, following intratumoral injection of p53 expression vectors, was performed.

The instillation of adenoviral p53 expression vectors into cavitary organs, such as the peritoneum or the bladder, has been studied as an alternative mode of application. Intravesical p53 vector installation, in combination with a transduction-enhancing agent, proved to be safe, feasible and biologically active in a phase I study of patients with bladder cancer. Transgene expression, following vector installation, was superior to intratumoral vector injection in this trial, and effective vector distribution and penetration were achieved by the former treatment. The publication of results from the studies of intraperitoneal vector installation in patients with ovarian cancer is still awaited.

To date, only one published phase II study has formally assessed the clinical efficacy of adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No clinically relevant benefit of local p53 gene therapy was identified in patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy when local responses of individual tumor lesions treated with intratumoral vector were compared. The results from additional efficacy studies performed in patients with NSCLC or head and neck cancer are pending.

In summary, current studies failed to translate the preclinical success of intratumoral p53 vector injection into the clinic. A major obstacle is the unknown, and probably inefficient, vector delivery following intratumoral injection. In contrast, an effective delivery can be achieved by intravesical instillation of a p53 expression vector in patients with bladder cancer. These results merit further investigation in phase II studies. Recent improvements in vector technology, including targeting techniques, tissue-specific transgene expression andtumor-selective vector replication, will certainly allow investigators to study the efficacy of p53 gene therapy in a next wave of carefully conducted clinical trials.

Keywords

Radical Cystectomy Intratumoral Injection Vector Distribution Intravesical Instillation Somatic Gene Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Max-Eder-Program of the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70-2952), and by a grant from Schering-Plough Research Institute.

References

  1. 1.
    Hollstein M, Rice K, Greenblatt MS, et al. Database of p53gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 3551–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 2000; 408: 307–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, et al. p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell 1993; 74: 957–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmitt CA, McCurrach ME, de Stachina E, et al. INK4a/ARF mutations accelerate lymphomagenesis and promote chemoresistance by disabling p53. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 2670–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quinlan DC, Davidson AG, Summers CL, et al. Accumulation of p53 protein correlates with a poor prognosis in human lung cancer. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 4828–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishio M, Koshikawa T, Kuroishi T, et al. Prognostic significance of abnormal p53 accumulation in primary, resected non-small-cell lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohsaki Y, Toyshima E, Fujiuchi S, et al. bcl-2 and p53 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancers: correlation with survival time. Clin Cancer Res 1996; 2: 915–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esrig D, Elmajian D, Groshen S, et al. Accumulation of nuclear p53 and tumor progression in bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1259–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dohner H, Fischer K, Bentz M, et al. p53 gene deletion predicts for poor survival and non-response to therapy with purine analogs in chronic B-cell leukemias. Blood 1995; 85: 1580–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin Y, Tainsky MA, Bischoff FZ, et al. Wild-type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles. Cell 1992; 70: 937–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fujiwara T, Grimm EA, Mukhopadhyay T, et al. Induction of chemosensitivity in human lung cancer cells in vivo by adenovirus-mediated transfer of the wild-type p53 gene. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2287–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen LL, Dell J, Maxwell E, et al. Efficacy of p53 adenovirus-mediated gene therapy against human breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Gene Ther 1997; 4: 129–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roth JA, Nguyen D, Lawrence DD, et al. Retrovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer to tumors of patients with lung cancer. Nat Med 1996; 2: 985–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schuler M, Rochlitz C, Horowitz JA, et al. Aphase I study of adenovirus mediated wild type p53 gene transfer in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9: 2075–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boulay JL, Perruchoud AP, Reuter J, et al.p21 gene expression as an indicator for the activity of adenovirus-p53 gene therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Gene Ther 2000; 7: 1215–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clayman GL, El-Naggar AK, Lippman SM, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in patients with advanced recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2221–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clayman GL, Frank DK, Bruso PA, et al. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer as a surgical adjuvant in advanced head and neck cancers. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1715–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swisher SG, Roth JA, Nemunaitis J, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 763–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nemunaitis J, Swisher SG, Timmons T, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in sequence with cisplatin to tumors of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 609–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schuler M, Herrmann R, De Greve JLP, et al. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1750–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuball J, Wen SF, Leissner J, et al. Successful adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer in patients with bladder cancer by intravesical vector instillation. J Clin Oncol. In pressGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wills KN, Maneval DC, Menzel P, et al. Development and characterization of recombinant adenoviruses encoding human p53 for gene therapy of cancer. Hum Gene Ther 1994; 5: 1079–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Engler H, Anderson SC, Machemer TR, et al. Ethanol improves adenovirus-mediated gene transfer and expression to the bladder urothelium of rodents. Urology 1999; 53: 1049–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Connor RJ, Engler H, Machemer T, et al. Identification of polyamines that enhance adenoviral-mediated gene expression in the urothelium. Gene Ther 2001; 8: 41–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DummerR, Bergh J, Karlsson Y, et al. Biological activity and safety of adenoviral vector-expressed wild-type p53 after intratumoral injection in melanoma and breast cancer patients with p53-overexpressing tumors. Cancer Gene Ther 2000; 7: 1069–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Ring E, et al. Gene therapy of colorectal liver metastases using arecombinant adenovirus encoding wt p53 (SCH 58500) viahepatic artery infusion: a phase I study [abstract]. Proc ASCO 1998; 16: 61Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosenwirth B, Kuhn EM, Heeney JL, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of ALVAC wild-type human p53 (vCP207) by the intravenous route in rhesus macaques. Vaccine 2001; 19: 1661–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science 1996; 274: 373–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ries S J, Brandts CH, Chung AS, et al. Loss of pl4ARF in tumor cells facilitates replication of the adenovirus mutant dll520 (ONYX-015). Nat Med 2000; 6: 1128–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khuri FR, Nemunaitis J, Ganly I, et al. A controlled trial of intratumoral ONYX-015, a selectively-replicating adenovirus, in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Nat Med 2000; 6: 879–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Minna JD, Gazdar AF. Translational research comes of age. Nat Med 1996; 2: 974–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine IIIJohannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations